Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T11:15:28.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors affecting vascular access complications in children undergoing congenital cardiac catheterization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2011

Alaa M. Roushdy ,
Noha Abdelmonem  and
Azza A. El Fiky
Alaa M. Roushdy*
Affiliation:
Cardiology Department, Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
Noha Abdelmonem
Affiliation:
Cardiology Department, Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
Azza A. El Fiky
Affiliation:
Cardiology Department, Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
*
Correspondence to: Dr A. M. Roushdy, MD, Cardiology Department, Ain Shams University Hospital, Abbassya, 21 Gamal El deen Dweedar Street, Nasr City, Cairo P0 11371, Egypt. Tel: 202 26713560; Fax: 202 24820416; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Complications at the vascular access sites are among the most common adverse events in congenital cardiac catheterization. The use of small-gauge catheters may reduce these events; however, other factors can contribute to the development of vascular complications.

Objectives

To determine factors associated with the development of vascular access complications in children undergoing congenital cardiac catheterization.

Methods

We performed a prospective study of 403 patients who underwent diagnostic (62.5%) or interventional (37.5%) cardiac catheterization over a period of 6 months, and analysed the vascular complications during and immediately after the procedure.

Results

The most common access-related adverse event was transient loss of pulsation (17.6%). Other less common access-related adverse events included subcutaneous haematoma (2%), bleeding (3%), vessel tear (0.2%), and vein thrombosis (0.2%). Patients who had no access-related adverse events had significantly higher age and body weight compared with those who had one or more access problems. Among 81 patients who had vascular access established in unplanned access sites, 30 patients (37%) had lost pulsations. Among the 322 patients who had vascular access established in planned access sites, however, only 41 patients had lost pulsation (13%). In addition, patients who had lost pulsations had significantly longer puncture time compared to those who had normal pulsations (p value 0.01).

Conclusion

Factors other than sheath size can contribute to access-related adverse events in children undergoing cardiac catheterization. Obtaining vascular access in unplanned access sites and longer puncture times increases the incidence of lost pulsations after catheterization. Younger age and smaller body weight are also associated with significant increase in access-related adverse events.

Keywords

Spasmthrombosispaediatric cardiac interventioncatheterizationvascular access
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , 02 March 2012 , pp. 136 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Radtke, WAK. Vascular access and management of its complications. Pediatr Cardiol 2005; 26: 140–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Balaguru, D, Dilawar, M, Ruff, P, Radtke, W. Early and late results of thrombolytic therapy using tissue-type plasminogen activator to restore arterial pulse after cardiac catheterization in infants and small children. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91: 908–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Qiong, L, Chao-wu, Y, Shi-hua, Z, et al. Thrombolytic therapy for femoral artery thrombosis after left cardiac catheterization in children. Chin Med J 2009; 122: 931–934.Google Scholar
4.Mommsen, P, Zeckey, C, Hildebrand, F, et al. Traumaltic extremity arterial injury in children: epidemiology, diagnostics, treatment and prognostic value of Mangled Extremity Severity Score. J Orthop Surg Res 2010; 5: 25http://www.josr-online.com/content/5/1/25Google Scholar
5.LaQuaglia, MP, Upton, J, May, JW Jr. Microvascular reconstruction of major arteries in neonates and small children. J Pediatr Surg 1991; 26: 1136–1140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Friedman, J, Fabre, J, Netscher, D, Jaksic, T. Treatment of acute neonatal vascular injuries – the utility of multiple interventions. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34: 940–945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Bergersen, L, Marshall, A, Gauvreau, K, et al. Adverse event rates in congenital cardiac catheterization – a multi-center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 389–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Seldinger, SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography. Acta Radiol 1953; 39: 368–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Lurie, P, Armer, R, Klatte, E. Percutaneous guide wire catheterization: diagnosis and therapy. Am J Dis Child 1963; 106: 189–195.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Vitiello, R, McCrindle, BW, Nykanen, D, Freedom, RM, Benson, LN. Complications associated with pediatric cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1433–1440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Mehta, R, Lee, KJ, Chaturvedi, R, Benson, L. Complications of pediatric cardiac catheterization: a review in the current era. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 72: 278–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Bergersen, L, Gauvreau, K, Jenkins, K, Lock, J. Adverse event rates in congenital cardiac catheterization: a new understanding of risks. Congenit Heart Dis 2008; 3: 90–105.Google Scholar
13.Kulkarni, S, Naidu, R. Vascular ultrasound imaging to study immediate postcatheterization vascular complications in children. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68: 450–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Filis, K, Arhontovasilis, F, Theodorov, D, et al. Management of early and late detected vascular complications following femoral arterial puncture for cardiac catheterization. Hellenic J Cardiol 2007; 48: 134–142.Google Scholar
15.Huang, YC, Chang, JS, Lai, YC, Li, PC. Importance of prevention and early intervention of adverse events in pediatric cardiac catheterization: a review of three years of experience. Pediatr Neonatol 2009; 50: 280–286.Google Scholar
16.Lin, P, Dodson, T, Bush, R, et al. Surgical intervention for complications caused by femoral artery catheterization in pediatric patients. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33: 1071–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Qiong, L, Chao-wu, Y, Shi-hua, Z, et al. Thrombolytic therapy for femoral artery thrombosis after left cardiac catheterization in children. Chin Med J 2009; 122: 931–934.Google Scholar
18.Saxena, A, Gupta, R, Kumar, RK, Kothari, SS, Wsir, HS. Predictors of arterial thrombosis after diagnostic cardiac catheterization in infants and children randomized to two heparin dosages. Cather Cardiovasc Diagn 1997; 41: 400–403.Google Scholar
19.Rivers, SP, Lee, ES, Lyon, RT, Monrad, S, Hoffman, T, Veith, FJ. Successful conservative management of iatrogenic femoral arterial trauma. Ann Vasc Surg 1992; 6: 45–49.Google Scholar