Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:40:48.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Criteria for judging the improvement in subclinical rheumatic valvitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2005

Sevim Karaaslan ,
Saadet Demirören ,
Bülent Oran ,
Tamer Baysal ,
Osman Başpinar  and
Canan Uçar
Sevim Karaaslan
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Meram Medicine Faculty, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey
Saadet Demirören
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Meram Medicine Faculty, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey
Bülent Oran
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Meram Medicine Faculty, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey
Tamer Baysal
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Meram Medicine Faculty, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey
Osman Başpinar
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Meram Medicine Faculty, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey
Canan Uçar
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Meram Medicine Faculty, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent technical improvements in cross-sectional echocardiography have made it possible to detect even mild organic regurgitation of the mitral and aortic valves in patients with acute rheumatic fever. To determine the prevalence and prognosis of subclinical valvitis, we have analyzed 104 patients with acute rheumatic fever referred to our institution. Of 53 patients who had no murmur, 22 of them with polyarthritis, 29 with chorea, and 2 with polyarthritis and chorea, 23 (43.4%) had subclinical valvitis. Isolated mitral regurgitation was the most common valvar lesion, seen in 82.6% of the patients. Isolated aortic regurgitation was detected in 4.4% of the cases, and combined mitral and aortic regurgitation in the remaining 13%. During follow-up, the degree of mitral regurgitation improved in 59.1%, decreased in 18.2%, and increased or remained unchanged in 22.7% according to the length of colour jet. According to criterions of velocity, mitral regurgitation improved in 86.4% of the patients, and increased or unchanged in the remaining 13.6%. Mitral regurgitation disappeared completely in 6 of the patients (27.3%) as judged according to both the length of colour jet and the velocity of regurgitation. Aortic regurgitation improved in all the patients with this problem, disappearing completely in two of the four.

Based on this experience, we suggest that not only the disappearance of regurgitation, but also improvements in the echocardiographic diagnostic criterions of regurgitation, such as the length of the colour jet less than 1 cm, or velocity less than 2.5 m/s, or indicative of regurgitation that is either intermittent or of short duration, should also be considered as criterions indicating improvement in valvar regurgitation in patients with subclinical rheumatic valvitis.

Keywords

Rheumatic feverrheumatic carditiscross-sectional echocardiography
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 13 , Issue 6 , December 2003 , pp. 500 - 505
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Saxena A. Diagnosis of rheumatic fever: current status of Jones criteria and role of echocardiography. Indian J Pediatr 2000; 67: 283–286.Google Scholar
Folger GM Jr, Hajar R, Robida A, Hajar HA. Occurrence of valvar heart disease in acute rheumatic fever without evident carditis: colour-flow Doppler identification. Br Heart J 1992; 67: 434–438.Google Scholar
Minich LL, Tani LY, Pagotto LT, Shaddy RE, Veasy LG. Doppler echocardiography distinguishes between physiological and pathologic “silent” mitral regurgitation in patients with rheumatic fever. Clin Cardiol 1997; 20: 924–926.Google Scholar
Figueroa FE, Fernández SM, Valdés P, et al. Prospective comparison of clinical and echocardiographic diagnosis of rheumatic carditis: long term follow up of patients with subclinical disease. Heart 2001; 85: 407–410.Google Scholar
Abernethy M, Bass N, Sharpe N, et al. Doppler echocardiography and the early diagnosis of carditis in acute rheumatic fever. Aust NZ J Med 1994; 24: 530–535.Google Scholar
Veasy LG, Tani LY, Hill HR. Persistence of acute rheumatic fever in the intermountain area of the United States. J Pediatr 1994; 124: 9–16.Google Scholar
Veasy LG. Echocardiography for diagnosis and management of rheumatic fever (letter). JAMA 1993; 269: 2084.Google Scholar
Wilson NJ, Neutze JM. Echocardiographic diagnosis of subclinical carditis in acute rheumatic fever. Int J Cardiol 1995; 50: 1–6.Google Scholar
Wilson NJ, Neutze JM. Echocardiographic diagnosis of mitral insufficiency (letter). J Pediatr 1994; 125: 673–674.Google Scholar
Özkutlu S, Ayabakan C, Saraçlar M. Can subclinical valvitis detected by echocardiography be accepted as evidence of carditis in the diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever? Cardiol Young 2001; 11: 255–260.Google Scholar
Special Writing Group of the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young of the American Heart Association. Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Rheumatic Fever. Jones Criteria, 1992 Update. JAMA 1992; 268: 2069–2073.
Hilário MOE, Andrade JL, Gasparian AB, Carvalho AC, Andrade CT, Len CA. The value of echocardiography in the diagnosis and followup of rheumatic carditis in children and adolescents: a 2 year prospective study. J Rheumatol 2000; 27: 1082–1086.Google Scholar
Congeni B, Rizzo C, Congeni J, Sreenivasan VV. Outbreak of acute rheumatic fever in northeast Ohio. J Pediatr 1987; 111: 176–179.Google Scholar
Chun LT, Reddy V, Yamamoto LG. Rheumatic fever in children and adolescents in Hawaii. Pediatrics 1987; 79: 549–552.Google Scholar
Bitar FF, Hayek P, Obeid M, Gharzeddine W, Mikati M, Dbaibo GS. Rheumatic fever in children: a 15-year experience in a developing country. Pediatr Cardiol 2000; 21: 119–122.Google Scholar
Okoroma EO, Ihenacho IN, Anyanwu CH. Rheumatic fever in Nigerian children. A prospective study of 66 patients. Am J Dis Child 1981; 135: 236–238.Google Scholar
Al-Eissa YA, Al-Zamil FA, Al Fadley FA, Al Herbish AS, Al-Mofada SM, Al-Omair AO. Acute rheumatic fever in Saudi Arabia: mild pattern of initial attack. Pediatr Cardiol 1993; 14: 89–92.Google Scholar
Nair DV, Kabir HA, Thankam S. Epidemiological survey of rheumatic heart disease in school children at Alleppey. Indian Heart J 1980; 32: 65–71.Google Scholar
Carapetis JR, Currie BJ. Rheumatic chorea in northern Australia: a clinical and epidemiological study. Arch Dis Child 1999; 80: 353–358.Google Scholar
Eisenberg MJ. Rheumatic heart disease in the developing world: prevalence, prevention, and control. Eur Heart J 1993; 14: 122–128.Google Scholar
Vasan RS, Shrivastava S, Vijayakumar M, Narang R, Lister BC, Narula J. Echocardiographic evaluation of patients with acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic carditis. Circulation 1996; 94: 73–82.Google Scholar
Yoshida K, Yoshikawa J, Shakudo M, et al. Colour Doppler evaluation of valvular regurgitation in normal subjects. Circulation 1988; 78: 840–847.Google Scholar
Choong CY, Abascal VM, Weyman J, et al. Prevalence of valvular regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography in patients with structurally normal hearts by two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J 1989; 117: 636–642.Google Scholar
Akasaka T, Yoshikawa J, Yoshida K, et al. Age-related valvular regurgitation: a study by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 1987; 76: 262–265.Google Scholar
Brand A, Dollberg S, Keren A. The prevalence of valvular regurgitation in children with structurally normal hearts: a colour Doppler echocardiographic study. Am Heart J 1992; 123: 177–180.Google Scholar
Kostucki W, Vandenbossche J-L, Friart A, Englert M. Pulsed Doppler regurgitant flow patterns of normal valves. Am J Cardiol 1986; 58: 309–313.Google Scholar