Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T17:00:50.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of morbidity and mortality outcomes of conventional and sutureless repair techniques in children with isolated total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2025

Kübra Gözaçık Karakoç
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
Batuhan Yazıcı
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
Hacer Kamalı
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
Okan Yıldız
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
Gökhan Karakoç
Affiliation:
Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Model Statistics CRO and Clinical Trials Center, Kayseri, Türkiye
Sertaç Haydin
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
İsmihan Selen Onan*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
*
Corresponding author: İsmihan Selen Onan; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Objectives:

The sutureless repair technique has been favoured due to its purported reduction in post-operative pulmonary venous obstruction rates. This study aims to compare the outcomes of conventional versus sutureless repair techniques in Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Drainage.

Methods:

In this retrospective single-centre analysis (2012–2022), we evaluated children who underwent conventional or sutureless repair for isolated total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage, excluding complex cardiac anomalies and incomplete data. Patients were categorised into conventional (Group C, n = 58) and sutureless (Group S, n = 41) groups. Primary outcomes included mortality, morbidity, and post-operative complications. Statistical analysis included Mann–Whitney U, chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests where appropriate.

Results:

Supracardiac type predominated in both groups (53.4% in Group C and 70.7% in Group S), with higher cardiac type frequency in Group C (24.1% versus 2.4%, p = 0.016). Early complications occurred in 58.5% versus 53.4% of cases in Groups S and C, respectively (p = 0.767). The mortality rate (17.2% versus 14.6%, p = 0.944) and post-operative pulmonary venous obstruction (21.2% versus 19.0%, p = 0.809) were higher in Group C, though not significantly. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass times were comparable between groups (105 versus 89 minutes, p = 0.424).

Conclusions:

In this comprehensive analysis of paediatric Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Drainage repair, both conventional and sutureless techniques demonstrated comparable safety profiles and clinical outcomes. These findings suggest that surgical approach selection should be individualised based on patient characteristics and surgeon expertise. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these observations.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Zhu, Y, Qi, H, Jin, Y. Comparison of conventional and primary sutureless surgery for repairing supracardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage. J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 14 ( 1): 34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulz, A, Wu, DM, Ishigami, S, et al. Outcomes of total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage repair in neonates and the impact of pulmonary hypertension on survival. JTCVS Open 2022; 12: 335343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xia, J, Ma, K, Ge, H, et al. Outcomes of surgical repair of total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage: role of primary sutureless technique. Pediatr Cardiol 2021; 42 ( 6): 13161323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yong, MS, Zhu, MZL, d’Udekem, Y, et al. Outcomes of total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage repair in neonates with univentricular circulation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2018; 27 ( 5): 756760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yong, MS, Yaftian, N, Griffiths, S, et al. Long-term outcomes of total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage repair in neonates and infants. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105 ( 4): 12321238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, G, Zhu, Z, Chen, J, et al. Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: the current management strategies in a pediatric cohort of 768 patients. Circulation 2017; 135 ( 1): 4858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sughimoto, K, Miyaji, K, Oka, N, et al. Conventional repair of total anomalous venous drainage without primary sutureless technique: surgical tips to prevent pulmonary vein obstruction. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 66 ( 7): 405410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanagawa, B, Alghamdi, AA, Dragulescu, A, et al. Primary sutureless repair for “simple” total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: midterm results in a single institution. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141 ( 6): 13461354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morozov, AA, Movsesyan, RR, Latypov, AK, et al. Peculiarities of histological structure of pulmonary veins in patients with total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage as morphological substrates relating to formation of postoperative pulmonary venous obstruction. Bull Exp Biol Med 2020; 168 ( 5): 699703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, G, Zhu, F, Wen, C, et al. Single-institution outcomes of surgical repair of infracardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous connection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 161 ( 4): 14081417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, BR, Ho, DY, Faerber, JA, et al. Repair of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: risk factors for postoperative obstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 108 ( 1): 122129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harada, T, Nakano, T, Oda, S, et al. Surgical results of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection repair in 256 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2019; 28 ( 3): 421426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caldarone, CA, Najm, HK, Kadletz, M, et al. Relentless pulmonary vein stenosis after repair of total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66 ( 5): 15141520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalfa, D, Belli, E, Bacha, E, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors for postsurgical pulmonary vein stenosis in the current era. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 156 ( 1): 278286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lo Rito, M, Gazzaz, T, Wilder, T, et al. Repair type influences mode of pulmonary vein stenosis in total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100 ( 2): 654662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, C, Ou, Y, Zhuang, J, et al. Comparison of sutureless and conventional techniques to repair total anomalous pulmonary venous connection. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 28 ( 2): 473484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tremblay, C, Yoo, SJ, Mertens, L, et al. Sutureless versus conventional pulmonary vein repair: a magnetic resonance pilot study. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105 ( 4): 12481254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yun, TJ, Coles, JG, Konstantinov, IE, et al. Conventional and sutureless techniques for management of the pulmonary veins: evolution of indications from postrepair pulmonary vein stenosis to primary pulmonary vein anomalies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129 ( 1): 167174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacour-Gayet, F. Surgery for pulmonary venous obstruction after repair of total anomalous pulmonary venous return. In Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu, 2006: 4550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, UK, Malhotra, A, Kothari, SS, et al. A suggested new surgical classification for mixed totally anomalous pulmonary venous connection. Cardiol Young 2007; 17 ( 4): 342353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, G, Meng, B, Zhang, C, et al. Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection in 80 patients: primary sutureless repair and outcomes. Front Surg 2023; 9: 1086596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thanh, DQL, Giau, HTN, Huong, TNG, et al. Sutureless closure versus conventional technique in the primary surgery of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Cardiol 2022; 43 ( 5): 943951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shentu, J, Shi, G, Zhang, Q, et al. Surgical repair of neonatal total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: a single institutional experience with 241 cases. JTCVS Open 2023; 16: 739754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qiu, ZH, Liao, LM, Xiao, J, et al. A modified approach with caval transection for supracardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: comparison between conventional and sutureless surgery in 173 patients. Pediatr Cardiol 2021; 42 ( 5): 10021009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kai, L, Xiaoyang, Z, Jinghao, Z, et al. Outcomes of reinterventions for children with postoperative pulmonary venous restenosis. Pediatr Cardiol 2019; 40 ( 5): 965972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacour-Gayet, F. Re: primary sutureless repair for infracardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous connection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 59 ( 5): 966967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durandy, Y. Warm pediatric cardiac surgery: European experience. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2010; 18 ( 4): 386395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed