Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:12:49.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of interventricular septal motion by cross-sectional echocardiography in patients with isolated atrial septal defects within the oval fossa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Michael Vogel ,
Karin Schulze  and
Konrad Bühlmeyer
Michael Vogel*
Affiliation:
Klinik fur Herz-und Kreislaufkrankheiten im Kindesalter am Deutschen Herzzentrum, München
Karin Schulze
Affiliation:
Klinik fur Herz-und Kreislaufkrankheiten im Kindesalter am Deutschen Herzzentrum, München
Konrad Bühlmeyer
Affiliation:
Klinik fur Herz-und Kreislaufkrankheiten im Kindesalter am Deutschen Herzzentrum, München
*
Priv. Doz. Dr. Michael Vogel, Kinderkardiologie am Deutschen Herzzentrum München, Lothstrasse 11, 8000München 2, Federal Republic of Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

To assess whether paradoxical (systolic anterior) motion of the interventricular septum is a true abnormality of septal contraction caused by right ventricular volume overload, we examined the regional pattern of left ventricular contraction in 20 patients with an atrial septal defect within the oval fossa using a fixed and floating reference system of analysis of wall motion. The patients, with a median age of 6.8 (3.5–13.4) years, had a Qp/Qs ratio of 3.5:1 (1.2:1–8:1). They were studied by cross-sectional echocardiography four days (3–5) before and 14.5 (3–67) days after surgical closure of the atrial septal defect. The postoperative Qp/Qs ratio was 1.1:1 (0.9:1–2:1). Regional wall motion of the left ventricle was analyzed in the parasternal short axis view at the level of the mitral valve and papillary muscles as well as in the apical four-chamber view. The endocardium was digitized manually in end-systolic and end-diastolic frames. The center of mass of this figure was calculated and connected to an outside reference point in the right ventricle. With the floating system, both centers of mass and the reference lines were superimposed, thus correcting for movement of the heart inside the thorax. With the fixed system,both end-diastolic and end-systolic frames were measured separately without correcting for movement of the heart. The left ventricle was divided in eight segments in a clockwise fashion and regional change in area was measured and compared to 40 normal age matched controls. With the floating system, left ventricular regional wall motion was normal in all patients before and after closure of the atrial septal defect and, thus, was not influenced by the change in right ventricular volume load. With the fixed system, both before and after surgical closure of the atrial septal defect, left ventricular regional wall motion was reduced in the two segments representing the basilar and middle portion of the interventricular septum. The floating system of analysis of left ventricular regional wall motion has the ability to correct for movement of the heart, which makes the supposed “abnormal” systolic anterior motion in right ventricular volume overload, a condition prevalent in patients with atrial septal defect, disappear. Thus, we conclude that the so-called paradoxical septal motion in atrial defect is an artifact. This may be caused by an increased motion of the heart but is unrelated to the volume load of the right ventricle.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , January 1992 , pp. 30 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Diamond, MA, Dillon, JC, Haine, CL, Chang, S, Feigenbaum, H. Echocardiographic features of atrial septal defect. Circulation 1971; 43: 129–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Tajik, AJ, Gau, GT, Ritter, DG, Schattenberg, TT. Echocardiographic pattern of right ventricular diastolic volume overload in children. Circulation 1972; 46: 36–45.Google Scholar
3.Kingma, I, Tyberg, JV, Smith, ER. Effects of diastolic transseptal pressure gradient on ventricular septal position and motion. Circulation 1983; 68: 1304–1314.Google Scholar
4.Weyman, AE, Wann, S, Feigenbaum, H, Dillon, JC. Mechanism of abnormal septal motion in patients with right ventricular volume overload: a cross-sectional echocardiographic study. Circulation 1976; 54: 179–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.McCann, WD, Harbold, NB, Giuliani, ER. The echocardiogram in right ventricular overload. J Am Med Assoc 1972; 221: 1243–1245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Pearlman, AS, Clark, CE, Henry, WL, Morganroth, J, Itscoitz, SB, Epstein, SL. Determinants of ventricular septal motion. Influence of relative right and left ventricular size. Circulation 1976; 54: 83–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Vincent, RN, Saurette, RH, Pelech, AN, Collins, GF. Interventricular septal motion and left ventricular function in patients with atrial septal defect. Pediatr Cardiol 1988; 9: 143–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Vogel, M, Smallhorn, JF, Stein, JI, Freedom, RM. Echocardiographic analysis of regional left ventricular wall motion in normal children and neonates. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 1409–1416.Google Scholar
9.Mann, DL, Gillam, LD, Weyman, AE. Cross sectional echocardiographic assessment of regional left ventricular performance and myocardial perfusion. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1986; 19: 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Silverman, NH, Ports, TA, Snider, RA, Schiller, NB, Carlsson, E, Heilbron, DC. Determination of left ventricular volume in children: Echocardiographic and angiographic comparisons. Circulation 1980; 62: 548–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Cloez, JL, Schmidt, KG, Birk, E, Silverman, NH. Determination of pulmonary to systemic blood flow ratio in children by a simplified Doppler echocardiographic method. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11: 825–830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Sanders, SP, Yeager, S, Williams, RG. Measurement of systemic and pulmonary blood flow and Qp/Qs ratio using Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51: 952–956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Force, T, Bloomfield, P, O'Boyle, JE, Pietro, DA, Dunlap, RW, Khuri, SF, Parisi, AF. Quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of motion and thickening of the interventricular septum after cardiac surgery. Circulation 1983; 68: 1013–1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Weyman, AE. Interatrial and interventricular septa. In: Weyman, AE (ed). Cross-sectional Echocardiography. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1982, p 396.Google Scholar
15.Haendchen, RV, Wyatt, HL, Maurer, G, Zwehl, W, Bear, M, Meerbaum, S, Gorday, E. Quantitation of regional cardiac function by two-dimensional echocardiography. I. Patterns of contraction in the normal left ventricle. Circulation 1983; 67: 1234–1245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Moynihan, PF, Parisi, AF, Feldman, CL. Quantitative detection of regional left ventricular contraction abnormalities by two-dimensional echocardiography. I. Analysis of methods. Circulation 1981; 63: 752–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Assmann, PE, Slager, CJ, Dreysee, ST, van der Borden, SG, Oomen, JA, Roelandt, JR. Two-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of the dynamic geometry of the left ventricle: the basis for an improved model of wall motion. J Am Soc Echo 1988; 1: 393–405.Google Scholar
18.Mirro, MJ, Rogers, EW, Weyman, AE, Feigenbaum, H. Angular displacement of the papillary muscles during the cardiac cycle. Circulation 1979; 60: 327–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed