Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:25:55.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aortic root dilation in a child with Marfan syndrome and mosaic Turner syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2020

Abraham Groner*
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Asad Qadir
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Abraham Groner, Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Patients with a known genetic cause of aortic root dilation usually have a single underlying aetiology, either a single gene defect as in Marfan syndrome or chromosomal anomaly as in Turner syndrome. However, it is possible, although unlikely, for a patient to inherit multiple independent risk factors for aortic root dilation. We describe such a patient, who inherited Marfan syndrome and a very unusual form of mosaic Turner syndrome. Long-term follow-up of this patient may provide insight into the natural history of this unique genetic combination.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gawinecka, J, Schönrath, F, von Eckardstein, A. Acute aortic dissection: pathogenesis, risk factors and diagnosis. Swiss Med Weekly 2017; 147: w14489.Google ScholarPubMed
Lopez, L, Arheart, K, Colan, S, et al. Turner syndrome is an independent risk factor for aortic dilation in the young. Pediatrics 2008; 6: e1622-e1627.10.1542/peds.2007-2807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Mansoury, M, Barrenas, M, Bryman, I, et al. Chromosomal mosaicism mitigates stigmata and cardiovascular risk factors in Turner Syndrome. Clin Endocrinol 2007; 66: 744751.10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02807.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gravholt, CH, Andesen, NH, Conway, GS, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: proceedings from the 2016 Cincinnati International Turner Syndrome Meeting. Eur J Endocrinol 2017; 177: G1-G70.10.1530/EJE-17-0430CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thauvin-Robinet, C, De Monleon, J, Nivelon-Chevallier, A, Petit, A, Huet, F. Association of Marfan’s Syndrome and Turner’s Syndrome. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2001; 14: 16611663.10.1515/JPEM.2001.14.9.1661CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ornek, D, Aydin, G, Kahveci, K, Çi, F, Dikmen, B. Anesthetic management of a child with both Marfan syndrome and Turner syndrome. J Anesthesiol 2012; 26: 442444.Google ScholarPubMed
Dietz, H, Loeys, B, Carta, L, Ramirez, F. Recent progress towards a molecular understanding of Marfan syndrome. Am J Med Genetics 2005; 139C: 49.Google ScholarPubMed
Franken, R, den Hartog, AW, de Waard, V, et al. Circulating transforming growth factor-β as a prognostic biomarker in Marfan syndrome. Int J Cardiol 2013; 168: 24412446.10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.03.033CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habashi, J, Judge, D, Holm, T, et al. Losartan, an AT1 antagonist, prevents aortic aneurysm in a mouse model of Marfan syndrome. Science 2006; 312: 117121.10.1126/science.1124287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacro, RV, Dietz, HC, Sleeper, LA, et al. Atenolol versus losartan in children and young adults with Marfan’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 20612071.10.1056/NEJMoa1404731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbitt, H, Morris, SA, Gravholt, CH, et al. TIMP3 and TIMP1 are risk genes for bicuspid aortic valve and aortopathy in Turner syndrome. PLoS Genet 2018; 14: e1007692.10.1371/journal.pgen.1007692CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gravhold, C, Landin-Wilhelmsen, K, Stochholm, K, et al. Clinical and epidemiological description of aortic dissection in Turner’s syndrome. Cardiol Young 2006; 16: 430436.Google Scholar