No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 March 2016
1 Lederman, W. R., “The Nature and Problems of a Bill of Rights,” (1959), 37 Can. Bar Rev. 4, 9. Google Scholar
2 Reference re Alberta Legislation, [1938] S.C.R. 100; [1938] 2 D.L.R. 81.
3 (1957), 7 D.L.R. (ad.) 337, 371.
4 Saumur v. Quebec, [1953] 2 S.C.R. 299; [1953] 4 D.L.R. 641; 106 G.C.C. 289.
5 Birks v. Montreal, [1955] S.C.R. 799; [1955] 5 D.L.R. 321; 113 C.C.C. 135.
6 Two recent decisions, however, give some basis for suggesting that the Supreme Court of late is taking a less liberal approach to civil liberties: Oil, Chemical and Atomic Worker International Union v. Imperial Oil Ltd., [1964] S.C.R. 651; 41 D.L.R. (ad) 485; and Robertson and Rosetanni v. The Queen, [1964] S.C.R. 651; 41 D.L.R. (2d) 485.