Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:44:59.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Symmetric Union Diagrams and Refined Spin Models

Part of: Low-dimensional topology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2018

Carlo Collari  and
Paolo Lisca
Carlo Collari
Affiliation:
Mathematical Sciences, Durham University, UK Email: [email protected]
Paolo Lisca
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Pisa, Italy Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An open question akin to the slice-ribbon conjecture asks whether every ribbon knot can be represented as a symmetric union. Next to this basic existence question sits the question of uniqueness of such representations. Eisermann and Lamm investigated the latter question by introducing a notion of symmetric equivalence among symmetric union diagrams and showing that non-equivalent diagrams can be detected using a refined version of the Jones polynomial. We prove that every topological spin model gives rise to many effective invariants of symmetric equivalence, which can be used to distinguish infinitely many Reidemeister equivalent but symmetrically non-equivalent symmetric union diagrams. We also show that such invariants are not equivalent to the refined Jones polynomial and we use them to provide a partial answer to a question left open by Eisermann and Lamm.

MSC classification

Primary: 57M27: Invariants of knots and 3-manifolds
Secondary: 57M25: Knots and links in $S^3$
Type
Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 451 - 468
Copyright
© Canadian Mathematical Society 2018 

Footnotes

The first author was partially supported by an Indam grant, and hosted by the IMT in Toulouse, during the early stages of this paper.

References

de la Harpe, Pierre, Spin models for link polynomials, strongly regular graphs and Jaeger’s Higman-Sims model . Pacific J. Math. 162(1994), no. 1, 57–96.Google Scholar
Eisermann, Michael and Lamm, Christoph, Equivalence of symmetric union diagrams . J. Knot Theory Ramifications 16(2007), no. 07, 879–898. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218216507005555.Google Scholar
Eisermann, Michael and Lamm, Christoph, A refined Jones polynomial for symmetric unions . Osaka J. Math. 48(2011), no. 2, 333–370.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, David M. and Jones, Vaughan F. R., Metaplectic link invariants . Geom. Dedicata 31(1989), no. 2, 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00147477.Google Scholar
Jaeger, François, Matsumoto, Makoto, and Nomura, Kazumasa, Bose-Mesner Algebras Related to Type II Matrices and Spin Models . J. Algebraic Combin. 8(1998), no. 1, 39–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008691327727.Google Scholar
Jones, Vaughan, On knot invariants related to some statistical mechanical models . Pacific J. Math. 137(1989), no. 2, 311–334.Google Scholar
Jones, Vaughan F. R., On a certain value of the Kauffman polynomial . Commun. Math. Phys. 125(1989), no. 3, 459–467.Google Scholar
Nomura, Kazumasa, An algebra associated with a spin model . J. Algebraic Combin. 6(1997), no. 1, 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008644201287.Google Scholar
The Sage Developers, SageMath, the Sage Mathematics Software System (Version 8.0), http://www.sagemath.org(2017).Google Scholar