Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:53:19.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Remark by Philip Hall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

G. de B. Robinson*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The relationship between the representation theory of the full linear group GL(d) of all non-singular linear transformations of degree d over a field of characteristic zero and that of the symmetric group Sn goes back to Schur and has been expounded by Weyl in his classical groups, [4; cf also 2 and 3]. More and more, the significance of continuous groups for modern physics is being pressed on the attention of mathematicians, and it seems worth recording a remark made to the author by Philip Hall in Edmonton.

As is well known, the irreducible representations of Sn are obtainable from the Young diagrams [λ]=[λ1, λ2 ,..., λr] consisting of λ1 nodes in the first row, λ2 in the second row, etc., where λ1≥λ2≥ ... ≥λr and Σ λi = n. If we denote the jth node in the ith row of [λ] by (i,j) then those nodes to the right of and below (i,j), constitute, along with the (i,j) node itself, the (i,j)-hook of length hij.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1958

References

1. Frame, J.S., Robinson, G. de B., Thrall, R.M., The hook graphs of Sn, Can. J. Maths. 6 (1954), 316-324.Google Scholar
2. Littlewood, D.E., The Theory of Group Characters, (Oxford, 1940).Google Scholar
3. Marnaghan, F.D., The Theory of Group Representation, (Baltimore, 1938).Google Scholar
4. Weyl, H., The Classical Groups, (Princeton, 1946).Google Scholar