We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
1.Brzuchowski, J., Cichon, J., Grzegorek, E. and -Nardzewski, C. Ryll, On the existence of non-measurable unions, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., Ser. Sci. Math.27 (1979), pp. 447–448.Google Scholar
2
2.Bukovsky, L., Any partition into Lebesgue measure zero sets produces a non-measurable set, Bull, Acad. Polon. Sci., Ser. Sci. Math.6 (1979), pp. 431–435.Google Scholar
3
3.Fleissner, W. G., Current research on Q sets, Colloq. Math. Soc. Janos Bolyai 23 Topology Vol. I, pp. 413–431.Google Scholar
4
4.Fremlin, D. H., Measure-additive coverings and measurable selectors, to appear.Google Scholar
5
5.Fremlin, D. H., Measurable selections and measure-additive coverings, in Measure Theory (Oberwolfach 1981), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 945, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
6
6.Kunen, K., Random and Cohen reals, in Handbook of Set-Theoretic Topology, North Holland, 1984.Google Scholar
7
7.Prikry, K., On images of the Lebesgue measure, unpublished manuscript, 1977.Google Scholar
8
8.Rothberger, F., Eine Àquivalenz zwischen der Kontinuumhypothese und der Existenz der Lusinschen und Sierpihskischen Mengen, Fund. Math.30 (1938), pp. 215–217.Google Scholar