Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T18:28:34.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Weak Global Dimension of Pseudovaluation Domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

David E. Dobbs
David E. Dobbs*
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916 U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In [7], Hedstrom and Houston introduce a type of quasilocal integral domain, therein dubbed a pseudo-valuation domain (for short, a PVD), which possesses many of the ideal-theoretic properties of valuation domains. For the reader′s convenience and reference purposes, Proposition 2.1 lists some of the ideal-theoretic characterizations of PVD′s given in [7]. As the terminology suggests, any valuation domain is a PVD. Since valuation domains may be characterized as the quasilocal domains of weak global dimension at most 1, a homological study of PVD's seems appropriate. This note initiates such a study by establishing (see Theorem 2.3) that the only possible weak global dimensions of a PVD are 0, 1, 2 and ∞. One upshot (Corollary 3.4) is that a coherent PVD cannot have weak global dimension 2: hence, none of the domains of weak global dimension 2 which appear in [10, Section 5.5] can be a PVD.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , 01 June 1978 , pp. 159 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1978

References

1. Dobbs, D. E. and Papick, I. J., When is D + M coherent?, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 56 (1976), 51-54.Google Scholar
2. Dobbs, D. E., On going-down for simple overrings, II, Comm. in Algebra 1 (1974), 439-458.Google Scholar
3. Dobbs, D. E., On the global dimensions ofD + M, Canad. Math. Bull. 18 (1975), 657-660.Google Scholar
4. Dobbs, D. E., Divided rings and going-down, Pac. J. Math. 67 (1976), 353-363.Google Scholar
5. Dobbs, D. E., Coherence, ascent of going-down and pseudo-valuation domains, submitted for publication.Google Scholar
6. Gilmer, R. and Huckuba, J. A., A-rings, J. Algebra 28 (1974), 414-432.Google Scholar
7. Hedstrom, J. R. and Houston, E. G., Pseudo-valuation domains, Pac. J. Math., to appear.Google Scholar
8. Sally, J. D. and Vasconcelos, W. V., Flat ideals, I, Comm. in Algebra 3 (1975), 531-543.Google Scholar
9. Vasconcelos, W. V., Divisor theory in module categories, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974.Google Scholar
10. Vasconcelos, W. V., The rings of dimension two, Dekker, New York, 1976.Google Scholar