Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:38:02.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On an Inversion Operator for the Fourier Transformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

P. G. Rooney
P. G. Rooney*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In an earlier paper [1] we presented a representation theory for the Fourier transformation defined by

1.1

for functions f in certain function spaces. This theory made use of an operator

1.2

where k = 1, 2,…, and it was stated without proof that this operator is an inversion operator for the Fourier transformation; that is, that under certain conditions

1.3

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , 01 May 1960 , pp. 157 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1960

References

1. Rooney, P. G., On the representation of functions as Fourier transforms, Canad. J. Math. 11 (1959), 168-174.10.4153/CJM-1959-022-7Google Scholar
2. Rooney, P. G., On the inversion of general transformations, Canad. Math. Bull. 2 (1959), 19-24.10.4153/CMB-1959-005-3Google Scholar
3. Titchmarsh, E. C., The Theory of Functions, 2nd edition (Oxford, 1939).Google Scholar
4. Titchmarsh, E. C., The Theory of Fourier Integrals, 2nd edition (Oxford, 1948).Google Scholar
5. Widder, D. V., The Laplace Transform (Princeton, 1941).Google Scholar