Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:43:41.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-Parallelizability of Grassmann Manifolds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

S. Trew
Affiliation:
University of Calgary Calgary, Alberta, Canada
P. Zvengrowski
Affiliation:
University of Calgary Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The fact that no real Grassmann manifolds Gk(Rn) are parallelizable (or even stably parallelizable) except for the obvious cases G1R2≅S1, G1(R4)≅G3(R4) ≅ RP3, and G1(R8)≅ G7(R8) ≅ RP7 was first noted by Hiller and Stong. Their work in turn depends on induction and the work of Oproiu, who examined detailed calculations of Stiefel-Whitney classes for k = 2, 3. In this note we give a short proof of this result, using elementary results from K-theory, that also covers the complex and quaternionic Grassmann manifolds.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1984

References

1. Adams, J. F., Vector fields on spheres, Annals of Math. 75 (1962), 602-632.Google Scholar
2. Fujii, M., KO-groups of projective spaces, Osaka J. Math. 4 (1967), 141-149.Google Scholar
3. Hiller, H. and Stong, R. E., Immersion dimension for real Grassmannians, Math. Ann. 155 (1981), 361-367.Google Scholar
4. Hoggar, S. G., On KO theory of Grassmannians, Quart. J. Math. Oxford (2), 20 (1969), 447-463.Google Scholar
5. Lam, K. Y., A formula for the tangent bundle of flag manifolds and related manifolds, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 213 (1975), 305-314.Google Scholar
6. Oproiu, V., Some non-embedding theorems for the Grassmann manifolds G2,n and G3,n , Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 20 (1977), 177-185.Google Scholar