Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:23:17.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factorization Tests and Algorithms Arising from Counting Modular Forms and Automorphic Representations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2019

Miao Gu
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA Email: [email protected]
Greg Martin
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2 Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A theorem of Gekeler compares the number of non-isomorphic automorphic representations associated with the space of cusp forms of weight $k$ on $\unicode[STIX]{x0393}_{0}(N)$ to a simpler function of $k$ and $N$, showing that the two are equal whenever $N$ is squarefree. We prove the converse of this theorem (with one small exception), thus providing a characterization of squarefree integers. We also establish a similar characterization of prime numbers in terms of the number of Hecke newforms of weight $k$ on $\unicode[STIX]{x0393}_{0}(N)$.

It follows that a hypothetical fast algorithm for computing the number of such automorphic representations for even a single weight $k$ would yield a fast test for whether $N$ is squarefree. We also show how to obtain bounds on the possible square divisors of a number $N$ that has been found not to be squarefree via this test, and we show how to probabilistically obtain the complete factorization of the squarefull part of $N$ from the number of such automorphic representations for two different weights. If in addition we have the number of such Hecke newforms for even a single weight $k$, then we show how to probabilistically factor $N$ entirely. All of these computations could be performed quickly in practice, given the number(s) of automorphic representations and modular forms as input.

Type
Article
Copyright
© Canadian Mathematical Society 2018 

Footnotes

The second author’s work is partially supported by a National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant.

References

Agrawal, M., Kayal, N., and Saxena, N., PRIMES is in P . Ann. of Math. (2) 160(2004), no. 2, 781793. https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2004.160.781.Google Scholar
Casandjian, C., Challamel, N., Lanos, C., and Hellesland, J., Reinforced concrete beams, columns and frames: mechanics and design. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013, 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118639511.Google Scholar
Gekeler, E.-U., A remark on dimensions of spaces of modular forms . Arch. Math. (Basel) 65(1995), no. 6, 530533. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01194172.Google Scholar
The LMFDB Collaboration, The L-functions and Modular Forms Database. http://www.lmfdb.org/ModularForm/GL2/Q/holomorphic.Google Scholar
Martin, G., Dimensions of the spaces of cusp forms and newforms on 𝛤0(N) and 𝛤1(N) . J. Number Theory 112(2005), no. 2, 298331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2004.10.009.Google Scholar
Rosser, J. B. and Schoenfeld, L., Approximate formulas for some functions of prime numbers . Illinois J. Math. 6(1962), 6494.Google Scholar
Shoup, V., A computational introduction to number theory and algebra . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165464.Google Scholar