Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:58:31.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classification of Finite Group-Frames and Super-Frames

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Deguang Han
Deguang Han*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32163, U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Given a finite group $G$, we examine the classification of all frame representations of $G$ and the classification of all $G$-frames, i.e., frames induced by group representations of $G$. We show that the exact number of equivalence classes of $G$-frames and the exact number of frame representations can be explicitly calculated. We also discuss how to calculate the largest number $L$ such that there exists an $L$-tuple of strongly disjoint $G$-frames.

Keywords

42C1546C0547B10framesgroup-framesframe representationsdisjoint frames
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , 01 March 2007 , pp. 85 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2007

References

[1] Aldroubi, A., Larson, D., Tang, W.-S. and Weber, E., Geometric aspects of frame representations of abelian group. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 356(2004), no. 12, 4767–4786.Google Scholar
[2] Balan, R., A study of Weyl-Heisenberg and wavelet frames, Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, 1998 Google Scholar
[3] Balan, R., Density and redundancy of the noncoherent Weyl-Heisenberg superframes. In: The Functional and Harmonic Analysis of Wavelets and Frames, Contemp.Math. 247, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999, pp. 29–41.Google Scholar
[4] Benedetto, J. and Fickkus, M., Finite tight frames. Adv. Comput. Math. 18(2003), 357–385.Google Scholar
[5] Casazza, P., Custom building finite frames. In: Wavelets, Frames and Operator Theory, Contemp. Math. 345, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004, pp. 61–86.Google Scholar
[6] Casazza, P., Fickus, M., Tremain, J. C., and E.Weber, The Kadison-Singer problem in mathematics and engineering. A detailed account. In: Operator Theory, Operator Algebras and Applications. ContemporaryMath. American mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006, to appear.Google Scholar
[7] Casazza, P. and Kovačević, J., Uniform tight Frames for signal processing and communications. In: Proc. SPIE Conference onWavelet Applications in Signal and Image Processing, San Diego, CA, 2001, pp. 512–521.Google Scholar
[8] Casazza, P. and Kovačević, J., Uniform tight frames with erasures. Adv. Comput. Math. 18(2003), 387–430.Google Scholar
[9] Eldar, Y. and Bölcskei, H., Geometrically uniform frames. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 49(2003), no. 4, 993–1006.Google Scholar
[10] Gabardo, J.-P. and Han, D., Frame representations for group-like unitary operator systems. J. Operator Theory, 49(2003), no. 2, 223–244.Google Scholar
[11] Gabardo, J.-P. and Han, D., Subspace Weyl-Heisenberg frames. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 7(2001), no. 4, 419–433.Google Scholar
[12] Gabardo, J.-P. and Han, D., The uniqueness of the dual of Weyl-Heisenberg subspace frames. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 17(2004), no. 2, 226–240.Google Scholar
[13] Gabardo, J.-P., Han, D. and Larson, D., Gabor frames and operator algebras. In: Proc. SPIE Conference on Wavelet Applications in Signal and Image Processing, San Diego, CA, 2000, pp. 337–345.Google Scholar
[14] Goyal, V. K., Kovačević, J. and Kelner, J. A., Quantized frame expansions with erasure. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 10(2001), no. 3, 203–233.Google Scholar
[15] Han, D., Approximations for Gabor and wavelet frames. Trans. Amer.Math. Soc. 355(2003), no. 8, 3329–3342.Google Scholar
[16] Han, D. and Larson, D., Frames, Bases and Group Parametrizations. Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. 697, 2000.Google Scholar
[17] Shokrollabhi, A., Hassibi, B., Hochwald, B., and Sweldens, W., Representation theory for high-rate multiple-antenna code design. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 47(2001), no. 6, 2355–2367.Google Scholar
[18] Naimark, M. A. and Stern, A. I., Theory of Group Representations. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 246, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
[19] Strohmer, T., Approximation of dual Gabor frames, window decay, and wireless communications. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 11(2001), no. 2, 243–262.Google Scholar