Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:32:14.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Algebraic Characterization of Remainders of Compactifications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

James Hatzenbuhler
Affiliation:
Moorhead State UniversityMoorhead, Minnesota56560
Don A. Mattson
Affiliation:
Moorhead State UniversityMoorhead, Minnesota56560
Walter S. Sizer
Affiliation:
Moorhead State UniversityMoorhead, Minnesota56560
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let X be a locally compact, completely regular Hausdorff space. In this paper it is shown that all compact metric spaces are remainders of X if and only if the quotient ring C*(X)/C(X) contains a subring having no primitive idempotents.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1983

References

1. Chandler, R. E., Continua as remainders, revisited, Gen. Top. and its Applications 8 (1978), 6366.Google Scholar
2. Chandler, R. E., Hausdorff compactifications, Dekker, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
3. Chandler, R. E. and Tzung, Fu-Chein, Reminaders in Hausdorff compactifications, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 70 (2) (1978), 196202.Google Scholar
4. Gillman, L. and Jerison, M., Rings of continuous functions, Springer-Verlag, 1977 (reprint).Google Scholar
5. Hatzenbuhler, J. and Mattson, D. A., Spaces for which all compact metric spaces are remainders, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 82 (3) (1981), 478480.Google Scholar
6. Lambek, J., Lecture on rings and modules, Blaisdell, Waltham, Ma., 1966.Google Scholar
7. Magill, K. D. Jr, Countable compactifications, Canad. J. Math. 18 (1966), 616620.Google Scholar
8. Magill, K. D., A note on compactification, Math. Z. 94 (1966), 322325.Google Scholar
9. Rogers, J. W. Jr On compactifications with continua as remainders, Fund. Math. 70 (197), 711.Google Scholar