Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:36:32.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Status, Age, and Gender: Perceptions of Old and Young People1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Ian D. Graham  and
Paul M. Baker
Ian D. Graham
Affiliation:
University of Victoria
Paul M. Baker
Affiliation:
University of Victoria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several writers have suggested that there is an inverted U-curve of status or prestige across the lifespan in Western society. The old and the young are apparently accorded less status than persons in midlife, and women are seen as having less status than men.

In this study of 198 older individuals (mean age 67), the same inverted U-curve was found, but gender differences were very small. Much less extreme status ratings were given by this older sample than by the earlier samples of young adults. Also, status ratings were again mostly unaffected by respondents' characteristics such as age, sex, marital status, or social class. Older adults, therefore, seem to accept the broad cultural views of age stratification, but are slightly more egalitarian than the young.

Résumé

Plusieurs auteurs ont suggéré la présence d'une courbe-U invertie au niveau du statut ou du prestige pendant la durée d'une vie dans les pays occidentaux. Le statut accordé aux jeunes et aux vieux serait inférieur à celui des personnes d'âge moyen et les femmes se verraient accorder un statut inférieur à celui des hommes.

Dans cette étude qui regroupe 198 personnes d'âge avancé, (moyenne d'âge 67) la présence de la courbe-U invertie est vérifiée, cependant les différences entre les deux sexes sont minimes. Cet échantillon comprenant des gens d'âge avancé fournit des notations de statut beaucoup moins extrêmes que celles rendues par d'autres échantillons regroupant des jeunes adultes. En plus, ces notations ne sont relativement pas influencées par les caractéristiques des participants, tel l'âge, le sexe, la situation de famille, ou le niveau social. En conclusion, les adultes d'âge avancé semblent accepter une notion culturelle générale sur la stratification des âges, mais ils sont légèrement plus égalitaires que les jeunes.

Keywords

Prestigestereotypesattitudesageismhumans
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , Fall/automne 1989 , pp. 255 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, P. (1983). Ageism, sex and age: a factorial survey approach. Canadian Journal of Aging, 2, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. (1985). The status of age. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 506–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron, P. (1970). The generation gap: which generation is believed powerful versus generational members' self-appraisals of power. Developmental Psychology, 3, 403–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Counts, G. (1925). The social status of occupations: a problem of vocational guidance. The School Review, 33, 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowd, J. (1975). Aging as exchange: a preface to theory. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 584–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinman, S. and Coon, R. (1983). The effect of status on the evaluation of behavior. Research on Aging 5, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, R.L. and Smith, C.R. (1966). Values, status and professions. Sociometry, 29, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, R., Seigel, P. and Rossi, P. (1964). Occupational prestige in the United States, 1925–1963. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, B. and Shorter, R. (1972). The ratio measurement of social status. Social Forces, 50, 499–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liker, J. (1982). Family prestige judgments: bringing in real world complexities. In Rossi, P. and Nock, S. (Eds.), Measuring Social Judgments. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Linton, R. (1942). Age and sex categories. American Sociological Review, 7, 589–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loether, H. and McTavish, D. (1980). Descriptive and Inferential Statistics: an Introduction. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Martin, J. and Gray, L. (1971). Measurement of relative variation: sociological examples. American Sociological Review, 36, 496–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmore, E. (1975). The Honorable Elders Revisited. Durham, N.C.: Duke University.Google Scholar
Palmore, E. and Maeda, D. (1985). The Honorable Elders Revisited. Durham, N.C.: Duke University.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1942). Age and sex in social structure of the U.S. American Sociological Review, 7, 604–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nock, S. (1982). Family social status: consensus on characteristics. In Rossi, P. and Nock, S. (Eds.) Measuring Social Judgments. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Nock, S. and Rossi, P. (1978). Ascription versus achivement in the attribution of family social status. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 565–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NORC. Jobs and occupations: a popular evaluation. (1961). In Bendix, R. and Lipset, S. (Eds.) Class Status and Power, N.Y.: Free press.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. and Nock, S. (1982). Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. and Brown, I. (1975). A lifespan look at person perceptions and its relationship to communicative interaction. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 461–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. (1943). An empirical scale of prestige status of occupations. American Journal of Sociology, 8, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgerson, W.S. (1958). Theory and Methods of Scaling. N.Y.: Wiley.Google Scholar
Treiman, D. (1977). Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. N.Y.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, J., Evans, L. and Munley, A. (1980). Aging and Society. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Youmans, E.G. (1971). Generational perceptions of life cycle stages in an urban/rural area. Gerontologist, 1, 284–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar