Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:37:57.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Security for Social Security –Is Privatization the Answer?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Robert L. Brown
Robert L. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The parallels between the funding of an individual pension plan and a paygo social security system are presented. In each plan, the total expected value of benefits can exceed the total expected value of contributions. For the individual pre-funded plan this is true because of the discount factor, δ, representing investment income earnings. For the paygo social security system, the analogous “discount” factor is denoted r, the total of real growth rates of the labour force and real productivity gains per worker, that is, real growth in wealth production. The paper then presents arguments to show that a fully-funded social security scheme is no more secure economically than a paygo scheme. Both schemes rely on the ability of the economy to create and transfer wealth. That is, security for social security does not lie in privatization. The paper also reviews the Reform Party's proposal for a “Super RRSP” replacement for social security and analyses its advantages and disadvantages.

Résumé

Cet article établit un parallèle entre l'établissement d'un régime individuel de retraite et un système de sécurité sociale par répartition. Dans chaque cas, la valeur totale de la rente prévue peut dépasser la valeur totale prévue des cotisations. C'est une réalité qui s'avère juste dans le cas d'un régime individuel pré-financé à cause du facteur de réduction, δ, représentant les revenus de placement acquis. Dans le cas du système par répartition, le facteur de «réduction» parallèle est représenté par r, le total du taux de croissance réelle de la population active et des gains de productivité réelle par travailleur, soit la croissance réelle de la production de richesses. On explique ensuite qu'un système de sécurité sociale pleinement subventionné n'offre pas plus de sécurité économique qu'un système par répartition. En effet, les deux systèmes s'appuient sur la capacité économique de génération et de transfert de richesses. La garantie de sécurité sociale ne repose donc pas sur la privatisation. On examine plus loin la proposition du Parti réformiste de «super R.E.É.R.» pour remplacer la sécurité sociale. On en analyse les avantages et les désavantages.

Keywords

Population AgingBaby-boom/Baby-bustSocial Security FinancingPay-as-you-goC/QPP ReformVieillissement de la populationbaby-boom/effondrement de la natalitéfinancement de la securité socialepaiement par répartitionréforme du RPC/RRQ
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , Fall/Automne 1997 , pp. 499 - 518
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaron, H.J. (1982). Economic effects of social security. Washington, DC: The Brook-ings Institute.Google Scholar
Ambachtsheer, K. (1995). The Ambachtsheer letter, #157. Toronto.Google Scholar
Barr, N. (1987). The economics of the welfare state. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Beattie, R., & McGillivray, W. (1995). A risky strategy: Reflections on the World Bank Report averting the old age crisis. International Labor Office and International Social Security Association. International Social Security Review, 3–4.Google Scholar
Brown, J.D. (1972). An American philosophy of social security. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R.L. (1977). Introduction to the mathematics of demography (3rd ed.). Winsted, CT: ACTEX Publications.Google Scholar
Brown, R.L., & Bilodeau, C. (1996). The Canadian wealth transfer index. University of Waterloo, Institute of Insurance and Pension Research, #96–02.Google Scholar
Burbidge, J. (1987). Social security in Canada: An economic appraisal. Canadian Tax Foundation, No. 79. Toronto.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute of Actuaries. (1993). Canadian retirement income social security programs. Report of the Task Force on Social Security Funding. November, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute of Actuaries. (1995). Troubled tomorrows — The report of the Canadian Institute of Actuaries Task Force on Retirement Savings. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-P. (1987). Making assets out of tomorrow's elderly. The Gerontologist, 27(4), 410–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daly, M. (1981). The effect of the Canada pension plan on personal retirement saving: Some new evidence from cross-section tax data. Ottawa: Economic Council of Canada.Google Scholar
Denton, F.T., & Spencer, B.G. (1984). Prospective changes in the population and their implications for government expenditure, 1984. QSEP Research Report No. 98 (June), McMaster University, Program for Quantitative Studies in Economics and Population.Google Scholar
Foot, D.K. (1982). Public expenditures, population aging and economic dependency in Canada. Toronto: Institute for Policy Analysis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Marshall, V.W. (1987). Aging in Canada, social perspectives (2nd ed.). Markham: Fitzhenry and Whiteside.Google Scholar
Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions. (1995). Canada Pension Plan fifteenth actuarial report as at December 31, 1993, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Province of Ontario. (1979). Issues in pension policy. Ministry of Treasury and Economics, Ontario Treasury Studies No. 16.Google Scholar
Record, Society of Actuaries. (1988). Volume 14, No. 1. Society of Actuaries, Chicago.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation. Reprinted in 1971 (edited by Hartwell, R.M.). England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Rosa, J.-J. (1982). The world crisis in social security. California: Fondation Nationale d'économie politique and Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada (Nagnur Dhruva). (1986). Longevity and historical life tables 1921–1981 (abridged), Canada and the provinces, 1986. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services.Google Scholar
Task Force on Retirement Income Policy. (1979). The retirement income system in Canada: Problems and alternative policies for reform. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply Cand Services.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R., & Adams, O. (1983). Health expectancy in Canada, late 1970s. Demographic, regional and social dimensions. American Journal of Public Health, 73(a), 1073–1080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed