Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:17:54.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rural Long-term Care Work, Gender, and Restructuring*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2011

Belinda Leach  and
Gillian Joseph
Belinda Leach*
Affiliation:
University of Guelph
Gillian Joseph
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo
*
†Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to / La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à: Belinda Leach, Ph.D. College of Social and Applied Human Sciences University of Guelph 50 Stone Rd. East Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Restructuring – the introduction of changes that alter the way health care is delivered for maximum efficiency and least cost – layered with rurality and with rural gender ideologies and practices, results in rural long-term care settings that have particular consequences for the women working in them, and for the residents and communities that they serve. This research investigated how rurality affects the implementation of patient classification in Ontario long-term care homes. Methods involved interviews and focus groups with front-line long-term care workers, administrators, and key participants. The findings revealed that rural long-term care delivery takes place when a restructured work environment intersects with gender ideologies and practices that take on particular characteristics when developed and sustained in a rural context. These factors shape the labor market and working conditions for rural women. We argue that this produces a uniquely rural experience for long-term care workers and conclude that those implementing classification systems must consider contextual factors as well as practical and financial exigencies.

Résumé

La restructuration – l’introduction de changements qui modifient la façon dont les soins de santé sont délivrés pour optimiser l’éfficacité à moindre coût – s’ajoutant à la ruralité et aux idéologies et pratiques sexistes des milieux ruraux produit des établissements de soins longue durée dont les environnements ne sont pas sans conséquences particulières pour leur personnel féminin et pour les résidents et les communautés qu’ils desservent.

Cette étude avait pour but d’évaluer dans quelle mesure la ruralité affecte la mise en place de la classification des patients dans les foyers de soins longue durée en Ontario. La méthodologie de l’étude comprenait des entretiens et des groupes de travail avec du personnel de soins longue durée directement en contact avec les patients, des administrateurs et des informateurs clés en première ligne. Les conclusions de l’étude ont montré que l’offre des soins de santé de longue durée en milieu rural a lieu lorsqu’un environnement de travail restructuré rejoint les idéologies et pratiques qui prennent des caractéristiques particulières lorsque celles-ci ont été developpées et soutenues dans un contexte rural. Ces facteurs determinent le marché du travail et les conditions de travail des femmes en milieu rural. Nous défendons que ceci produit une expérience rurale unique pour le personnel des soins longue durée, et nous concluons que ceux qui mettent en place les systèmes de classification doivent prendre en compte les facteurs contextuels tout autant que les exigences pratiques et financières.

Keywords

maisons de soins infirmierspersonnel de soins longue duréesexesoins de santé longue durée en milieu ruralle contexte de soinsclassification des patientsvieillissementnursing homescare workgenderrural eldercarecare contextpatient classificationaging
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 211 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The study was funded by Status of Women Canada’s Policy Research Fund. We thank our co-investigator, Bonnie Hallman and research assistants Nichola Martin and Anita Marcotte for their contributions to the study.

References

Armstrong, P., & Armstrong, H. (1999). Women, privatization, and health reform: The Ontario Case. Toronto, ON, Canada: Centres of Excellence for Women’s Health Program, Women’s Health Bureau, Health Canada.Google Scholar
Armstrong, P., Amaratunga, C., Bernier, J., Grant, K., Pederson, A., & Willson, K. (2002). Exposing privatization: Women and health care reform in Canada. Aurora, ON: Garamond Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, P., & Daly, T. (2004). There are not enough hands: Conditions in Ontario’s long-term care facilities. Toronto, ON, Canada: CUPE Ontario. Retrieved March 24, 2011 fromhttp://www.cupe.ca/updir/Final_Report_Sept_04_CUPELTC-ReportEng2a.pdfGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, P., & Jansen, I. (2004). Burned out and tired: The impact of restructuring and work reorganization on workers in long-term care. CUPE and National Networks on Environments in Women’s Health. Retrieved March 24, 2011 fromhttp://www.cupe.ca/updir/Burned_out.pdfGoogle Scholar
Campbell, M., & Gregor, F. (2008). Mapping social relations: A primer in doing institutional ethnography. Toronto, ON, Canada: Garamond Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, M., & Manicom, A. (1995). Knowledge, experience, and ruling relations: Studies in the social organization of knowledge. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Auto Workers (2004). Submission of CAW on future directions for legislation governing long-term care homes to: Monique Smith, Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Health and Long-term Care. Toronto, ON, Canada: Canadian Auto Workers.Google Scholar
Canadian Nurses Association (2004). Nursing staff mix: A literature review. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Nurses Association. Retrieved March 24, 2011 fromhttp://www.cnaaiic.ca/CNA/documents/pdf/publications/Final_Staf_Mix_Literature_Review_e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Carbert, L. (1995). Agrarian feminism. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Christian Labour Association of Canada (2002). Beds are not enough: The hidden crisis in Ontario’s long-term care facilities. Mississauga, ON, Canada: Christian Labour Association of Canada.Google Scholar
Corbett, M. (2007). Learning to leave: The irony of schooling in a coastal community. Black Point, NS, Canada: Fernwood.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosato, K.E., & Leipert, B. (2006). Rural women caregivers in Canada. Rural Remote Health, 6(2), 520.Google ScholarPubMed
CUPE (2002). For the love of it: Long-term care issues in Manitoba. Report on the 1st Long-term Care Conference in Manitoba. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Union of Public Employees. Retrieved March 16, 2000, fromhttp://www.cupe.mb.ca/issues/nursing_homes_report.htmGoogle Scholar
Fuller, T., & O’Leary, S. (2008). The impact of access to transportation on the lives of rural women. Research Report. Guelph, ON, Canada: RWMC. Retrieved on March 24 2011, fromhttp://www.rwmc.uoguelph.ca/document.php?d=181Google Scholar
Joseph, G., Leach, B., & Turner, S. (2007). Caring at a distance: Working women, rural to urban migration and the compassionate care challenge. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Status of Women Canada.Google Scholar
Lakhani, N. (2009). ‘Tick-box culture’ threatens Britain’s medical research. The Independent, Sunday, January 4, 2009. Retrieved March 24, 2011 fromhttp://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/tickbox-culture-threatens-britains-medical-research-1224476.htmlGoogle Scholar
Leach, B. (1999). Transforming rural livelihoods: Gender, work and restructuring in three Ontario communities. In Neysmith, S.M. (Ed.), Restructuring caring labour: Discourse, state practice and everyday life. Toronto, ON, Canada: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leach, B. (2011). Jobs for women? Gender and class in Ontario’s ruralized auto manufacturing industry. In Pini, B. & Leach, B. (Eds.), Reshaping gender and class in rural spaces (pp. 129–143). London, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Leach, B., Hallman, B., Joseph, G., Martin, N., & Marcotte, A. (2006). The impact of long-term care patient classification systems on women workers in rural nursing homes. Report to Status of Women Canada Policy Research on Restructuring in Rural Canada. Retrieved February 16, 2009 fromhttp://www.swccfc.gc.ca/pubs/pubspr/0662437721/200608_0662437721_e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Legislative Assembly of Ontario (2003). Official report of debates (Hansard). Thursday 27 February, 2003. Standing committee on public accounts. 2002 annual report Provincial auditor: Ministry of Health and Long-term care. P-15. Toronto, ON, Canada: Legislative Assembly of Ontario.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (2006). The regulation of personal support workers. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Health Professions Regulatory Advisory Council.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (2008). People caring for people: Impacting the quality of life and care of residents of long-term care homes. Report of the Independent Review of Staffing and Care Standards for Long-Term Care Homes in Ontario. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.Google Scholar
National Advisory Council on Aging (1999). 1999 and beyond: Challenges of an aging Canadian society. Ottawa, ON, Canada: National Advisory Council on Aging.Google Scholar
National Advisory Council on Aging (2006). Seniors in Canada 2006: Report card. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
O’Brien-Pallas, L., Alksnis, C., Wang, S., Birch, S., Tomblin Murphy, G., Roy, F.A., et al. . (2003). Early retirement among RNs: Estimating the size of the problem in Canada. Longwoods Review, 1(4). Retrieved March 24, 2011 fromhttp://www.longwoods.com/content/17240Google Scholar
Ontario Health Coalition (2002). Ownership matters: Lessons from Ontario’s long-term care facilities. Hospital Employees’ Union (B.C.). Retrieved from http://www.web.net/~ohc/docs/may2702.htmGoogle Scholar
Penz, K.L., & Stewart, N.J. (2008). Differences in autonomy and nurse-physician interaction among rural and small urban acute care registered nurses in Canada. Online Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care, 8(1), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pong, R.W., & Russell, N. (2003). A review and synthesis of strategies and policy recommendations on the rural health workforce. Sudbury, ON, Canada: Centre for Rural and Northern Health Research, Laurentian University.Google Scholar
Pricewaterhouse Coopers (2001). Report of a study to review levels of service and responses to need in a sample of Ontario long term care facilities and selected comparators. Toronto, ON, Canada: Ontario Association of Non-Profit Homes, Services for Seniors and the Ontario Long Term Care Association.Google Scholar
Rachlis, M. (2007). Privatized health care won’t deliver. Toronto: ON, Canada: Wellesley Institute of Advancing Urban Health.Google Scholar
Roppel, C., Desmarais, A., & Martz, D. (2006). Farm women and Canadian agricultural policy. Ottawa, ON: Status of Women Canada.Google Scholar
Shore, V. (2007). How can our hospitals be more elder-friendly? Research and Discovery at the University of Victoria, 7(1).Google Scholar
Sinding, C. (2010). Using institutional ethnography to understand the production of health care disparities. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 656–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skillen, D.L., Heather, B., & Young, J. (2002). Reflections of rural Alberta women: Work, health, and restructuring. In Van Esterik, P. (Ed.), Head, heart and hand: Partnerships for women’s health in Canadian environments (pp. 107–126). Toronto, ON: The National Network on Environments for Women’s Health, Women’s Health Bureau, Health Canada.Google Scholar
Skinner, M.W., Rosenberg, M.W., Lovell, S.A., Dunn, J.R., Everitt, J.C., Hanlon, N., et al. . (2008). Services for seniors in small town Canada: The paradox of community. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 40(1), 80–101.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, D. (1990) Texts, facts, and femininity: exploring the relations of ruling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (2004). Commitment to care: A plan for long-term care in Ontario. Toronto, ON, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care.Google Scholar
Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry (2006). Understanding freefall: The challenge of the rural poor. Interim Report. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Government of Canada, Retrieved fromhttp://www.parl.gc.ca/39/1/parlbus/commbus/senate/com-e/agri-e/rep-e/repintdec06-e.htmGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada (2005). Rural and Small Town Canada Analysis Bulletin Catalogue no. 21-006-XIE. Vol. 5(8) (January 2005). Ottawa, ON, Canada: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Sumner, J. (2002). Sustainability and rural communities in the age of globalization: Can we learn our way out? PhD thesis, University of Guelph.Google Scholar
Szebehely, M., & Daly, T. (2009). Unheard voices, unmapped terrain: Comparative welfare research and paid care for older people in Sweden and Canada. Paper presented to the RC19 Conference, Social Policies: Local Experiments, Travelling Ideas, Montreal, August 20-22.Google Scholar
Thomson, D., Dunleavy, J., & Bruce, S. (2002). Nurse job satisfaction – factors relating to nurse satisfaction in the workplace. Report commissioned for the Canadian Nursing Advisory Committee, Ottawa, ON, Canada:Google Scholar
Winson, A.R., & Leach, B. (2002). Contingent work, disrupted lives: Labour and community in the new rural economy. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar