Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:38:57.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationship between Self-Report and Performance Measures of Function: A Systematic Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

Liliana Coman  and
Julie Richardson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The authors conducted a systematic review of studies examining correlations between assessments of function obtained using self-report and those obtained using performance-based measures for community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

Articles for this review were identified using electronic searching in MEDLINE, CINHAL, and AGELINE and hand-searching techniques. Two reviewers selected the studies that met the inclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality of the data.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria for review. Correlations between self-report and performance ranged from −0.72 to 0.60. Sixty per cent of the studies compared self-report instruments measuring disability with performance measures addressing functional limitations. In studies that assessed the same functional tasks and functional limitations using the two methods, the correlation varied between 0.60 and 0.86.

CONCLUSION

When the construct measured by the two methods was the same, the correlations were moderate to large and, therefore, measurement of functional limitations by self-report or performance probably reflected a similar assessment of function.

Résumé

Les auteurs ont procédé à un examen systématique des études portant sur la corrélation entre les évaluations de la fonction obtenues à l'aide de mesures de l'auto-évaluation et de la performance chez les personnes âgées qui résident dans la communauté.

MÉTHODES

Les articles ayant servi à cet examen ont été déterminés à l'aide de la recherche électronique des mots anglais MEDLINE, CINHAL et AGELINE et d'un dépouillage manuel. Deux réviseurs ont sélectionné les études répondant aux critères d'inclusion, extrait les données, et évalué la qualité méthodologique des données.

RÉSULTATS

Dix-sept études répondaient aux critères d'inclusion requis pour l'examen. La corrélation entre l'auto-évaluation et la performance allait de −0,72 à 0,60. Soixante pour cent des études ont comparé les instruments d'auto-évaluation utilisés pour déterminer le degré d'incapacité à l'aide de mesures de la performance portant sur la limitation fonctionnelle. Dans les études qui évaluaient la limitation fonctionnelle des mêmes tâches à l'aide des deux méthodes, la corrélation variait de 0,60 à 0,86.

CONCLUSION

Lorsque le construct mesuré à l'aide des deux méthodes était le même, la corrélation était de moyenne à élevée et la mesure des limitations fonctionnelles en fonction de l'auto-évaluation ou de la performance reflétait donc une évaluation similaire de la fonction.

Keywords

agingself-reportperformancefunctionsystematic reviewvieillissementauto-évaluationperformancefonctionexamen systématique
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , Fall/Automne 2006 , pp. 253 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, N.B., et al. (2000). Self-reported walking ability predicts functional mobility performance in frail older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 48, 1408–1413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avlund, K. (1997). Methodological challenges in measurements of functional ability in gerontological research: A review. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 9(3), 164–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brach, J.S., VanSwearingen, J.M., Newman, A.B., & Kriska, A.M. (2002). Identifying early decline of physical function in community-dwelling older women: Performance-based and self-report measures. Physical Therapy, 82(4), 320–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cress, M.E., et al. (1995). Relationship between physical performance and self-perceived physical function. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 43(2), 93–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daltroy, L.H., et al. (1995). Objectively measuring physical ability in elderly persons: The Physical Capacity Evaluation. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 558–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daltroy, L.H., Larson, M.G., Eaton, H.M., Phillips, C.B., & Liang, M.H. (1999). Discrepancies between self-reported and observed physical function in the elderly: The influence of response shift and other factors. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1549–1561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eger, M., Zellweger-Zahner, T., Schneider, M., Junker, C., Lengeler, C., & Antes, G. (1997). Language bias in randomized controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet, 350, 326–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrer, M., Lamarca, R., Orfila, F., & Alonso, J. (1999). Comparison of performance-based and self-rated functional capacity in Spanish elderly. American Journal of Epidemiology, 149, 228–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finlayson, M., Havens, B., Holm, M.B., & van Denend, T. (2003). Integrating a performance-based observation measure of functional status into a population-based longitudinal study of aging. Canadian Journal on Aging, 22(2), 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, L.P., Bandeen-Roche, K., Chaves, P.H.M., & Johnson, B.A. (2000). Preclinical mobility disability predicts incident mobility disability in older women. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 55A(1), M43–M52.Google Scholar
Fried, L.P., Young, Y., Rubin, G., & Bandeen-Roche, K. (2001). Self-reported preclinical disability identifies older women with early declines in performance and early disease. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 889–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fries, J.F., Spitz, P., Kraines, R.G., & Holman, H.R. (1980). Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 23, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, T.M., Hardy, S.E., & Williams, C.S. (2002). Underestimation of disability in community-living older persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50, 1492–1497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glass, T.A. (1998). Conjugating the “tenses” of function: Discordance among hypothetical, experimental and enacted function in older adults. Gerontologist, 38(1), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guralnik, J.M., Branch, L.G., Cummings, S.R., & Curb, J.D. (1989). Physical performance measures in aging research. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 44, M141–M146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guralnik, J.M., et al. (1994). A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 49(2), M85–M94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guralnik, J.M., & Ferrucci, L. (2003). Assessing the building blocks of function. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25(3Sii), 112–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoeymans, N., Feskens, E.J.M., van den Bos, G.A.M., & Kromhout, D. (1996). Measuring functional status: Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between performance and self-report (Zutphen Elderly Study 1990–1993). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(10), 1103–1110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoeymans, N. (1997). Reproducibility of performance-based and self-reported measures of functional status. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 52(6), M363–M368.Google ScholarPubMed
Jette, A.M., et al. (1986). The Functional Assessment Questionnaire: Reliability and validity when used in primary care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson-Kozlow, M., & Matt, G.E. (2004). What respondents recall about walking and what self-report items elicit about walking. Preventive Medicine, 38, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Judge, J.O., Schechtman, K.B., Cress, M.E., & A.T.F. Group (1996). The relationship between physical performance measures and independence in instrumental activities of daily living. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 44, 1332–1341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempen, G.I.J.M., Stevernik, N., Ormel, J., & Deeg, D.J.H. (1996). The assessment of ADL among frail elderly in an interview survey: Self-report versus performance-based tests and determinants of discrepancies. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 51B(5), P254–P260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempen, G.I.J.M., et al. (1996). Factors affecting contrasting results between self-reported and performance-based levels of physical limitations. Age and Ageing, 25, 458–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivinen, P., Sulkava, R., Halonen, P., & Nissinen, A. (1998). Self-reported and performance-based functional status and associated factors among elderly men: The Finnish cohorts of the Seven Countries Study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(12), 1243–1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, A.M., Holliday, P.J., Harvey, K.A., & Hutchinson, K.S. (1993). Functional performance measures: Are they superior to self-assessments? Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 48(5), M196–M206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagi, S.Z. (1965). Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In Sussman, M.B. (Ed.), Sociology and rehabilitation (pp. 100–113). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google ScholarPubMed
Reuben, D.B. (2004). Refining the categorization of physical functional status: The added value of combining self-reported and performance-based measures. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 59A(10), 1056–1061.Google Scholar
Reuben, D.B., & Siu, A.L. (1990). An objective measure of physical function of elderly outpatients: The Physical Performance Test. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 38, 1105–1112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reuben, D.B., Valle, L.A., Hays, R.D., & Siu, A.L. (1995). Measuring physical function in community-dwelling older persons: A comparison of self-administered, interviewer-administered and performance-based measures. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 43(1), 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozzini, E., Frisoni, G.B., Ferrucci, L., Barbisoni, P., Bertozzi, B., & Trabucchi, M. (1997). The effect of chronic diseases on physical function. Comparison between activities of daily living scales and the Physical Performance Test. Age and Ageing, 26(4), 281–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, S.E., & Reuben, D.B. (1998). Measures of functional status in community-dwelling elders. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 13, 817–823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shumway-Cook, A., Patla, A., Stewart, A.L., Ferrucci, L., Ciol, M.A., & Guralnik, J.M. (2005). Assessing environmentally determined mobility disability: Self-report versus observed community mobility. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 700–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonsick, E.M., et al. (2001). Measuring higher level physical function in well-functioning older adults: Expanding familiar approaches in the Health ABC Study. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 56A(10), M644–M649.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada (1996). Disability-free life expectancy. Ottawa, ON: Author.Google Scholar
Tabbarah, M., Crimmins, E., & Seeman, T. (2002). The relationship between cognitive and physical performance: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 57A, M228–M235.Google Scholar
van den Brink, C.L., et al. (2003). Self-reported disability and its association with performance-based limitation in elderly men: A comparison of three European countries. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51, 782–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, J.E.J., Kisinski, M., & Keller, S.D. (1996). A 12-item short form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34, 220–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed