Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:59:25.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Rejoinder to “Research in Social Gerontology in Quebec”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

François Béland
François Béland
Affiliation:
University of Montreal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Thomas and Stryckman wrote a sweeping critique, and two of their points could be particularly damaging to the substance of my text, should they be proven correct. First, they submit that researchers in social gerontology have not produced that many overviews, and in their second point, they contend that I reduce the logic of the scientific approach to mathematical formalization.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 7 , Issue 4: Francophone Research in Gerontology in Canada , Winter/hiver 1988 , pp. 336 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

Alexander, J.C. (1982). Theoretical Logic in Sociology, vol. 1: Positivism, Presuppositions and Current Controversies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, O.D. (1984). Notes on Measurement. Historical and Critical. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Gauthier, B. (1982). Analyse de cent cas de recherches évaluatives. Québec: Conseil québécois de la recherche sociale.Google Scholar