Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:44:21.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polygyny, Kin Selection and the Origins of Later-Life Frailty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Michael J. Stones
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland
Albert Kozma
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland

Abstract

A kin selection model is offered as a feasible alternative to existing formulations of the evolutionary origins of later-life frailty. An assumption made was that reproductive patterns among early human kind were of a polygynous nature, reflecting a compromise of optimal reproductive strategies between males and females. Two general characteristics of polygyny are a delayed reproductive onset for males and an accumulation of wives by older males. The model proposes that paternal frailty occasions the demise of paternal assets to male heirs, which translates into an earlier reproductive onset for those heirs. Quantification of the model demonstrates its potentiality to account for the spread of genes for frailty through kin selection.

Résumé

Présentation d'un modèle de sélection par la filiation capable de remplacer l'actuelle explication évolutive de la débilité sénile. Il est présupposé que l'activité reproductrice de l'humanité naissante était de nature polygynique, compromis entre les capacités de reproduction optimales chez l'homme et la femme. Sont caractéristiques de la polygynie l'apparition tardive de la reproduction chez l'homme et la monopolisation des femmes par les hommes âgés. Selon le modèle proposé, la débilité du père entraîne la cession des biens paternels aux fils, ce qui signifie que ceux-ci commencent à se reproduire plus tôt. La quantification du modèle démontre son aptitude à rendre compte de la transmission des gènes de la débilite ṕar la filiation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barash, D.The whisperings within: Evolution and the origin of human nature. New York: Harper and Row, 1979.Google Scholar
Borkan, G.A. & Hults, D.E., Aged appearance and behaviour: A critique of the article by Gordon D. Jensen and Fredericka B. Oakley. Gerontologisl, 1981, 22, 116118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R.The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Forbus, P.R.Aged appearance and behavior: A further comment. Gerontologisl, 1982, 22, 56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goody, J. Aging in nonindustrial societies. In Binstock, R.H. & Shanas, E. (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1977.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D.The molding of senescence by natural selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1966, 12, 1245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauser, P.M., Aging and world-wide population change. In Binstock, R.H. & Shanas, E. (Eds), Handbook of aging and the social sciences. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1977.Google Scholar
Jensen, G.D. & Oakley, F.B.Aged appearance and behavior: An evolutionary and ethological perspective. Gerontologisl, 1980, 20, 595597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, G.D. & Oakley, F.B.Dr. Jensen and Mr. Oakley reply. Gerontologisl, 1981, 22, 188–120.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J.Group selection. Quarterly Review of Biology, 1976, 51, 277283.Google Scholar
Medawar, P.B.The uniqueness of the individual. New York: Basic Books, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, L.The role of the aged in primitive societies. New Haven, Ct.: Yale University Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Williams, G.C.Pleiotropy, natural selection and the evolution of senescence. Evolution, 1957, 11, 398411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne-Edwards, V.C.Animal dispersion in relation to social behavior. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1962.Google Scholar