Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:30:31.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

M. Bernard and T. Scharf (Eds.). Critical Perspectives on Ageing Societies. Boston, MA: Polity Press, 2007.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2010

Émilie Raymond
Émilie Raymond*
Affiliation:
Université McGill et Institut national de santé publique du Québec
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews/Comptes rendus
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 466 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

Biggs, S. (2001). Toward a critical narrativity: Stories of aging in contemporary social policy. Journal of Aging Studies, 15, 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruikshank, B. (1999). The will to empower: Democratic citizens and other subjects. New York: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenson, J., & Saint-Martin, D. (2003). New routes to social cohesion? Citizenship and the social investment state. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28(1), 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, S. (2003). Critical gerontological theory: Intellectual fieldwork and the nomadic life of ideas. In Biggs, S., Hendricks, J., & Lowenstein, A. (Eds.), The need for theory: Critical approaches to social gerontology (pp. 15–31). Amityville, New York: Baywood Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kesby, M., Kindon, S., & Pain, R. (2007). Participation as a form of power. In Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place (pp. 19–25). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phillipson, C. (2006). Aging and gobalization: Issues for critical gerontology and political economy. In Baars, J., Dannefer, D., Phillipson, C., & Walker, A. (Eds.), Aging, globalization, and inequality: The new critical gerontology (pp. 43–58). Amityville: Baywood.Google Scholar
Phillipson, C., & Walker, A. (1987). The case for critical gerontology. In DiGregorio, S. (Ed.), Social gerontology: New directions (pp. 1–18). New York: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Silverman, R.M. (2005). Caught in the middle: Community development corporations and the conflict between grassroots and instrumental forms of citizen participation. Community Development, 36(2), 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, P. (1981). The structured dependency of the elderly: A creation of social policy in the twentieth century. Ageing and Society, 1(1), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar