Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:33:48.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Higher Thresholds for Elder Abuse with Age and Rural Residence*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

M.J. Stones  and
Michel Bédard
M.J. Stones*
Affiliation:
Lakehead University
Michel Bédard
Affiliation:
Lakehead University
*
Requests for offprints should be sent to: / Les demandes de tirés-a-part doivent être adressées à : M.J. Stones, Ph.D., Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada P7B 5E1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Attitudes toward elder abuse differ with age, ethnicity, profession, and training. This article introduces a threshold model in order to reconcile findings on attitudinal differences within a unifying theoretical framework. The model assumes that individuals rate the abusiveness using consistent standards but different thresholds. Predictions from the model include consistency among individuals in their ratings of different behaviours (i.e., high relative consistency), but variation in the levels of rating (i.e., systematic departures from absolute consistency).

Samples of 339 seniors and 233 professionals rated 112 items representing a wide range of abuse severity. The findings suggested high relative consistency but systematic deviations from absolute consistency, with higher ratings (i.e., lower thresholds) by professionals than seniors, and by residents of smaller (rural) rather than larger (urban) communities. The implications of the threshold model include prevention through elder-abuse education and reporting practices.

Résumé

Les attitudes vis-à-vis la violence envers les personnes âgées varient avec l'âge, l'ethnie, la profession et la formation. Cet article introduit un modèle de seuil qui tente de réconcilier les résultats découverts dans les différences en matière d'attitudes à l'intérieur d'un cadre théorique uniforme. Le modèle présume que les individus considèrent la violence à l'aide de normes convergentes mais de seuils variés. Les prédictions du modèle comprennent la cohérence parmi les individus lors de leurs considérations de comportements variés (c.-à.-d. cohérence relative élevée) ; il y a, toutefois, une variation aux niveaux du barème de notation (c.-à.-d. un écart systématique par rapport à la cohérence absolue).

Un échantillonnage de 339 personnes âgées et de 233 professionnels révèle 112 items qui représentent une variété de gravité de violence. Les résultats suggèrent une cohérence relative élevée en plus de départs systématiques de la cohérence absolue et des résultats plus élevés (c.-à.-d. des seuils inférieurs) offerts plutôt par les professionnels que les personnes âgées et par les résidents de communautés rurales plutôt que ceux de communautés urbaines. La portée du modèle de seuil comprend la prévention par la sensibilisation de la violence envers les personnes âgées et les méthodes de rapport.

Keywords

agingabuseelderlyageruralattitudesviellissementviolencepersonnes âgéesâgeruralattitudes
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , Winter/Hiver 2002 , pp. 577 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported by funding by the Family Violence Prevention Division of Health Canada (FVPD # 4887–01–90–119).

References

Administration on Aging. (1998). The national elder abuse incidence study. Final report September 1998. Washington, DC: Administration on Aging and National Center on Elder Abuse at the American Public Human Services Association.Google Scholar
Childs, H.W., Hayslip, B., Radika, L.M., & Reinberg, J.A. (2000). Young and middle-aged perceptions of elder abuse. Gerontologist, 40, 75–85.Google Scholar
Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Dowd, R.L., Sisson, R.P., & Kern, D.M. (1981). Socialization to violence among the aged. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 350–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson, M.F. (1991). Elder mistreatment: A taxonomy with definitions by Delphi. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 3, 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, M.F., Beasley, C.M., Benedict, R.H., Carlson, J.R., Craig, B.F., & Mason, S.C. (1999). Elder abuse: Some African American views. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 915–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, M.F., & Carlson, J.R. (1999a). Elder abuse: Expert and public perspectives on its meaning. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 9, 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, M.F., & Carlson, J.R. (1999b). Elder abuse: Its meaning to Caucasians, African Americans, and Native Americans. In Tatara, T. (Ed.), Understanding elder abuse in minority populations (pp, 187–204). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Jang, M., Yen, H.S., Malley-Morrison, K., & Mills, R.B. (1999). Recollections of parental acceptance and control and perceptions of elder abuse: Korean and American college students. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 19, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, P. (1996). Reporting on surveys: Information for authors and peer reviewers. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 154, 1695–1998.Google Scholar
Johnson, T.F. (1986). Critical issues in the definition of elder mistreatment. In Pillemer, K. and Wolf, R. (Eds.), Elder abuse: Conflict in the family (pp. 167–196). Dover, MA: Auburn House.Google Scholar
Kozak, J.F. (1994). Difficulties in addressing abuse and neglect in elderly patients. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 151, 1401–1403.Google ScholarPubMed
Kozak, J.F., Elmslie, T.E., & Verdon, J. (1995). Epidemiology of the abuse and neglect of seniors in Canada: A review of the national and international research literature. In Maclean, M. (Ed.), Abuse and neglect of older Canadians — Strategies for change (pp. 129–142). Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing.Google Scholar
Kozma, A., & Stones, M.J. (1995). Issues in the measurement of abuse and neglect. In Maclean, M. (Ed.), Abuse and neglect of older Canadians — Strategies for change (pp. 117–128). Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing.Google Scholar
Lithwick, M., Reis, M., Stones, M.J., Macnaughton-Osler, K., Gendron, M.J., Groves, D., et al. (1997). Exploring definitions and developing community-based projects on the awareness and prevention of elder abuse in different cultural communities. Montreal: CLSC René-Cassin and Foundation for Vital Aging.Google Scholar
Malley-Morrison, K., Yen, H.S., & Mills, R.B. (2000). Young adult styles and perceptions of elder abuse: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 15, 163–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, L., Pittaway, E., & Namiash, D. (1995). Issues in practice with respect to mistreatment of older people. In Maclean, M. (Ed.), Abuse and neglect of older Canadians — Strategies for change (pp. 5–15). Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing.Google Scholar
Mills, R.B., Vermette, V., & Malley-Morrison, K. (1998). Judgements about elder abuse and college students' relationship with grandparents. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 19, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, A., & Williams, O. (1993). Perceptions of elder abuse and help-seeking patterns among African American, Caucasian American, and Korean American elderly women. Gerontologist, 33, 386–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, B.K., & Berg, B.L. (1999). Perceptions of nursing home workers, police chiefs, and college students regarding crime against the elderly: An exploratory study. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 24,139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillemer, K., & Bachman-Prehn, R. (1991). Helping and hurting: Prediction of maltreatment of patients in nursing homes. Research on Aging, 13, 74–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podnieks, E., & Baillie, E. (1995). Education as the key to the prevention of elder abuse and neglect. In Maclean, M. (Ed.), Abuse and neglect of older Canadians — Strategies for change (pp. 81–94). Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing.Google Scholar
Stones, M.J. (1994). Rules and tools: The Meaning and measurement of elder abuse. Newfoundland: Milestones Manual.Google Scholar
Stones, M.J. (1995). Scope and definition of elder abuse and neglect in Canada. In Maclean, M. (Ed.), Abuse and neglect of older Canadians — Strategies for change (pp. 111–116). Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing.Google Scholar
Stones, M.J., & Pittman, D. (1995). Individual differences in attitudes about elder abuse: The Elder Abuse Attitude Test. Canadian Journal on Aging, 14, 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, R.S. (1999). Factors affecting elder abuse reporting to a state protective services program. Gerontologist, 39, 222–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed