Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:36:43.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Fraboni Scale of Ageism (FSA): An Attempt at a More Precise Measure of Ageism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Maryann Fraboni ,
Robert Saltstone  and
Susan Hughes
Maryann Fraboni
Affiliation:
Nipissing University College
Robert Saltstone
Affiliation:
Nipissing University College
Susan Hughes
Affiliation:
Nipissing University College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Fraboni Scale of Ageism (FSA) is introduced in this study with reports of its factor structure, internal consistency reliability, and its relationship to The Acceptance of Others Scale, The Facts on Aging Quiz, and The Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (N = 231). The FSA construct is derived from Butler's (1978) definition of ageism, and is intended to measure the affective component of attitude to supplement the cognitive aspect measured by other instruments. The FSA was found to have adequate construct validity and high internal reliability. Relationships to the other constructs measured supported the uniqueness of the FSA and revealed a lack of influence from social desirability. Sex was found to account for some variance in FSA scores.

Résumé

“The Fraboni Scale of Ageism” (FSA), de même que les rapports de son facteur du concept psychologique, de sa crédibilité de consistance interne, et de sa relation avec “The Acceptance of Others Scale”, “The Facts on Aging Quiz”, et “The Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale” (N = 231) sont présentés dans cette étude. Le concept psychologique du FSA est tiré de la définition d'âgéisme chez Butler (1978), et il veut mesurer la composante affective des attitudes, afin de compléter l'aspect cognitif mesuré par les autres instruments. Le FSA avait trouvé une validité suffisante du concept psychologique et une crédibilité interne élevée. Les rapports avec les autres concepts psychologiques mesurés ont maintenu le caractère unique du FSA et ont révélé une influence réduite de l'utilité sociale. On a remarqué que le sexe des individus expliquait quelques divergences dans les scores du FSA.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , Spring/printemps 1990 , pp. 56 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, G.W. (1958). The Nature of Prejudice. New York: Doubleday and Company.Google Scholar
Austin, D.R. (1985). Attitudes toward old: A hierarchical study. Gerontologist, 25, 431–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P.M. (1983). Ageism, sex, and age: A factorial survey approach. Canadian Journal on Aging, 2, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, R.N. (1969). Age-ism; another form of bigotry. Gerontologist, 9, 243–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, R.N. (1975). Psychiatry and the elderly: An overview. American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 893–900.Google ScholarPubMed
Butler, R.N. (1978). Thoughts on aging. American Journal of Psychiatry, 135 (Suppl), 14–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Butler, R.N. (1980). Ageism: A foreword. Journal of Social Issues, 36, 8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowne, D. & Marlowe, D. (1964). The Approval Motive. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dinkle, R.M. (1944). Attitudes of children toward supporting aged parents. American Sociological Review, 9, 370–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fey, W.F. (1955). Acceptance by others and its relation to acceptance of self and others: a revaluation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 50, 274–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fielding, E.B. (1984). Cultural scripting and aging. Transactional Analysis Journal, 14, 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtzman, J.M., & Beck, J.D. (1979). Palmore's Facts on Aging Quiz: A reappraisal. Gerontologist, 19, 116–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, G.D., & Oakley, F.B. (1982). Ageism across cultures and in perspective of sociobiologic and psychodynamic theories. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 15, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kafer, R.A., Rakowski, W., Lachman, M., & Hickey, T. (1980). Aging Opinion Survey: A report on instrument development. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 11, 319–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahana, E., Liang, J., Felton, B., Fairchild, T., & Harel, Z. (1977). Perspectives of aged on victimization, ‘ageism’, and their problems in urban society. Gerontologist, 17, 121–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kearl, M.C., Moore, K., & Osberg, J.S. (1982). Political implications of the “new ageism”. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 15, 167–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilty, K.M., & Feld, A. (1976). Attitudes toward aging and toward the needs of older people. Journal of Gerontology, 31, 586–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kogan, N. (1961). Attitudes toward old people: The development of a scale and an examination of correlates. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, J., & Levin, W.C. (1980). Ageism: Prejudice and Discrimination Against the Elderly. California: Wadsworth Inc.Google Scholar
Luszcz, M.A. (1982). Facts on Aging: An Australian validation. Gerontologist, 22, 369–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, Matthews A., Tindale, J.A., & Norris, J.E. (1984). The Facts on Aging Quiz: A Canadian validation and cross-cultural comparison. Canadian Journal on Aging, 3, 165–174.Google Scholar
McTavish, D.G. (1982). Perceptions of old people. In Manger, D., & Peterson, W.A. (Eds.), Research Instruments in Social Gerontology (pp. 533–621). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nuessel, F.H. (1982). The language of ageism. Gerontologist, 22, 273–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ontario, Welfare Council, Section on Aging. (1971). Opinions about People, Form A: Guidelines and Manual. Toronto, Ontario: Queen's Park.Google Scholar
Palmore, E. (1977). Facts on Aging: A short quiz. Gerontologist, 17, 315–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pineo, P., Porter, J., & McRoberts, H. (1977). The 1971 census and the socioeconomic classification of occupations. Canadian Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 14, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, D.C., Raciti, M.A., & Ford, C.V. (1985). Ageism in psychiatrists: Associations with gender, certification, and theoretical orientation. Gerontologist, 25, 496–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, J.P., & Shaver, P.R. (1973). Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes. Michigan: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Rosencranz, H.A.,& McNevin, T.E. (1969). A factor analysis of attitudes toward the aged. Gerontologist, 9, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salter, C.A.,& Salter, C. del L. (1976). Attitudes toward aging and behaviors toward the elderly among young people as a function of death anxiety. Gerontologist, 16, 232–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuckman, J. & Lorge, I. (1953a). Attitudes toward old people. Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 249–260.Google Scholar
Waxman, H.M., Carner, E.A.,& Klein, M. (1984). Underutilization of mental health professionals by community elderly. Gerontologist, 24, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed