Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:31:38.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equivalence of French and English Language Versions of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) among Caregivers of Persons with Dementia*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

Norm O'Rourke
Norm O'Rourke*
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, Harbour Centre
*
Requests for offprints should be sent to: / Les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à : Norm O'Rourke, Ph.D., Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University at Harbour Centre, 515 West Hastings Street, Suite #2800, Vancouver, BC V6B 5K3. ([email protected].)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) is among the most widely used depression screening measures. Existing research suggests a higher-order factor structure of responses among older adults (factors labelled depressive affect, absence of well-being, somatic symptoms, and interpersonal affect, each loading upon a second-order depression factor). The current study extends this research to ascertain whether this structure is equivalent (or invariant) between the English and French versions of the CES-D. Findings suggest that the number and relative contribution of each factor is similar for both language groups. Furthermore, interpretation of CES-D items is statistically indistinguishable for 16 of 20 items within this randomly identified, national sample of caregivers of persons with dementia. Results of this study support the higher-order factor structure of this measure and provide data in support of the reliability of responses. Furthermore, findings support the use of the CES-D in cross-cultural and comparative research with English- and French-speaking adults.

Résumé

L'échelle de dépression du Center for Epidemiologic Studies (CES-D) est un des outils les plus communs pour dépister la dépression. La recherche démontre un processus d'ordre supérieur de réponses au sein de la population des personnes âgées (les composantes étiquetés comme affectifs dépressifs, absence du bien-être, symptômes somatiques et affectifs interpersonnels se retrouvent à la catégorie des composantes de dépression du second ordre). La présente étude continue la recherche sur ce sujet et tente d'identifier si cette structure a la même valeur (ou invariante) entre la version française et la version anglaise de l'échelle. Les résultats démontrent que le nombre et la contribution relative de chaque composante sont semblables pour les deux groupes linguistiques. De plus, au sein de soignants de personnes souffrant de démence, l'interprétation des items de l'échelle est quantitativement indiscernable pour 16 des 20 composantes à même un échantillon aléatoire et national. Les résultats appuient le processus d'ordre supérieur de cette mesure en plus de fournir des données confirmant la fiabilité des réponses. Finalement, les résultats soutiennent l'utilisation de l'échelle lors de recherches interculturelles et comparatives au sein d'adulte de langue anglaise et de langue française.

Keywords

agingCenter for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D)factor structurelinguistic invariancetranslationvieillissementÉchelle de dépression du Center for Epidemiologic Studies (CES-D)composantes structurellesinvariabilité linguistiquetraduction
Type
Research Note
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , Fall/Automne 2003 , pp. 323 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) was funded by the Seniors' Independence Research Program, through the National Health Research and Development Program (NHRDP) of Health Canada (Project No. 6606–3954-MC[S]). Additional funding was provided by Pfizer Canada Incorporated, through the Medical Research Council / Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of Canada Health Activity Program; the NHRDP (Project No. 6603–1417–302 [R]); Bayer Incorporated; and the British Columbia Health Research Foundation (BCHRF Projects No. 38 [93–2] & No. 34 [96–1]). The CSHA was coordinated through the University of Ottawa and the Division of Aging and Seniors, Health Canada. An Endowed Research Fellowship received by the author from Simon Fraser University aided completion of the current study. Thanks to Dr. Philippe Cappeliez for his assistance in examining the translation of items between the English and French language versions of the CES-D.

References

Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Canadian Study of Health and Aging Working Group. (1994a). Canadian Study of Health and Aging: Study methods and prevalence of dementia. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 150, 899–913.Google Scholar
Canadian Study of Health and Aging Working Group. (1994b). Patterns of caring for people with dementia in Canada: The Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Canadian Journal on Aging, 13, 470–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousson, F., Bruchon-Schweitzer, M., Quintard, B., Nuissier, J., & Rascle, N. (1996). Analyse multidimensionnelle d'une échelle de coping: Validation française de la W.C.C. (Ways of Coping Checklist). Psychologie Française, 41, 155–164.Google Scholar
Dura, J.R., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K. (1990). Sample bias in caregiving research. Journals of Gerontology, 45, P200–P204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dura, J.R., Stukenberg, K.W., Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K. (1991). Anxiety and depressive disorders in adult children caring for demented parents. Psychology and Aging, 6, 467–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floyd, F.J., & Widaman, K.F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrer, R. & Rouillon, F. (1989). La version française de l'échelle CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale). Description et traduction de l'échelle d'autoévaluation. European Psychiatry, 4, 163–166.Google Scholar
Gallagher, D., Rose, J., Rivera, P., Lovett, S., & Thompson, L.W. (1989). Prevalence of depression in family caregivers. Gerontologist, 29, 449–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertzog, C., Van Alstine, J., Usala, P.D., Hultsch, D.F., & Dixon, R. (1990). Measurement properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in older populations. Psychological Assessment, 2, 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmelfarb, S., & Murrell, S.A. (1983). Reliability and validity of five mental health scales in older persons. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 333–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooker, K., Bowman, S.R., Padgett Coehlo, D., Lim, S.R., Kaye, J., Guariglia, R., et al. (2002). Behavioral change in persons with dementia: Relationships with mental and physical health of caregivers. Journals of Gerontology, 57, P453–P460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hybels, C.F., Blazer, D.G., & Pieper, C.F. (2001). Toward a threshold for subthreshold depression: An analysis of correlates of depression by severity of symptoms using data from an elderly community sample. Gerontologist, 41, 357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.50 [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
Lewinsohn, P.M., Seeley, J.R., Roberts, R.E., & Allen, N.B. (1997). Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing older adults. Psychology and Aging, 12, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lomax, R.G. (1992). Statistical concepts: A second course for education and the behavioral sciences. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Lyness, J.M., Noel, T.K., Cox, C., King, D.A., Conwell, Y., & Caine, E.D. (1997). Screening for depression in elderly primary care patients. Archives of Internal Medicine, 157, 449–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W., & Sugawara, H.M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 2, 130–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Rourke, N., Haverkamp, B.E., Tuokko, H., Hayden, S., & Beattie, B.L. (1997). Hopelessness depression among spousal caregivers of suspected dementia patients. Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 3, 173–182.Google Scholar
Paterniti, S., Verdier-Taillefer, M.H., Dufouil, C., & Alperovitch, A. (2002). Depressive symptoms and cognitive decline in elderly people: Longitudinal study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 406–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radloff, L.S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radloff, L.S., & Teri, L. (1986). Use of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale with older adults. Clinical Gerontologist, 5, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, J., Vitaliano, P.P., Brewer, D.D., Katon, W., & Becker, J. (1995). Psychiatric disorders in spouse caregivers of care recipients with Alzheimer's disease and matched controls: A diathesis-stress model of psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 197–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scogin, F.R. (1994). Assessment of depression in older adults: A guide for practitioners. In Storandt, M. & VandenBos, G.R. (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment of dementia and depression in older adults: A clinician's guide (pp. 61–80). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stommel, M., Given, B.A., Given, C.W., Kalaian, H.A., Schulz, R., & McCorkle, R. (1993). Gender bias in the measurement properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Psychiatry Research, 49, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed