Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:04:54.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dyadic Adjustment Scale: A Validation Study among Older French-Canadians Living in Relationships*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2014

Laurence Villeneuve ,
Gilles Trudel ,
Michel Préville ,
Luc Dargis ,
Richard Boyer  and
Jean Bégin
Laurence Villeneuve*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal Mental Health Axis of Quebec Network for Research on Aging, Montréal
Gilles Trudel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal Mental Health Axis of Quebec Network for Research on Aging, Montréal Fernand Seguin Research Centre, Montreal
Michel Préville
Affiliation:
Mental Health Axis of Quebec Network for Research on Aging, Montréal Research Centre of Charles Lemoyne Hospital, Longueuil Department of Community Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil
Luc Dargis
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal Mental Health Axis of Quebec Network for Research on Aging, Montréal
Richard Boyer
Affiliation:
Mental Health Axis of Quebec Network for Research on Aging, Montréal Fernand Seguin Research Centre, Montreal Department of Psychiatry, Université de Montréal
Jean Bégin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal
*
†La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à : / Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to: Laurence Villeneuve, Ph.D. Candidate Department of Psychology Université du Québec à Montréal P.O. Box 8888 Downtown Station Montreal, QC H3C 3P8 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The principal objective of this study, the first of its kind to use this population, is to describe the factor analysis and validity of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (EAD) among 895 French Canadian seniors living as couples. A confirmatory factor analysis was carried out using structural equation modeling. Results support Spanier’s hierarchical model questionnaire (1976). Results also indicate evidence of validity and reliability satisfactorily set aside for the Affective Expression subscale having a lower Cronbach alpha coefficient. The results also indicate strong validity of the scale according to indices of convergent and discriminant validity. Finally, a discussion is presented addressing considerations to be taken into account for using the questionnaire among older couples.

Résumé

L’objectif principal de cette étude est de décrire la structure factorielle et la validité de l’Échelle d’Ajustement Dyadique (ÉAD) chez 895 aînés canadiens francophones vivant en couple. Il s’agit de la première étude du genre réalisée auprès de cette population. Une analyse factorielle confirmatoire a été réalisée à partir de la modélisation d’équation structurale. Les résultats supportent le modèle hiérarchique du questionnaire de Spanier (1976). Les résultats montrent également des indices de validité et de fidélité satisfaisants mise à part pour la sous-échelle Expression Affective qui présente un coefficient Alpha de Cronbach plus faible. Les résultats indiquent également une bonne validité de l’échelle à partir des indices de validité convergente et discriminante. Enfin, une discussion abordant les considérations à prendre en compte pour l’utilisation du questionnaire chez les couples âgés est formulée.

Keywords

agingconfirmatory factor analysisDyadic Adjustment Scaleolder couplesreliabilityvalidityvieillissementanalyse factorielle confirmatoirecouples âgésÉchelle d’Ajustement Dyadiquefidélitévalidité
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 26 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported by grants to Gilles Trudel as the principal researcher from the Canadian Institute of Health Research (MOP – 81281), Mental Health Axis of Quebec Network for Research on Aging (Fonds Québécois de Recherche en Santé), and by the Faculty of Human Sciences of Université du Québec à Montréal ([email protected]). Laurence Villeneuve received a doctoral fellowship from “Les Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec”.

References

Antill, J. K., & Cotton, S. (1982). Spanier's Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Some confirmatory analyses. Australian Psychologist, 17(2), 181–189. doi: 10.1080/00050068208255933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoine, P., Christophe, V., & Nandrino, J-L. (2008). Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Clinical interest of a revision and validation of an abbreviated form. L’Encéphale, 34, 38–46.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, J., Dubois, G., & Marineau, R. (1986). Traduction française de l’Échelle d’ajustement dyadique. [French translation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale.]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 18(1), 25–34. doi: 10.1037/h0079949.Google Scholar
Beach, S. R. H., Katz, J., Kim, S., & Brody, G. H. (2003). Prospective effects of marital satisfaction on depressive symptoms in established marriages: A dyadic model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 355–371.Google Scholar
Beach, S. R. H., & O’Leary, K. D. (1992). Treating depression in the context of marital discord:Outcome and predictors of response for marital therapy vs. cognitive therapy. Behavior Therapy, 23(4), 507–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bookwala, J. (2005). The role of marital quality in physical health during the mature years. Journal of Aging and Health, 17(1), 85–104. doi: 10.1177/0898264304272794.Google Scholar
Bookwala, J., & Franks, M. M. (2005). Moderating role of marital quality in older adults’ depressed affect: The main effects model. The Journal of gerontology: Series B: Psychological sciences and social sciences, 60B, 338–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bookwala, J., & Jacobs, J. (2004). Age, marital processes, and depressed affect. The Gerontologist, 44(3), 328–338. doi: 10.1093/geront/44.3.328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth, A., & Johnson, D. R. (1994). Declining health and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56(1), 218–223. doi: 10.2307/352716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 964–980. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x.Google Scholar
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cartensen, L. L., Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotional behavior in long-term marriage. Psychology and Aging, 10(1), 140–149.Google Scholar
Cartensen, L. L., Graff, J., Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. (1996). Affect in intimate relationships: The developmental course of marriage. In Magai, C. & McFadden, S. H. (Eds.), Handbook of emotion, adult development and aging (pp. 227–247). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. doi: 10.1007/bf02310555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dargis, L., Trudel, G., Cadieux, J., Villeneuve, L., Préville, M., & Boyer, R. (2012). Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and presentation of norms in older women. Sexologies, 21(3), 126–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddy, J. M., Heyman, R. E., & Weiss, R. L. (1991). An empirical evaluation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Exploring the differences between marital “satisfaction” and “adjustment”. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 199–220.Google Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, M. R., Trudel, G., Boyer, R., & Préville, M. (2007). Marital relationship and psychological distress: Its correlates and treatments. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 22(1), 109–126. doi: 10.1080/14681990600861040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfarb, M. R., Trudel, G., Boyer, R., & Préville, M. (2009). Marital adjustment and its association with gender and marital distress in old age. Paper presented at the 19th IAGG World Congress of Gerontology, Paris.Google Scholar
Graham, J. M., Liu, Y. J., & Jeziorski, J. L. (2006). The Dyadic Adjustment Scale: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(3), 701–717. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00284.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guay, S., & Miller, J-M., (2000). L’inventaire de soutien perçu (unpublished).Google Scholar
Hancock, G., R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In Cudeck, R., du Toit, S., & Sörbom, D. (Eds.), Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future (pp.195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
Hogan, P. T. (2003). Psychological testing. A practical introduction. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.Google Scholar
Ilfeld, F. W. (1976). Further validation of a psychiatric symptom index in a normal population. Psychological Reports, 39(3, Pt 2), 1215–1228. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1976.39.3f.1215 Google Scholar
Jarousse, N. (1995). Sexualité et vieillissement. Toulouse, France: Eres.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Lincolnwood, IN: Scientific Software, Inc.Google Scholar
Kazak, A. E., Jarmas, A., & Snitzer, L. (1988). The assessment of marital satisfaction: An evaluation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 2(1), 82–91. doi: 10.1037/h0080475.Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kurdek, L. A. (1992). Dimensionality of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Evidence from heterosexual and homosexual couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 6(1), 22–35. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.6.1.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levenson, R. W., Carstensen, L. L., & Gottman, J. M. (1993). Long-term marriage: Age, gender, and satisfaction. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 301–313. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage & Family Living, 21, 251–255. doi: 10.2307/348022.Google Scholar
Manne, S. L., Taylor, K. L., Dougherty, J., & Kemeny, N. (1997). Supportive and negative responses in the partner relationship: Their association with psychological adjustment among individuals with cancer. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20(2), 101–125. doi: 10.1023/a:1025574626454.Google Scholar
Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430–445.Google Scholar
Norris, M. P., Snyder, D. K., & Rice, J. L. (1997). Marital satisfaction in older adults: A comparison of community and clinic couples. Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 3(2), 111–122.Google Scholar
Préville, M., Boyer, R., Potvin, L., Perrault, C., & Légaré, G. (1992). La détresse psychologique : détermination de la fiabilité et de la validité de la mesure utilisée dans l’enquête Santé Québec [Psychological distress: determining the reliability and validity of the measure used in the Quebec Health Survey]. Quebec: Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux, Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
Roach, A. J., Frazier, L. P., & Bowden, S. R. (1981). The Marital Satisfaction Scale: Development of a measure for intervention research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43(3), 537–546. doi: 10.2307/351755.Google Scholar
Sabourin, S., Lussier, Y., Laplante, B., & Wright, J. (1990). Unidimensional and multidimensional models of dyadic adjustment: A hierarchical reconciliation. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2(3), 333–337. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.2.3.333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabourin, S., Valois, P., & Lussier, Y. (2005). Development and validation of a brief version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale with a nonparametric item analysis model. Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 15–27.Google Scholar
Sharpley, C. F., & Cross, D. G. (1982). A psychometric evaluation of the Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44(3), 739–741. doi: 10.2307/351594.Google Scholar
South, S. C., Krueger, R. F., & Iacono, W. G. (2009). Factorial invariance of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale across gender. Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 622–628. doi: 10.1037/a0017572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15–28. doi: 10.2307/350547.Google Scholar
Spanier, G. B. (1989). Manual for the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi Health Systems, Inc.Google Scholar
Spanier, G. B., & Thompson, L. (1982). A confirmatory analysis of the dyadic adjustment scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44(3), 731–738. doi: 10.2307/351593.Google Scholar
St-Jean-Trudel, E., Guay, S., & Bonaventure, M. (2003). Social support and anxiety disorders: A pilot study. Communication presented at the 37th AABCT Annual Convention, Boston.Google Scholar
Story, T. N., Berg, C. A., Smith, T. W., Beveridge, R., Henry, N. J. M., & Pearce, G. (2007). Age, marital satisfaction, and optimism as predictors of positive override in middle-aged and older married couples. Psychology and Aging, 22(4), 719–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’a alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tower, R. B., & Kasl, S. V. (1995). Depressive symptoms across older spouses and the moderating effect of marital closeness. Psychology and Aging, 10(4), 625–638. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.10.4.625.Google Scholar
Trudel, G. (2002). Sexuality and marital life: Results of a survey. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 28(3), 229–249. doi: 10.1080/009262302760328271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trudel, G., Turgeon, L., & Piché, L. (2000). Marital and sexual aspects of old age. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 15(4), 381–406. doi: 10.1080/713697433.Google Scholar
Trudel, G., Villeneuve, L., Préville, M., Boyer, R., & Fréchette, V. (2010). Dyadic adjustment, sexuality and psychological distress in older couples. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25(3), 306–315. doi: 10.1080/14681991003702583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaillant, C. O., & Vaillant, G. E. (1993). Is the U-curve of marital satisfaction an illusion: A 40 year study of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(1), 230–239. doi: 10.2307/352971.Google Scholar
Van Laningham, J., Johnson, D. R., & Amato, P. R. (2001). Marital happiness, marital duration, and the U-shaped curve: Evidence from a five-wave panel study. Social Forces, 79(4), 1313–1341. doi: 10.1353/sof.2001.0055.Google Scholar
Vandeleur, C. L., Fenton, B. T., Ferrero, F., & Preisig, M. (2003). Construct validity of the French version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62(3), 167–175. doi: 10.1024//1421-0185.62.3.167.Google Scholar
Whisman, M. A., & Uebelacker, L. A. (2009). Prospective associations between marital discord and depressive symptoms in middle-aged and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 24(1), 184 –189. doi: 10.1037/a0014759.Google Scholar
Yorgason, J. B., Booth, A., & Johnson, D. (2008). Health, disability, and marital quality: Is the association different for younger versus older cohorts? Research on Aging, 30(6), 623–648. doi: 10.1177/0164027508322570.Google Scholar