Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:09:49.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive Versus Social Rigidity in Old Age: Implications for Therapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Doris Christoph  and
Anita K.F. Li
Doris Christoph
Affiliation:
Holy Cross Hospital, Calgary
Anita K.F. Li
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study examined the interrelationships among cognitive and social rigidity, intelligence and personal adjustment in old age, and evaluated a six-week training program teaching social problem-solving skills to the elderly. Ninety-eight subjects, aged 60.9 to 88.0 years, were randomly assigned to the treatment, placebo control, and the waiting-list groups. Subjects were pretested on the TBR Opposites test (cognitive rigidity), the social MEPS (social rigidity), WAIS Vocabulary, and Adjustment of Old Age scales; and post-tested on social rigidity and adjustment The hypothesis that cognitive rigidity is independent of social rigidity was not fully supported. Adjustment to old age was found to be significantly related to social rigidity and, to a lesser degree, to cognitive rigidity. Only treatment subjects showed an overall, significant pre- to post-training improvement on social MEPS scores. The findings suggest that social rigidity is amenable to change.

Résumé

La présente étude porte sur les rapports entre la rigidité cognitive et sociale, l'intelligence et l'adaptation personnelle au cours de la vieillesse, ainsi que sur l'évaluation d'un programme de formation d'une durée de six semaines conçu en vue d'enseìgner aux personnes àgées à résoudre les problèmes d'ordre social. Quatre-vingt-dix-huit sujets, âgés de 60,9 à 88,0 ans, ont été répartis en trois groupes, soit groupe de traitement, groupe témoin et liste d'attente. Les pré-tests suivants ont été administrés: TBR Opposites Test (rigidité cognitive), MEPS social (rigidité sociale), WAIS Vocabulary (test de vocabulaire), et Adjustment of Old Age (échelles d'adaptation à la vieillesse); les post-tests comprenaient la mesure de rigidité sociale et l'adaptation. L'hypothèse selon laquelle la rigidité cognitive est indépendante de la rigidité sociale n'a pas été entièrement appuyée. L'adaptation à la vieillesse s'est avérée reliée de façon significative à la rigidité sociale et, à un moindre degré, à la rigidité cognitive. Seuls les sujets compris dans le groupe de traitement font preuve d'amélioration au test MEPS. Les résultats permettent de croire que la rigidité sociale est susceptible de modification.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 59 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baltes, P. B. (1973). Prototypical paradigms and questions in life-span research on development and aging. The Gerontologist, 13, 458–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birren, J. E., & Morrison, D. F. (1961). Analysis of the WAIS subtests in relation to age and education. Journal of Gerontology, 16, 363–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgess, E. W., Cavan, R.S., & Havighurst, R. J. (1953). Your activities and attitudes. In Havighurst, R. J. & Albrecht, R., Older People. New York: Longmans.Google Scholar
Chown, S. M. (1960). A factor analysis of the Wesley Rigidity Inventory. Its relationship to age and nonverbal intelligence. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 491–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chown, S. M. (1961). Age and therigidities. Journal of Gerontology, 16, 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denney, D. R., & Denney, N. W. (1973). The use of classification for problem solving: A comparison ofmiddle and old age. Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 275–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, K. (1977). Structured group exercises: Group therapy. Calgary: Holy Cross Hospital.Google Scholar
Mangan, G. L., & Clark, J. W. (1958). Rigidity factors in the testing of middle-aged subjects. Journal of Gerontology, 13, 422–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neugarten, B.L., Havighurst, R. J., & Tovin, S. S. (1961). The measurement of life satisfaction. Journal of Gerontology, 16, 134–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Platt, J. J., & Spivack, G. (1975). Manual for the Means-Ends Problem-Solving Procedure. Philadelphia: Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital.Google Scholar
Platt, J. J., Spivack, G., & Swift, M.S. (1974). Interpersonal problem-solving group therapy. Report No. 31. Philadelphia: Hahnemann Medical College and HospitalGoogle Scholar
Riegel, K. F., & Riegel, R. M. (1960). A study on changes in attitude and interests during later years of life. Vita Humana, 3, 177–206.Google Scholar
Schaie, K. W. (1955). A test of behavioral rigidity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 604–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaie, K. W. (1958). Rigidity-flexibility and intelligence: A cross-sectional study of the adult life span from 20 to 70 years. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 72 (9, Whole No. 462).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaie, K. W. (1959). The effect of age on a scale of Social Responsibility. The Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivack, G., Platt, J. J., & Shure, M. B. (1976). The problem-solving approach to adjustment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Spivack, G., Standen, C. H., Bryson, J., & Garrett, L. (1978). Interpersonal problem-solving thinking in an elderly group: A pilot study. Unpublished manuscript, Hahnemann Community Health/Mental Retardation Center, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Young, M. L. (1966). Problem-solving performance in two age groups. Journal of Gerontology, 21, 505–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed