Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:50:43.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ageism, Sex, and Age: A Factorial Survey Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Paul M. Baker
Paul M. Baker
Affiliation:
University of Victoria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the field of social gerontology, some evidence exists to support Cowgill's theory that modernization leads to a decline in the status of the old. However, all of the evidence to date consists of objective indices of status such as education or income. The study reported here uses the factorial survey approach to directly measure the perceived status of various ages, and of both males and females. The results indicate that there is in fact an inverted U-curve of status across the life span, and that the perceived status of females is lower than that of males in the midlife period.

There were a few minor variations in the status ratings due to sex, age, and the type of question asked. Females rated middle aged males slightly higher in status that did males, and older respondents rated the very young and the very old higher than did younger respondents. The most significant factor affecting the status ratings was age, but since the oldest respondent was only 35, this study must be replicated with older samples.

Résumé

Dans le domaine de la gérontologie sociale, certaines indications tendent à confirmer la thèse de Cogwill à l'effet que la modernisation entraîne un abaissement du rang social des vieillards. Toutes ces indications reposent cependant sur des indices objectifs tels que le degré d'instruction et le revenu personnel. La présente étude aborde la question à partir d'une enquête factorielle destinée à mesurer directement la perception du rang social chez les groupes d'âges divers ainsi que chez les hommes et les femmes. Les résultats indiquent que le reng social au cours de la vie suit en effet une courbe en U invertie, et que le rang social attribué aux femmes est inférieur à celui des hommes au cours de l'âge mûr.

On voit cependant apparaître de légères variations liées au sexe, à l'âge et au genre de questions possées. Les femmes attribuent aux hommes mûrs un rang légèrement plus élevé que ne le font les hommes eux-mêmes, et les répondants âgés attribuent aux très jeunes et aux grands vieillards un rang plus élevé que ne le font les répondants jeunes. L'âge constitue le facteur de variation le plus significatif mais, étant donné que le répondant le plus vieux n'avait que 35 ans, il convient de refaire l'enquête en interrogeant des répondants plus âgés.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 1983 , pp. 177 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, P.M.On the use of psychophysical methods in the study of social status. Social Forces, 1977, 55, 898–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P.M.Occupational prestige and accorded status: the problem of dissensus. Western Sociological Review, 1980a, 11, 24–32.Google Scholar
Baker, P.M.Consensus and dissensus in the attribution of status and equity. American Journal of Sociology, 1980b, 86, 641–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowgill, D.O. Aging and modernization: a revision of the theory. In Gubrium, J. (Ed.), Later life: Communities and environmental policy. Springfield, Illinois: Thomas, 1972.Google Scholar
Cowgill, D.O. & Holmes, L.Aging and Modernization. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.Google Scholar
Cutler, S.J.An approach to the measurement of prestige loss among the aged. Aging and Human Development, 1972, 3, 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowd, J.J.Aging as exchange: preface to theory. Journal of Gerontology, 1975, 30, 584–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, S.K.Attitudes and perceptions about the elderly: current and future perspectives. Aging and Human Development, 1981, 13, 99–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McTavish, D.G.Perceptions of old people: a review of research, methodologies, and findings. The Gerontologist, 1971, 11, 90–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myles, J. The aged, the state, and the structure of inequality. In Harp, J. & Hofley, J. (Eds.), Structural inequality in Canada. Toronto: Prentice-Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
Neugarten, B., Moore, J.W. & Lowe, J.C.Age norms, age constraints, and adult socialization. American Journal of Sociology, 1965, 70, 710–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmore, E.The honorable elders. Durham N.C.: Duke University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Palmore, E. & Manton, K.Modernization and the status of the aged: international correlations. Journal of Gerontology, 1974, 29, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, P. & Nock, S.Measuring social judgments: the factorial survey approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1982.Google Scholar
Stevens, S.S.Psychophysics: introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
Williamson, J.B., Munley, A. & Evans, L.Aging and society: an introduction to social gerontology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1980.Google Scholar