Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:32:10.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age Differences in Extrapersonal Orientation as Measured by Performance on the Locomotor Maze

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Jocelyn B. Aubrey  and
Allen R. Dobbs
Jocelyn B. Aubrey
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Allen R. Dobbs
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sixteen healthy community residing elderly adults and 16 university students completed the Locomotor Maze test of extrapersonal orientation. They were given maps with nine location dots in a 3 × 3 matrix that corresponded to nine red discs on the floor of the experimental room. Participants were asked to walk the path outlined on each map without turning the map. Six maps were presented with paths increasing one segment in length with each subsequent map. The older adults committed more errors on the longer maps and took more time to make direction choices than young people. Because participants were free to consult the map throughout each trial, reliance on memory for landmaks and routes that characterizes earlier research was eliminated. It is suggested that the decreased performance shown by elderly adults on this task may be due to difficulty with working memory and mental rotation or increased field dependence.

Résumé

Seize adultes plus vieux, en bonne santé, et vivant dans la communauté et seize étudiants universitaires ont complété un test d'orientation dans un labyrinthe: le ‘Locomotor Maze’. Les participants ont reçu des cartes marquées de neuf points de repère représentant neuf disques rouges disposés sur le plancher du laboratoire. La carte, comme le plancher, était carrée. Les participants devaient suivre le parcours inscrit sur chaque carte mais sans la faire pivoter. Chaque participant a reçu une série de six cartes portant des trajets de longueurs différentes. La première carte portait le trajet le plus court et chaque carte subséquente comprenait un segment de plus. Les participants plus vieux ont commis plus d'erreurs sur les parcours les plus longs et ils ont mis davantage de temps à choisir les directions à suivre que les jeunes. Contrairement aux recherches précédentes, les participants pouvaient consulter la carte au cours de l'épreuve éliminant ainsi une dépendance sur la mémoire des points de repère et des trajets. Les auteurs suggèrent que les résultats obtenus par les participants plus vieux peuvent être dus aux difficultés de la mémoire de travail et de rotation mentale ou à une plus grande dépendence de champ (field dependence).

Keywords

elderlyspatial orientationroute finding
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , Winter/hiver 1989 , pp. 333 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. London: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A.D. & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G.H. (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation, Vol. VIII (pp. 47–90). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Berg, C., Hertzog, C., & Hunt, E. (1982). Age differences in the speed of mental rotation. Developmental Psychology, 18, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerella, J., Poon, L.W., & Fozard, J.L. (1981). Mental Rotation and age reconsidered. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 620–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaylord, S.A., & Marsh, G.R. (1975). Age differences in the speed of a spatial cognitive process. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 674–678.Google ScholarPubMed
Karp, S.A. (1963). Field dependence and overcoming embeddedness. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 27, 294–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kausler, D.H. (1982). Experimental psychology and human aging. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kirasic, K.C. & Allen, G.L. (1985). Aging, spatial performance and spatial competence. In Charness, N. (Ed.), Aging and human performance, (pp. 191–223). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lee, J.A. & Pollock, R.H. (1980). The effects of age on perceptual field dependence. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 239–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, L.L., & Zelinski, E.M. (1983). Memory for spatial information in young and old adults. Developmental Psychology, 19, 901–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T.E., Richards, B., & Hood, J. (1984). Aging and the coding of spatial information. Journal of Gerontology, 39, 210–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, R.G., Gick, M.L., & Craik, F.I.M. (1988). Processing resources and age differences in working memory. Memory & Cognition, 16, 362–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohta, R.J. (1983). Spatial orientation in the elderly: The current status of understanding. In Pick, H.L. Jr, & Acredolo, L.P. (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application, (pp. 105–124). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, R.J., Walsh, D.A., & Krauss, I.K. (1981). Spatial perspective-taking ability in young and elderly adults. Experimental Aging Research, 7, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panek, P. E. (1985). Age differences in field-dependence/independence. Experimental Aging Research, 11, 97–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, D.C., Puglisi, J.T., & Lutz, R. (1982). Spatial memory in older adults: Effects of intentionality. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 330–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratcliff, G., & Newcombe, F. (1973). Spatial orientation in man: Effects of left, right, and bilateral posterior cerebral lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 36, 448–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reisberg, B. (Ed.) (1983). Alzheimer's disease: The standard reference. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Rule, B.G. & Dobbs, A.R. (1987). Working memory in older adults. Canadian Psychology, 28(2a), Abstract No. 526.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T.A. (1982). Adult cognition: An experimental psychology of human aging. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semmes, J., Weinstein, S., Ghent, L., & Teuber, H-L. (1955). Spatial orientation in man after cerebral injury: I. Analysis by locus of lesion. Journal of Psychology, 39, 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semmes, J., Weinstein, S., Ghent, L., & Teuber, H-L. (1963). Correlates of impaired orientation in personal and extrapersonal space. Brain, 86, 747–772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, D.A., Krauss, I.K., & Regnier, V.A. (1981).a Spatial ability, environmentaln knowledge, and environmental use: The elderly. In Liben, L., Patterson, A., & Newcombe, N. (Eds.), Spatial representation and behavior across the life span, (pp. 321–357). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Weber, R.J., Brown, L.T., & Weldon, J.K. (1978). Cognitive maps of environmental knowledge and preference in nursing home patients. Experimental Aging Research, 4, 157–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinstein, S., Semmes, J., Ghent, L., & Teuber, H-L. (1956). Spatial orientation in man after cerebral injury: II. Analysis according to concommitant defects. Journal of Psychology, 42, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, R. E. (1981). Aging, divided attention, and processing capacity. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 605–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed