Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:34:45.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social Support in Older Age: Assessing the Impact of Marital and Parent Status*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Ingrid Arnet Connidis
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Julie A. McMullin
Affiliation:
University of Toronto

Abstract

In this study we examine the impact of parent status and marital status on (1) the foundations of social support networks and (2) who one turns to if help is required with activities of daily living. Data are taken from structured interviews with 678 community-dwelling persons aged 55 and over in London, Canada. This sample overrepresents the childless, single (never married), and divorced, thus ensuring adequate numbers in each category for data analysis. Our findings indicate that marital status is more influential than parent status regarding differences in the foundations of social support. However, for more specific forms of assistance, the divorced and single are more likely than the married, and the childless are more likely than parents to rely on formal support and paid help and less likely to rely on family. As well, for both marital and parent status, there are significant interactions with gender.

Résumé

Dans le cadre de cette étude, nous examinons les répercussions de la situation de parent et de l'état matrimonial sur (1) les fondations des réseaux de soutien sociaux et (2) l'identité des personnes auxquelles on fait appel afin d'obtenir de l'aide pour accomplir ses activités quotidiennes. Les données proviennent d'entrevues structurées menées auprès de 678 personnes de 55 ans et plus vivant à leur domicile à London, en Ontario. Aux fins de l'analyse, cet échantillon compte une surreprésentation des personnes sans enfant, des célibataires (personnes jamais mariées) et des personnes divorcées afin d'assurer un nombre adéquat dans chaque catégorie. Nos résultats ont démontré que l'état matrimonial a une plus grande influence que la situation de parent en ce qui touche les différences dans les fondations du réseau de soutien social. Toutefois, dans le cas des formes d'assistance plus spécialisées, les personnes divorcées et les célibataires sont plus susceptibles que les personnes mariées, et les personnes sans enfant que les parents, de faire appel aux services de soutien formels et aux services d'aide professionnels, et moins portés à se reposer sur la famille. De plus, tant dans le cas de l'état matrimonial que dans la situation de parent, les résultats démontrent une importante interaction entre les sexes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Baine B., Rubinstein, Robert L., Goodman, Marcene, & Luborsky, Mark. (1992). A Path Not Taken: A Cultural Analysis of Regrets and Childlessness in the Lives of Older Women. The Gerontologist, 32, 618626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allan, Graham. (1986). Friendship and Care for Elderly People. Ageing and Society, 6(1), 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, Christine A. (1980). Childlessness and Social Isolation Among the Elderly. Journal of Marriage and the Family, Aug., 627637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, Jessie. (1972). The Future of Marriage. New York: World Publications.Google Scholar
Braito, Rita, & Anderson, Donna. (1983). The Ever-Single Elderly Women. In Markson, E.W. (Ed.), Older Women (pp. 195225). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Brody, Elaine M. (1985). Parent Care as a Normative Family Stress. The Gerontologist, 25, 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulcroft, Kris A., & Bulcroft, Richard A. (1991). The Timing of Divorce: Effects on Parent-Child Relationships in Later Life. Research on Aging, 13, 226243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, Marjorie H. (1979). Neighbours and Friends: An Overlooked Resource in the Informal Support System. Research on Aging, 1, 434463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Nancy J. (1989). Gender, Marital Status and Childlessness of Older Persons and the Availability of Informal Assistance. In Petersen, M.D. & White, D.L. (Eds.), Health Care of the Elderly: An Information Source-book (pp. 277328). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Chappell, Neena L. (1981). Measuring Functional Ability and Chronic Health Conditions among the Elderly: A Research Note on the Adequacy of Three Instruments. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 90102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chappell, Neena L., & Badger, Mark. (1989). Social Isolation and Well-being. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 44, S169–S176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicirelli, Victor, Coward, Raymond T., & Dwyer, Jeffrey W. (1992). Siblings as Caregivers for Impaired Elders. Research on Aging, 14, 331350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connidis, Ingrid Arnet. (1989a). Family Ties and Aging. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Connidis, Ingrid. (1989b). Siblings as Friends in Later Life. American Behavioral Scientist, 33(1), 8193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connidis, Ingrid. (1989c). Contact Between Siblings in Later Life. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 14(4), 429442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connidis, Ingrid, & Davies, Lorraine. (1990). Confidants and Companions in Later Life: The Place of Family and Friends. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 45(4), S141149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connidis, Ingrid Arnet, & McMullin, Julie Ann. (1992). Getting out of the House: The Effect of Childlessness on Social Participation and Companionship in Later Life. Canadian Journal on Aging, 11(4), 370386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daatland, Svein Olav. (1990). What are Families For? On Family Solidarity and Preference for Help. Ageing and Society, 10, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, Alice T. (1987). Family Support of the Elderly: Survey Design and Policy Implications. Paper presented to the European Population Conference, Jyraskyla, Finland, June.Google Scholar
Forbes, William F., Jackson, Jennifer A., & Kraus, Arthur S. (1987). Institutionali-zation of the Elderly in Canada. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Gibson, Diane, & Mugford, Stephen. (1986). Expressive Relations and Social Support. In Kendig, Hal L. (Ed.), Ageing and Families: A Social Networks Perspective (pp. 6384). Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Gold, Deborah T., Woodbury, Max A., & George, Linda K. (1990). Relationship Classification Using Grade of Membership Analysis: A Typology of Sibling Relationships in Later Life. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 45, S43–S51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Health and Welfare Canada. (1982). Canadian Governmental Report on Aging. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services.Google Scholar
Hennon, Charles. (1983). Divorce and the Elderly: A Neglected Area of Research. In Brubaker, Timothy H. (Ed.), Family Relationships in Later Life (pp. 149172). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Johnson, Colleen Leahy & Catalano, Donald J. (1981). Childless Elderly and Their Family Supports. The Gerontologist, 21(6), 610618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keith, Pat.M. (1983). Patterns of Assistance Among Parents and the Childless in Very Old Age: Implications for Practice. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 6(1), 4959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, Pat.M. (1986). Isolation of the Elderly in Later Life. Family Relations, 35(3), 389395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendig, Hal L., Coles, Rita, Pittelkow, Yvonne, & Wilson, Sue. (1988). Confidants and Family Structure in Old Age. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 43, S32–S40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitson, Gay C., Lopata, H.Z., Holmes, W.M., & Meyering, S.M. (1980). Divorcees and Widows: Similarities and Differences. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 50, 291301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, Gary R. & Ihinger-Tallman, Marilyn. (1980). Sibling Interaction and Morale: The Effects of Family Relations on Older People. Research on Aging, 2(3), 367391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litwak, Eugene. (1985). Helping the Elderly: The Complementary Roles of Informal Networks and Formal Systems. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Charles F. Jr, & Lipman, Aaron. (1981). Married and Spouseless Men and Women in Planned Retirement Communities: Support Network Differentials. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 169177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin Matthews, Anne. (1987). Widowhood as an Expectable Life Event. In Marshall, Victor W. (Ed.), Aging in Canada: Social Perspectives (2nd ed.) (pp. 343366). Toronto: Fitzhenry and Whiteside.Google Scholar
Martin Matthews, Anne. (1991). Widowhood in Later Life. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Martin Matthews, Anne, with Shipsides, Ardith. (1989). Contributors to the Loss of Independence and the Promotion of Independence among Seniors. Report prepared for the Seniors Independence Research Program Community Health Division Health and Welfare Canada.Google Scholar
Minister for Senior Citizens Affairs, Ontario. Seniors Secretariat. (1985a). Elderly Residents in Ontario: Differences by Marital Status with a Particular Focus on those who are Single. Toronto, September.Google Scholar
Minister for Senior Citizens Affairs, Ontario. Seniors Secretariat. (1985b). Elderly Residents in Ontario: The Experiences of those who are Childless. Toronto, September.Google Scholar
Morgan, David L. (1988). Age differences in Social Network Participation. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 43, S129–S137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mugford, Stephen, & Kendig, Hal L. (1986). Social Relations: Networks and Ties. In Kendig, Hal L. (Ed.), Ageing and Families: A Social Networks Perspective (pp. 3859). Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
National Advisory Council on Aging (NACA). (1989). Understanding Seniors' Independence, Report no. 1: The barriers and suggestions for action. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services.Google Scholar
Nett, Emily. (1984). The Family and Aging. In Baker, Maureen (Ed.), The Family: Changing Trends in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited.Google Scholar
Rempel, Judith. (1985). Childless Elderly: What are they Missing? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 941955.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Robert L. (1987). The Never Married Elderly as a Social Type: Re-evaluating Some Images. The Gerontologist, 27(1), 108113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, Jean Pearson. (1990). Siblings and Other Kin. In Brubaker, Timothy H. (Ed.), Family Relationships in Later Life. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Simons, Ronald L. (19831984). Specificity and Substitution in the Social Networks of the Elderly. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 18, 121139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistics Canada. (1986). Sex, Age groups, and 1985 Income Groups. Ottawa: Minister of Supplies and Services.Google Scholar
Stolar, G. Elaine, Hill, Mary A., & Tomblin, Alanna. (1986). Family Disengagement — Myth or Reality: A Follow-up Study After Geriatric Assessment. Canadian Journal on Aging, 5(2), 113124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Robyn, Cafferata, Gail Lee, & Sangl, Judith. (1987). Caregivers of the Frail Elderly: A National Profile. The Gerontologist, 27, 616626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strain, Laurel, & Chappell, Neena. (1982). Confidants — Do They Make a Difference in Quality of Life? Research on Aging, 4, 479502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincente, Leticia, Wiley, James, & Carrington, Allen. (1979). The Risk of Institutionalization Before Death. The Gerontologist, 19(4), 361367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Russell A. (1979). The Never-Married in Later Life. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 861869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, Russell A., La Gory, Mark, & Sherman, Susan R. (1985). Social Ties of the Elderly. Sociology and Social Research, 70, 102106.Google Scholar
Ward, Russell A., La Gory, Mark, & Sherman, Susan R. (1988). The Environment for Aging. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Wister, Andrew V., Strain, Laurel. (1986). Social Support and Well-being: A Comparison of Older Widows and Widowers. Canadian Journal on Aging, 5(3), 205220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar