Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:21:38.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychometric Properties of the French Version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (form Y) Adapted for Older Adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Stéphane Bouchard ,
Hans Ivers ,
Janel G. Gauthier ,
Marie-Hélène Pelletier  and
Josée Savard
Stéphane Bouchard
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Hull, Centre de Recherche Université Laval Robert-Giffard, Centre Hospitalier Pierre-Janet
Hans Ivers
Affiliation:
Université Laval
Janel G. Gauthier
Affiliation:
Université Laval
Marie-Hélène Pelletier
Affiliation:
Université Laval
Josée Savard
Affiliation:
Université Laval
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although there are reports that the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) should be adapted to older adults, the standard version of the instrument is consistently used with this population. Bouchard, Gauthier, Ivers and Paradis (1996) have adapted a French version of the STAI for a population of older adults and found one item with extremely low item-remainder correlation. In Study 1 (N = 57), alternative formulations of item 24 were assessed to examine if the low item-remainder correlation was related to problems in translation that could become apparent in a sample of older adults. Study 2 (N= 188) was conducted in order to replicate the findings of Study 1 and assess the factor structure of the instrument. In Study 3, 46 older adults completed the instrument on two occasions with a 35-day interval to assess test-retest reliability. Our results suggest that: (a) item 24 should be removed from the trait anxiety scale and be replaced by the mean of the other anxiety-present items; (b) the instrument has a four-factor structure similar to what is found with the standard version of the STAI in nonelderly samples; and (c) both subscales are highly stable.

Résumé

Bien que certaines études indiquent qu'il soit nécessaire d'adapter l'Inventaire d'Anxiété Situationelle et de Trait d'Anxiété (IASTA) pour une utilisation auprès des personnes âgées, la version standard de l'IASTA est couramment utilisée. Lorsque Bouchard, Gauthier, Ivers et Paradis (1996) ont adapté l'IASTA pour les personnes âgées ils ont observé qu'un item posait des problèmes importants de consistance interne. Dans l'Étude 1 (N= 57), ils ont examiné si des formulations alternatives de l'item 24 pouvaient améliorer les indices de consistance interne (item-remainder correlation), suggérant ainsi la présence de problèmes de traduction devenant apparent auprès d'un échantillon de sujets âgés. L'Etude 2 (N = 188) visait à reproduire les résultats de l'Étude 1 et déterminer la structure factorielle de l'instrument. Pour l'Étude 3, 46 personnes âgées ont complété l'instrument à deux reprises dans un intervalle de 35 jours afin d'évaluer la corrélation test-retest. Les résultats suggèrent que: (a) l'item 24 doit être éliminé de l'échelle de trait d'anxiété et remplacé par la moyenne des items reflétant la présence d'anxiété; (b) l'IASTA-Y65+ est constitué de quatre facteurs similaires à ceux de l'IASTA-Y; et (c) la stabilité test-retest des deux sous-échelles est très élevée.

Keywords

ElderlyAnxiety MeasurementState-Trait Anxiety InventoryPsychometryPersonnes âgéesanxiétéévaluation de l'anxiétéinventaire d'anxiété situ-ationelle et de trait d'anxiétépsychometrie
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , Hiver/Winter 1998 , pp. 440 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Arrindell, W.A., & van der Ende, J. (1985). An empirical test of the utility of the observations-to-variables ratio in factor and components analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(2), 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, I.H., & Eveland, D.C. (1982). State vs trait anxiety: A case study in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, S. (1990). Traduction, fidélité et validité d'un inventaire d'anxiété situ-ationnelle et de trait d'anxiété [Translation, reliability and validity of a state-trait anxiety inventory]. Unpublished master's thesis, Laval University, Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
Bouchard, S., Gauthier, J., Ivers, H., & Paradis, J. (1996). Adaptation de l'Inventaire d'Anxiété Situationnelle et de Trait d'Anxiété aux personnes âgées de 65 ans et plus (IASTA–Y65+) [Adaptation of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory to the elderly (65 years old and over)]. Canadian Journal on Aging, 15(4), 500–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R.B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cliff, N., & Hamburger, C.D. (1967). The study of sampling errors in factor analysis by means of artificial experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 68(6), 430–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, T.H. (1979). Psychometric assessment in the elderly. In Raskin, A. & Jarvik, L.F. (Eds.), Psychiatric symptoms and cognitive loss in the elderly: Evaluation and assessment techniques (pp. 207–220). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Ferguson, G.E. (1954). The concept of parsimony in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19(A), 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, J.G., & Bouchard, S. (1993). Adaptation canadienne-française de la forme revisée du State-Trait Anxiety Inventory de Spielberger [French-canadian adaptation of the revised form of the Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory]. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25(4), 559–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersen, M., & Van Hasselt, V.B. (1992). Behavioral assessment and treatment of anxiety in the elderly. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 619–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersen, M., Van Hasselt, V.B., & Goreczny, A.J. (1993). Behavioral assessment of anxiety in older adults: some comments. Behavior Modification, 17(2), 99–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Himmelfarb, S., & Murrell, S.A. (1983). Reliability and validity of five mental health scales in older persons. Journal of Gerontology, 38(3), 333–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussian, R.A. (1981). Special considerations in assessment. In Hussian, R.A. (Ed.), Geriatric psychology: A behavioral perspective (pp. 109–122). New-York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.Google Scholar
Ivers, H., Gauthier, J.G., & Bouchard, S. (in preparation). The use of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in the elderly: clinical and psychometric considerations.Google Scholar
Kabacoff, R.I., Segal, D.L., Hersen, M., & Van Hasselt, V.B. (1997). Psychometric properties and diagnostic utility of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory with older adult psychatric outpatients. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H.F. (1970). A second generation little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H.F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, R.G., Waal-Manning, H.J., & Spears, G.F. (1983). Some norms and reliability data for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Zung Self-Rating Depression scale. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22, 245–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaRue, A., & D'Élia, L.F. (1985). Anxiety and problem solving in middle-aged and elderly adults. Experimental Aging Research, 11, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, R.J., & Spielberger, C.D. (1983). Measuring anxiety in hospitalized geriatric patients. In Spielberger, C.D. & Diaz-Guerrero, R. (Eds), Cross-cultural anxiety (vol. 2) (pp. 135–143). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Patterson, R.L., O'Sullivan, M.J., & Spielberger, C.D. (1980). Measurement of state and trait anxiety in elderly mental health clients. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 2(2), 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennell, R. (1968). The influence of communality and N on the sampling distributions of factor loadings. Psychometrika, 53(4), 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, E.J., Gfeller, J.D., & Gilner, F.H. (1993). Measuring anxiety states in the elderly using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for children. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 27(1), 111–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute. (1990). SAS STAT: User's guide version 6.01 (4th ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Sheikh, J.L. (1991). Anxiety rating scales for the elderly. In Salzman, C. & Lebowitz, B.D. (Eds.), Anxiety in the elderly: Treatment and research (pp. 251–265). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C.D. (1972). Anxiety as an emotional state. In Spielberger, C.D. (Ed.), Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (vol. 1) (pp. 23–49). New York, NY: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spielberger, C.D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L., & Lushene, R.E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (self-evaluation questionnaire). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C.D., Vagg, P.R., Barker, L.R., Donham, G.W., & Westburry, L.G. (1980). The factor structure of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. In Sarason, I.G. & Spielberger, C.D. (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (vol. 7) (pp. 95–109). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Stanley, M.A., Beck, J.G., & Zebb, B.J. (1996). Psychometric properties of four anxiety measures in older adults. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 827–838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New-York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
Tanaka-Matsumi, J., & Kameoka, V.A. (1986). Reliabilities and concurrent validities of popular self-report measures of depression, anxiety, and social desirability. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(3), 328–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thurstone, L.L. (1947). Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vagg, P.R., Spielberger, C.D., & O'Hearn, T.P. (1980). Is the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory multidimensional? Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarit, S.H., Eiler, J., & Hassinger, M. (1985). Clinical assessment. In Birren, J.E. & Schaie, K.W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (2nd ed.) (pp. 725–754). New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.Google Scholar