Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:05:35.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indicators of Home Care Use in Urban and Rural Settings*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

Lori A. Mitchell*
Affiliation:
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba
Laurel A. Strain
Affiliation:
Alberta Centre on Aging, University of Alberta, Edmonton
Audrey A. Blandford
Affiliation:
Centre on Aging University of Manitoba
*
Requests for offprints should be sent to:/Les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à: Lori A. Mitchell, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2. ([email protected])

Abstract

This study employs a longitudinal design to examine rural–urban differences in home care service use over time, drawing on data from the Manitoba Study of Health and Aging (MSHA). Characteristics of community-dwelling, cognitively intact adults aged 65 years or older not receiving home care services in the province of Manitoba (n = 855) were collected in 1991/1992. Place of residence was categorized as urban/small-town zone or predominantly rural area. A 5-year follow-up determined subsequent home care use. Urban residents were more likely to receive home care than those in small-town zones or predominantly rural areas. Characteristics associated with use differed according to place of residence, with the exception of baseline physical functioning and changes in physical functioning that consistently emerged as significant. Directions for future research are discussed.

Résumé

Cette étude emploie un modèle longitudinal pour l'examen des différences rurales-urbaines en matière d'utilisation de services de soins à domicile au fil du temps, et s'inspire des données de l'Étude sur la santé et le vieillissement au Manitoba (ESVM). Des paramètres ont été recueillis en 1991–92 sur des adultes de 65 ans et plus, vivant dans la communauté et ne souffrant d'aucun trouble cognitif, qui ne reçoivent pas de services de soins à domicile dans la province du Manitoba, Canada (n = 855). Le lieu de résidence était classé soit petite ville urbaine ou zone principalement rurale. Un suivi de cinq ans a permis de déterminer l'utilisation subséquente de soins à domicile. Les résidents urbains étaient plus susceptibles de recevoir des soins à domicile que ceux des petites villes ou des zones principalement rurales. Les caractéristiques associées à l'usage étaient différentes selon le lieu de résidence, à l'exception du fonctionnement physique de base et des changements au plan du fonctionnement physique qui ressortaient constamment en raison de leur importance. L'orientation de la recherche ultérieure fait l'objet de discussion.

Type
Research Note/Note de recherche
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The Manitoba Study of Health and Aging (MSHA) was funded primarily by Manitoba Health (1990–1993) and Manitoba Health's Healthy Communities Development Fund (1995–1999). Additional funding was provided through the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) by the Seniors Independence Research Program of the National Health Research and Development Program of Health Canada (Project No. 6606-3954-MC(S)). The analysis reported here was supported by a New Emerging Team (Net) grant funded by CIHR's Institute of Aging and the Rural and Northern Health Research Initiative (HAS-63179). The results and conclusions are those of the authors and no official endorsement by Manitoba Health is intended or should be inferred. The contributions of MSHA Research Group members are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Allan, D., & Cloutier-Fisher, D. (2006). Health service utilization among older adults in British Columbia: Making sense of geography. Canadian Journal on Aging, 25(2), 219232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canadian Study of Health and Aging Working Group (1994). Canadian Study of Health and Aging: Study methods and prevalence of dementia. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 150, 899913.Google Scholar
Fillenbaum, G.C. (1988). Multidimensional functional assessment of older adults: The Duke Older American Resources and Services procedure. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Forbes, D.A., & Janzen, B.L. (2004). Comparison of rural and urban users and non-users of home care in Canada. Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine, 9, 227235.Google Scholar
Forbes, D.A., Morgan, D., & Janzen, B.L. (2006). Rural and urban Canadians with dementia: Use of health care services. Canadian Journal on Aging, 25(3), 321330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R., & Coyte, P. (2001). Determinants of home care utilization: Who uses home care in Ontario? Canadian Journal on Aging, (2), 175192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawranik, P. (2002). Inhome service use by caregivers and their elders: Does cognitive status make a difference? Canadian Journal on Aging, 21(2), 257271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefe, J., Fancey, P., Keating, N., Frederick, J., Eales, J., & Dobbs, B. (2004). Caring contexts of rural seniors: Phase 1—Technical report. Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta. Retrieved 16 Aug. 2007 from http://www.msvu.ca/mdcaging/PDFs/Technical%20report%20FINAL_Feb02.pdf.Google Scholar
Kirby, M.J. (2002). The health of Canadians: The federal role: Vol. 6. Recommendations for reform. Ottawa: Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Manitoba Study of Health and Aging Research Group (1995). Manitoba Study of Health and Aging final report: Technical section. Winnipeg, MB: University of Manitoba, Centre on Aging.Google Scholar
McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1996). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. (2nd ed.) New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Penning, M.J. (1995). Cognitive impairment, caregiver burden, and the utilization of home health services. Journal of Aging and Health, 7, 233253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radloff, L. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanow, R.J. (2002). Building on values: The future of health care in Canada. Ottawa: Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada.Google Scholar
Shapiro, E. (1986). Patterns and predictors of home care use by the elderly when need is the sole basis for admission. Home Health Care Services Quarterly, 7, 2944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, E., & Tate, R.B. (1997). The use and cost of community care services by elders with unimpaired cognitive function, with cognitive impairment/no dementia and with dementia. Canadian Journal on Aging, 16, 665681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada (1992). Profile of census divisions and subdivisions in Manitoba, Part A. 1991 Census of Canada. (Catalogue No. 95-358). Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada (2001). Statistical methods: Definitions of concepts and variables. Retrieved 19 September 2002 from http://www.statcan.ca/english/concepts/definitions.Google Scholar
Teng, E.L., & Chui, H.C. (1987). The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 48, 314318.Google ScholarPubMed
United States, General Accounting Office (1989). Rural development programs that focus on rural American and its economic development. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Wilkins, K., & Beaudet, M.P. (2000). Changes in social support in relation to seniors' use of home care. Health Reports, 11, 3947.Google ScholarPubMed