Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:31:53.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Health Care Aides' Struggle to Build and Maintain Relationships with Families in Complex Continuing Care Settings*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

Katherine S. McGilton ,
Sepali Guruge ,
Ruby Librado ,
Lois Bloch  and
Veronique Boscart
Katherine S. McGilton*
Affiliation:
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
Sepali Guruge
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, Ryerson University
Ruby Librado
Affiliation:
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Lois Bloch
Affiliation:
Baycrest Geriatric Health Care System
Veronique Boscart
Affiliation:
Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto
*
Requests for offprints should be sent to:/Les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à : Katherine McGilton, R.N., Ph.D., Research scientist, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, 130 Dunn Ave, Suite 236B, Toronto, ON M6K 2R7, ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on the relationships between health care aides (HCAs) and families of clients has been situated mainly in long-term care settings and includes scant findings about the perceptions of HCAs. Based on the findings of a larger qualitative study using a grounded theory approach, this paper addresses the topic of HCA–family relationships in complex continuing care (CCC). In-depth individual interviews with eight HCAs and a follow-up focus group with HCAs from three CCC facilities were analysed. Building relationships with families entailed “being there for them and their relatives”, while maintaining relationships involved “dealing with disappointments”. Factors influencing building and maintaining HCA–family relationships included “having supportive team members”, “having resources available”, and “functioning within care-team hierarchies”. The findings highlight the importance of minimizing the unit and organizational factors that disrupt HCA–family relationships.

Résumé

La recherche sur les relations entre les aides-soignants (AS) et les familles des clients est menée principalement dans le milieu des soins de longue durée, et elle offre peu de résultats sur la perception des AS. Sur la base des résultats d’une étude qualitative plus étendue à l'aide d’une méthode basée sur une théorie reposant sur les faits, le présent article traite des relations AS-famille dans le cadre de soins continus complexes (SCC). Des entrevues individuelles approfondies avec huit AS et un groupe de suivi avec les AS de trois établissements de SCC ont été analysées. l'établissement de relations avec les familles nécessitait «être présent pour eux et leurs parents», tout en maintenant des relations comprenant le fait d’avoir à «faire face à une déception». Parmi les facteurs influençant l'établissement et le maintien de relations AS-famille, il faut noter «avoir des membres d’un groupe de soutien», «avoir des ressources disponibles» et «établir une structure hiérarchique dans l'équipe des soins de santé». Les résultats soulignent l'importance de réduire l'unité et les facteurs organisationnels qui dérangent les relations AS-famille.

Keywords

vieillissementaides-soignantsaides-infirmièresrelation personnel-famillesoins continus complexessoins de longue duréeaginghealth care aidesnurse aidesstaff–family relationshipscomplex continuing carelong-term care
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , Summer/Été 2008 , pp. 135 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors thank the health care aides who participated in the study. This research has been supported by a grant from the Collaborative Research Program: Rehabilitation and Long-Term Care, and the Canadian Nurses Foundation. The authors also acknowledge funding from Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

References

Boise, L., & White, D. (2004). The family's role in person-centred care: Practice considerations. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing Mental Health Services, 42(5), 12–20.Google Scholar
Bowers, B.J. (1988). Family perceptions of care in a nursing home. Gerontologist, 28(3), 361–368.Google Scholar
Duncan, M.T., & Morgan, D.L. (1994). Sharing the caring: Family caregivers' views of their relationships with nursing home staff. Gerontologist, 34(2), 235–244.Google Scholar
Friedemann, M.L., Montgomery, R.J., Maiberger, B., & Smith, A. (1997). Family involvement in the nursing home: Family-oriented practices and staff–family relationships. Research in Nursing and Health, 20, 527–537.Google Scholar
Gaugler, J.E., & Ewen, H.H. (2005). Building relationships in residential long-term care: Determinants of staff attitudes toward family members. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 31(9), 19–26.Google Scholar
Gladstone, J., & Wexler, E. (2002). The development of relationships between families and staff in long-term care facilities: Nurses' perspectives. Canadian Journal of Aging, 21(2), 217–228.Google Scholar
Janzen, W. (2001). Long-term care for older adults: The role of the family. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 27(2), 36–43.Google Scholar
Keefe, J., & Fancey, P. (2000). The care continues: Responsibility for elderly relatives before and after admission to a long-term care facility. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 49(3), 235–244.Google Scholar
Laitinen, P., & Isola, A. (1996). Promoting participation of informal caregivers in the hospital care of the elderly patient: Informal caregivers' perceptions. Journal of Advanced Nursings, 23(5), 942–947.Google Scholar
Lau, V.M., & MacKenzie, A. (1996). Attributes of nurses that determine the quality of care for mentally handicapped people in an institution. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(6), 1109–1115.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2004). “Symbiotic niceness”: Constructing a therapeutic relationship in psychosocial palliative care. Social Science and Medicine, 58(12), 2571–2583.Google Scholar
McWilliam, C.L., Ward-Griffin, C., Sweetland, D., Sutherland, C., & O'Halloran, L. (2001). The experience of empowerment in in-home services delivery. Home Health Care Serices Quarterly, 20(4), 49–71.Google Scholar
Pillemer, K. (1996). Solving the frontline crisis in long-term care. Cambridge, MA: Frontline.Google Scholar
Robison, J., Curry, L., Gruman, C., Porter, M., Henderson, C., & Pillemar, K. (2007). Partners in caregiving in a special care environment: Cooperative communication between staff and families on dementia units. Gerontologist, 47(4), 504–515.Google Scholar
Ryan, A.A., & Scullion, H.F. (2000). Family and staff perceptions of the role of families in nursing homes. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(3), 626–634.Google Scholar
Sandberg, J., Nolan, M.R., & Lundh, U. (2002). Entering a new world: Empathic awareness as the key to positive family/staff relationships in care homes. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 39(5), 507–515.Google Scholar
Secrest, J., Iorio, D.H., & Martz, W. (2005). The meaning of work for nursing assistants who stay in long-term care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(8B), 90–97.Google Scholar
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ward-Griffin, C., Bol, N., Hay, K., & Dashnay, I. (2003). Relationships between families and registered nurses in long-term care facilities: A critical analysis. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 35(4), 150–174.Google Scholar