Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:56:52.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminist Methodologies: A Consideration of Principles and Practice for Research in Gerontology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Sheila M. Neysmith
Sheila M. Neysmith
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Feminist methodologies address the purpose and process of the research enterprise. They are not a particular set of techniques or procedures for gathering data. Rather they stem from the realization that it was the experiences of a very particular group of men, as both subject and object of enquiry, that defined social reality and the theories developed to explain our social worlds. This paper discusses some of the principles and approaches used by feminist researchers to explore the realities of women's lives. The author's research on home care workers, along with selected research in the field of aging, are used to illustrate the analysis and explore the implications of feminist methodologies for our understanding of aging in Canadian society.

Résumé

Les méthodologies féministes traitent de la raison d'être et des procédés du secteur de la recherche. Elles ne forment pas une série particulière de techniques ou de marches à suivre servant à compiler des données. Elles découlent plutôt de la constatation que l'existence d'un groupe d'hommes très particulier, tant sujet qu'objet de l'enquête, définissait la réalité sociale et les théories élaborées pour expliquer notre milieu social. Cet article aborde certains des principes et méthodes utilisés par des chercheures en vue d'étudier les réalités dans la vie des femmes. Le travail effectué par l'auteure sur les travailleurs en soins à domicile, ainsi que des recherches choisies dans le domaine du vieillissement servent à illustrer l'analyse et considérer les conséquences des méthodologies féminines afin de comprendre le vieillissement au sein de la société canadienne.

Keywords

WomenHomemakersAgingFeminist Praxis.Femmestravailleurs à domicilevieillissementpraxis féministe.
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 14 , Issue S1 , Été/Summer 1995 , pp. 100 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, E., & Nelson, M. (Eds.). (1990). Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women's Lives. Albany, NY: The State University of New York.Google Scholar
Arber, S., & Ginn, J. (1990). The Meaning of Informal Care: Gender and the Contribution of Elderly People. Ageing and Society, 10 (Part 4), 429–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, J., & Neysmith, S. (forthcoming). Invisible and Unarticulated Aspects of Home Care Help: “You're not just in there to do the work”. Gender and Society.Google Scholar
Baines, C., Evans, P., & Neysmith, S. (Eds.). 1991. Women's Caring: Feminist Perspectives on Social Welfare. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.Google Scholar
Biegel, D., & Blum, A. (1990). Ageing and Caregiving: Theory, Research and Policy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Code, L. (1991). What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, R.W. (1994). The State, Gender and Sexual Politics: Theory and Appraisal. In Radke, H.L. & Stam, H.J. (Eds.), Power/Gender Social Relations in Theory and Practice (pp. 136–173). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Cook, J., & Fonow, M. (1990). Knowledge and Women's Interests: Issues of Epistemology and Methodology in Feminist Sociological Research. In Nielson, J. (Ed.), Feminist Research Methods (pp. 69–93). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Dalley, G. (1988). Ideologies of Caring: Rethinking Community and Collectivism. Hampshire and London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Dobash, R.E., & Dobash, R. (1992). Women, Violence and Social Change. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Donovan, R. (1987). Home Care Work: A Legacy of Slavery in U.S. Health Care. Affilia, Fall (2), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulude, L. (1978). Women and Aging: A Report on the Rest of Our Lives. Ottawa: Advisory Council on the Status of Women.Google Scholar
Dulude, L. (1981) Pension Reform with Women in Mind. Ottawa: Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women.Google Scholar
Dwyer, J., & Coward, R. (Eds.). (1992). Gender, Families and Elder Care. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Eichler, M. (1988). Families in Canada Today: Recent Changes and Their Policy Consequences (2nd ed.). Toronto: Gage.Google Scholar
Essed, P. (1991). Understanding Everyday Racism: An Interdisciplinary Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estes, C., Swan, J., & Associates. (1993). The Long-Term Care Crisis: Elders Trapped in the No-Care Zone. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Evers, A., & van der Zanden, G. (Eds.). (1993). Better Care for Dependent People Living at Home: Meeting the New Agenda in Services for the Elderly. Bunnik, Holland: Netherlands Institute of Gerontology.Google Scholar
Finch, J., & Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating Family Responsibilities. London and New York: Tavistock/Routledge.Google Scholar
Fonow, M., & Cook, J. (1991). Back to the Future: A Look at the Second Wave of Feminist Epistemology and Methodology. In Fonow, M. & Cook, J. (Eds.), Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social History. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gee, E., & Kimball, M. (1987). Women and Aging. Toronto and Vancouver: Butter-worths.Google Scholar
Glenn, E. (1992). From Servitude to Service Work: Historical Continuities in the Racial Division of Paid Reproductive Labour. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 18(1), 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, L. (1988). Heros of Their Own Lives: The Politics and History of Family Violence. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Graham, H. (1993). Social Divisions in Caring. Women's Studies International Forum, 16(5), 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, E. (1990). Contemporary Theories of Power and Subjectivity. In Gunew, S. (Ed.), Feminist Knowledge: Critique and Construct (pp. 59–120). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gubrium, J., & Sankar, A. (Eds.). (1994). Qualitative Methods in Aging Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gunew, S. (1990). Feminist Knowledge: Critique and Construct. In Gunew, S. (Ed.), Feminist Knowledge: Critique and Construct (pp. 13–55). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1987). Introduction: Is There a Feminist Method? In Harding, S. (Ed.), Feminism and Methodology (pp. 1–14). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, L. (1990). Critical Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Joseph, C., & Rose, M. (1994). Female Incest Survivors: Caregiving for Aging Parents. Journal of Women and Aging, 6(3), 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, N., Kerr, K., Warren, S., Grace, M., & Wertenberger, D. (1994). Who's the Family in Family Caregiving? Canadian Journal on Aging, 13(2), 268–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, S., & McKenna, K. (1989). Experience, Research, Social Change: Methods From the Margins. Toronto: Garamond.Google Scholar
Leira, A. (1994). Concepts of Caring: Loving, Thinking, Doing. Social Service Review, 68(2), 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesemann, F., & Martin, G. (Eds.). (1993). Home-Based Care, the Elderly, the Family and the Welfare State: An International Comparison. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Levy, J. (1988). Gender Bias as a Threat to Construct Validity in Research Design. In Nebraska Sociological Feminist Collective. A Feminist Ethic for Social Science Research (pp. 139–157). Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
MacQuarrie, M., & Keddy, B. (1992). Women and Aging: Directions for Research. Journal of Women and Aging, 4(2), 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, T. (1989). Feminism and the New Crisis in Methodology. In Tomm, W. (Ed.), The Effects of Feminist Approaches on Research Methodologies. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
McDaniel, S. (1986). Canada's Aging Population. Toronto and Vancouver: Butterworths.Google Scholar
McDaniel, S., & McKinnon, A. (1993). Gender Differences in Informal Support and Coping Among Elders: Findings from Canada's 1985 and 1990 General Social Surveys. Journal of Women and Aging, 5(2), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, S., Heacock, P., & Beck, C. (1994). Nurse's Aides in Nursing Homes: A Study of Caregivers. Journal of Women and Aging, 6(1/2), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mies, M. (translated by A. Spencer). (1991). Women's Research or Feminist research: The debate surrounding feminist science and methodology. In Fonow, M. & Cook, J. (Eds.), Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, B. (1990). Gender Differences in Spouse Management of the Caregiver Role. In Abel, E. & Nelson, M. (Eds.), Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women's Lives. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Minnich, E. (1990). Transforming Knowledge. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Neuman, W.L. (1991). Social Research Methods. Boston: MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Neysmith, S. (1995). Power in Relationships of Trust: A Feminist Analysis of Elder Abuse. In MacLean, M. (Ed.), Abuse and Neglect of Older Canadians: Strategies for Change (pp. 43–54). Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
Neysmith, S. (forthcoming). Toward a Woman Friendly Long-Term Care Policy. In Evans, P. & Wekerle, G. (Eds.), Reconstructing the Welfare State: Women and the Canadian Experience. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Neysmith, S., & Nichols, B. (1994). Working Conditions in Home Care: A Comparison of Three Groups of Workers. Canadian Journal on Aging, 13(2), 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogg, J., & Munn-Giddings, C. (1993). Researching Elder Abuse. Ageing and Society, 13(Part 3): 389–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, C. (1993). Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: A Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, P., Brydon-Miller, , Hall, B., & Jackson, T. (1993). Voices of Change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada. Toronto: OISE Press.Google Scholar
Pascall, G. (1986). Social Policy: A Feminist Analysis. London and New York: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Pillemer, K., & Finkelor, D. (1988). The Prevalence of Elder Abuse: A Random Sample Survey. The Gerontologist, 28, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podnieks, E., Pillemer, K., Nicholson, J., Shillington, J., & Frizzell, A. (1989). National Survey on Abuse of the Elderly in Canada. Toronto: Office of Research and Innovation. Ryerson Politechnical Institute.Google Scholar
Prentice, A., Bourne, P., Brandt, G., Light, B., Mitchinson, W., & Black, N. (1988). Canadian Women: A History. Toronto: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Qureshi, H., & Walker, A. (1989). The Caring Relationship: Elderly People and Their Families. Hampshire and London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Senior Care. (1989). Basic Principles: A Careguide for Careworkers Providing In-Home Care to Clients Suffering from Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders. North York, ON: Senior Care.Google Scholar
Smith, D. (1987). The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Smith, D. (1990). The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Sollie, D., & Leslie, L. (Eds.). (1994). Gender, Families and Close Relationships: Feminist Research Journeys. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1993). Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tronto, J. (1992). Politics and Revision: The Feminist Project to Change the Boundaries of American Political Science. In Zalk, S. & Gordon-Kelter, J. (Eds.), Revolutions in Knowledge: Feminism in the Social Sciences (pp. 91–110). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ungerson, C. (Ed.). (1990). Gender and Caring: Work and Welfare in Britain and Scandinavia. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Ursel, J. (1992). Private Lives, Public Policy: One Hundred Years of State Intervention in the Family. Toronto: Women's Press.Google Scholar
Vinton, L. (1991). Abused Older Women: Battered Women or Abused Elders? Journal of Women and Aging, 3(3), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, G. (1990). Family Violence and the Woman's Movement: The Conceptual Politics of Struggle. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, M. (1988). Counting for Nothing: What Men Value and Women are Worth. New Zealand: Allen and Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, L.A., & Kroger, R.O. (1995). Discourse Analysis in Research on Aging. Canadian Journal on Aging, 14(suppl. 1), 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yllo, K., & Bogard, M. (Eds.). (1988). Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Zalk, S., & Gordon-Kelter, J. (Eds.). (1992). Revolutions in Knowledge: Feminism in the Social Sciences. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar