Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:40:44.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Théorie de la connaissance et théorie du parti chez Lénine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Denis Monière
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Robert Davidson
Affiliation:
Université d'Ottawa

Abstract

In the crisis that pervades Western Marxism, the question of the party and its relation to the masses occupies a central position. This article critically examines the Leninist conception of party, specifying those intrinsic limits which are linked to the theoretical and political context of the period in which it was elaborated. The authors raise the problem of the development of class consciousness and criticize the Leninist principle of the external character of class consciousness.

This theory in which the party is conceived as the master-thinker and theoretical guide of a proletariat dominated by its material conditions of existence rests on an epistemological justification: the theory of reflection. The authors retrace in Lenin's theory of knowledge the philosophical foundations of this conception which makes the party the mediator\bearer of the historical truth of the proletariat. In fact, for Lenin, the lack of consciousness of the working class is explained by its inability to pass beyond its class determination and to rise to a comprehension of contradiction. It is precisely by reason of this deep-seated narrowness of the working class that the party is indispensable in bringing knowledge of society in its totality to the proletariat.

A consequence of this theory of knowledge is to separate arbitrarily what is conceptualized and what exists, that is to say on one hand a knowledge produced and retained by intellectuals, and on the other a working class delivered over to a blind spontaneity, to ignorance. This position, taken to its extreme, can justify all forms of authoritarianism and elitism.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Circulaire adressée par Marx et Engels aux chefs de la social-démocratie allemande le 17 septembre 1879.

2 Pannekoek, Anton, Lenine philosophe (Paris: Spartacus, 1970)Google Scholar.

3 Lenine, , Matérialisme et empiriocriticisme (Paris: Editions sociales, 1976), 43Google Scholar.

4 Ibid., 44.

5 Ibid., 136.

6 Ibid., 132.

7 Ibid., 43.

8 Ibid., 31.

9 Ibid., 38.

10 Ibid., 43.

12 Ibid., 79.

13 Pannekoek, Lénine philosophe, 35.

14 Lénine, Matérialisme et empiriocriticisme, 13.

15 Lefebvre, H., Critique de la vie quotidienne (Paris: L'arche, 1958), tome 1, 103Google Scholar.

16 Lénine, Matérialisme et empiriocriticisme, 126–27.

17 Ibid., 125.

18 Ibid., 146.

20 Ibid., 181.

21 Ibid., 183.

22 Ibid., 133.

23 Ibid., 322, voir aussi 319.

24 Ibid., 321.

25 Lenine, , Les cahiers philosophiques (Paris: Editions sociales, 1955), 280–81Google Scholar.

26 Ibid., 110.

27 Ibid., 108.

28 Ibid., 107.

29 Ibid., 150–51.

30 Ibid., 148

31 Ibid., 126.

32 Ibid., 125.

33 Ibid., 126.

35 Ibid., 155–56.

36 Ibid., 76.

37 Ibid., 92.

38 Ibid., 179.

39 Ibid., 174.

41 Discours de Staline au Congrès des Soviets le 26 Janvier 1924. Cité par Lefebvre, H., Problèmes actuels du marxisme (Paris: P.U.F., 1963), 10Google Scholar.

42 Lenine, , Matérialisme et empiriocriticisme (Moscou: Editions en langues étrangères, 1962), 44Google Scholar.

43 Jakubowsky, F., Les superstructures idéologiques dans la conception matérialiste de l'histoire (Paris: E.D.I., 1971), 130Google Scholar.

44 Lenine, , « Thèse sur les tâches du LLe Congrès de l'lntemationale communiste », Oeuvres complètes (Moscow: Editions en langues étrangères, 1961), tome 31,189–90Google Scholar.

45 K. Marx, Oeuvres (Paris: La Pléiade), tome 1, 469.

46 Ibid., 172.

47 Cité par M. Rubel, La première Internationale ouvrière, Cahiers de l'ISEA, août 1969, 4.

48 Lénine, Cité par, Que faire? (Paris: Seuil, 1966), 9495Google Scholar.

49 Ibid., 95.

50 Ibid., 245.

51 Ibid., 85.

52 Ibid., 97.

53 Ibid., 84.

54 Ibid., 134–35.

55 Ibid., 135.

56 Ibid., 102.

57 Ibid., 107.

58 Ibid., 85.

59 Lenine, , Un pas en avant, deux pas en arrière (Moscou: Editions en langues étrangères, 1966), 266–67Google Scholar.

60 Cité par dans, J. J. Marie « Le dossier Que faire? », Que faire? (Paris: Seuil, 1966), 263Google Scholar.

61 Pannekoek, Lénine philosophe, 101–03.

62 Lénine au IVe Congrès de I'Internationale. Cité par Desanti, D., L'Internationale communiste (Paris: Payot, 1970), 116–17Google Scholar.