Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T23:23:18.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research Note: Rawls Revisited: Can International Criminal Law Exist?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2006

Kirsten J. Fisher
Kirsten J. Fisher*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
*
Kirsten J. Fisher, University of Western Ontario, Department of Political Science, Social Science Centre, London ON, Canada, N6A 5C2; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Questions concerning how Rawls's theory of justice accords with international criminal justice are largely ignored in favour of extensive debates on questions of distributive justice and how they relate to his theory and its international application. This lack of attention to international criminal law is significant since Rawls claims that his theory of justice is developed to correspond with recent dramatic shifts in international law. This paper argues that it is impossible for Rawls's account, state-centric as it is, to accord with advancements in international law that have increasingly asserted recognition of individuals in the global context.

Résumé

Résumé

Les questions concernant comment la théorie de justice de Rawls est en accord avec la justice criminelle internationale sont en grande partie ignorée, même pendant qu'en même temps sa théorie et son application internationale sont profondement discutée par rapport à la justice distributive. Ce manque d'attention à la loi criminelle internationale est important, puisque Rawls prétende que sa théorie de justice est développée en correspondance avec les récents changements dramatiques au niveau de la loi internationale. Cette exposé argumente qu'il est impossible que l'explication de Rawls, état-centré comme elle l'est, s'accorde avec les avancements en la loi internationale qui affirment de plus en plus la reconnaissance des individus dans le contexte global.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 407 - 420
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beitz, Charles R. 1979. Political Theory and International Relations. Revised edition, 1999. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles R. 2000. “Rawls's Law of Peoples.” Ethics 110 (4): 669–696.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R. 2001. “Human Rights as a Common Concern.” The American Political Science Review 95 (2): 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. 2000. “Rawls's Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World.” Ethics 110 (4): 697–721.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles. 1999. “The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism.” The Journal of Philosophy 96 (12): 599–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luban, David. 2004. “A Theory of Crimes against Humanity.” Yale Journal of International Law 29 (85): 86–167.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas W. 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Revised edition, 1999. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999a. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999b. Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1998. “Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.” http://www.un.org/law/icc/statute/romefra.htm (January 18, 2006).Google Scholar
United Nations. 2003. Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute (2002–). “Proposal submitted by Cuba on the definition of the crime of aggression and conditions for the exercise of jurisdiction.” Documents on the Crime of Aggression. http://www.un.org/law/icc/documents/aggression/aggressiondocs.htm (January 18, 2006).Google Scholar