Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:03:25.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Province under Pressure: Climate Change Policy in Alberta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2018

Brendan Boyd
Brendan Boyd*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Economics and Political Science, MacEwan University, Room 7-368, City Centre Campus, 10700–104 Avenue, Edmonton AB, T5J 4S2
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Alberta is responsible for over a third of Canada's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Reducing the country's emissions requires policies and initiatives that reduce emissions in the province. Yet the study of provincial climate change policy in Canada has largely focused on lower-emitting provinces like British Columbia, Quebec and Ontario. This article argues that Alberta is best understood as a “reluctant actor” on climate change, whose policies are influenced by decisions and pressures from outside its borders. The literature on Canadian-American environmental policy making and international policy transfer are used to explore provincial GHG targets and carbon pricing policies. The article finds that Alberta's 2002 targets and Specified Gas Emitters Regulation were determined by economic competitiveness and leakage concerns, while the adoption of new GHG targets in 2008 and a carbon tax was the result of policy transfer through political bandwagoning and the desire for reputational benefits.

Résumé

L'Alberta est responsable de plus du tiers des émissions de gaz à effet de serre (GES) du Canada. La réduction des émissions du pays exige des politiques et des initiatives qui réduisent les émissions dans la province. Pourtant, l'étude de la politique provinciale sur les changements climatiques au Canada s'est surtout concentrée sur les provinces à faibles émissions comme la Colombie-Britannique, le Québec et l'Ontario. Cet article soutient que l'Alberta est mieux comprise comme un « acteur réticent » du changement climatique, dont les politiques sont influencées par des décisions et des pressions de l'extérieur de ses frontières. La littérature sur l'élaboration des politiques environnementales entre le Canada et les États-Unis et le transfert des politiques internationales sert à explorer les objectifs provinciaux en matière de GES et des politiques de tarification du carbone. L'article conclut que les objectifs de 2002 de l'Alberta et l'actuel règlement Specified Gas Emitters Regulation ont été déterminés par des préoccupations relatives à la compétitivité économique et aux « fuites » de carbone, tandis que l'adoption de nouveaux objectifs en matière de GES en 2008 et d'une taxe sur le carbone a été le résultat d'un transfert de politiques s'expliquant par le suivisme politique et le désir de jouir des avantages d'une bonne réputation.

Type
Research Article/Étude originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 183 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

350.org. n.d. Tar Sands. https://350.org/category/topic/tar-sands/page/3/ (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Alberta. 2002a. Albertans and climate change: Taking action. Pub no. I/922. Edmonton, AB.Google Scholar
Alberta. 2002b. Alberta will continue to defend economy from Kyoto implementation, Klein says, news release, December 10, (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Alberta. 2004. Province introduces greenhouse gas reporting for large facilities, news release, October 21, (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Alberta. 2007. Alberta first province to legislate greenhouse gas reductions, news release, March 28, (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Alberta. 2008. Alberta's 2008 climate change strategy: Responsibility, leadership, action, (ISBN: 978-0-7785-6789-9). Edmonton, AB.Google Scholar
Alberta. 2015. Climate leadership plan speech, news release, November 22, (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Alberta. 2016a. Lecture on Alberta's climate leadership plan, news release, April 28, (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Alberta. 2016b. Climate Leadership Plan to reduce carbon pollution moves Alberta forward, news release, May 26, (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Alberta. 2017a. Fiscal Plan: Climate Leadership Plan. http://finance.alberta.ca/publications/budget/budget2017/fiscal-plan-climate-leadership-plan.pdf (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Alberta. 2017b. U.S.-Alberta relations. (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Alberta. 2017c. Major funding for diversified, low-carbon economy, news release, December 5, (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Bayrakal, S. 2006. “The determinants of convergence in Canada-U.S. Environmental policy-making: An automotive air pollution case study.” In Convergence and divergence in North America: Canada and the United States, ed. Froshauer, K., Fabbi, N. and Pell, S.. Vancouver: Centre for Canadian Studies.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. 1991. “How states utilise foreign evidence.” Journal of Public Policy 11: 31–45.Google Scholar
Benzie, R. and Gordon, S.. 2007. “McGuinty bitter after climate change rebuff.” Toronto Star, August 11, (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Bramley, M. 2002. An assessment of Alberta's climate change plan. Pembina Institute. (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Boychuk, G. and VanNijnatten, D.. 2004. “Economic integration and cross-border policy convergence.” Horizons 7 (1): 55–60.Google Scholar
Canada. Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2017. National Inventory Report 1990–2015: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada. (July 10, 2017).Google Scholar
Canada's Ecofiscal Commission. 2015. Provincial carbon pricing policies and competitiveness pressures. (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Carter, A., Fraser, G. and Zalik, A., A. 2017. “Environmental policy convergence in Canada's fossil fuel provinces? Regulatory streamlining, impediments, and drift.” Canadian Public Policy 43 (1): 61–76.Google Scholar
Denchak, M. 2015. The dirty fight over Canadian tar sands oil. Natural Resource Defence Council, news release, December 31, (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Doern, G.B., and Phidd, R.. 1992. Canadian public policy: Ideas, structures, processes. 2nd ed. Toronto: Nelson Canada.Google Scholar
Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. 1996. “Who learns what from whom? A review of the policy transfer literature.” Political Studies XLIV: 242–357.Google Scholar
Foulis, P. 2014. “British Columbia's carbon tax: The evidence mounts.” The Economist, July 31. (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Goulder, L. 2002. U.S. climate-change policy: The Bush administration's plan and beyond, policy brief. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research. (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Gravelle, T., Lachapelle, E.. 2015. “Politics, proximity and the pipeline: Mapping public attitudes toward Keystone XL.” Energy Policy 83: 99–108.Google Scholar
Haas, P. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination.” International Organization 46 (1): 1–35.Google Scholar
Harris, M., Beck, M. and Gerasimchuk, I.. 2015. The end of coal: Ontario's coal phase-out. International Institute for Sustainable Development. (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Harrison, K. 2006. “Provincial interdependence: Concepts and theories.” In Racing to the Bottom? Provincial interdependence in the Canadian federation, ed. Harrison, K.. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, K. 2012. “A Tale of Two Taxes: The Fate of Environmental Tax Reform in Canada.” Review of Policy Research 29: 383–407.Google Scholar
Hoberg, G. 1991. “Sleeping with an elephant: The American influence on Canadian environmental regulation.” Journal of Public Policy 11 (1): 107–32.Google Scholar
Hoberg, G. 1997. “Governing the environment: Comparing Canada and the United States.” In Degrees of freedom: Canada and the United States in a changing world, ed. Banting, K., Hoberg, G. and Simeon, R.. Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Hoberg, G. 2001. “Trade, harmonization, and domestic autonomy in environmental policy.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, Research and Practice 3: 191–217.Google Scholar
Hoberg, G. 2013. “The battle over oil sands access to tidewater: A political risk analysis of pipeline alternatives.” Canadian Public Policy 39 (3): 371–91.Google Scholar
Hoberg, G., Banting, K. and Simeon, R.. 2002. “The scope for domestic choice: Policy autonomy in a globalizing world.” In Capacity for choice: Canada in a new North America, ed. Hoberg, G.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hoberg, G. and Philllips, J.. 2011. “Playing defence: Early responses to conflict expansion in the oil sands policy subsystem.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 507–527.Google Scholar
Houle, D. 2014. Obstacles to carbon pricing in Canadian provinces. Sustainable Prosperity. http://institute.smartprosperity.ca/sites/default/files/SSRN-id2598985_0.pdf (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Houle, D. and MacDonald, D.. 2012. “Understanding the selection of policy instruments in Canadian climate-change policy.” Telescope 17 (2): 183–208.Google Scholar
Houle, D., Lachapelle, E. and Purdon, M.. 2015. “Comparative politics of sub-federal cap-and-trade: Implementing the Western Climate Initiative.” Global Environmental Politics 15 (3): 49–73.Google Scholar
Howlett, M. 1994. “The judicialization of Canadian environmental policy, 1980–1990: A test of the Canada-United States convergence thesis.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 27 (1): 99–127.Google Scholar
Howlett, M. 2000. “Beyond legalism? Policy ideas, implementation styles and emulation-based convergence in Canadian and US environmental policy.” Journal of Public Policy 20 (3): 305–29.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, J. 1990. “The international spread of privatisation policies: inducements, learning and policy bandwagoning.” In The political economy of public sector reform, ed. Suleiman, E. and Waterbury, J.. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency. 2016. World Energy Outlook 2016: Executive Summary. (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Gravelle, T. and Lachapelle, E.. 2015. “Politics, proximity and the pipeline: Mapping public attitudes toward Keystone XL.” Energy Policy 83: 99–108.Google Scholar
Litfin, K. 2000. “Advocacy coalitions along the domestic-foreign frontier: Globalization and Canadian climate change policy.” Policy Studies Journal 28 (1): 236–52.Google Scholar
MacDonald, D., and VanNijnatten, D.. 2010. Canadian climate policy and the North American influence. In Borders and bridges: Canada's policy relations in North America, ed. Hale, G. E. and Gattinger, M.. Don Mills ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patton, M.Q. 2002. Qualitative research methods in evaluation. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Porter, E. 2016. “Does a carbon tax work? Ask British Columbia.” New York Times, Mar 1. (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Rabe, B.G. 2004. Statehouse and greenhouse: The emerging politics of American climate change policy. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Rabe, B.G. 2007. “Beyond Kyoto: Climate change policy in multilevel governance systems.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 20 (3): 423–44.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. 1991. “Political conflict and lesson drawing.” Journal of Public Policy 11: 331–54.Google Scholar
Rose, R. 1993. Lesson-drawing in public policy: A guide to learning across time and space. Chatham NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Savage, L. 2013. “Redford interview: no plan for $40 carbon tax”. Maclean's, April 9. http://www.macleans.ca/uncategorized/redford-interview-no-plan-for-40-carbon-tax/ (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. 1988. “Systematically pinching ideas: A comparative approach to policy design.” Journal of Public Policy 8 (1): 61–80.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. 2016. “Developing green cities: Explaining variation in Canadian green building policy.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 621–41.Google Scholar
Stone, D. 2004. “Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘Transnationalisation of policy.’” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (3): 545–66.Google Scholar
Studer, I. 2013. Supply and demand for a North American climate regime. In Climate change policy in North America: Designing integration in a regional system, ed. Craik, N., Studer, I. and VanNijnatten, D.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
VanNijnatten, D. 2003. “Analyzing the Canada-US environmental relationship: A multifaceted approach.” American Review of Canadian Studies 33 (1): 93–120.Google Scholar
VanNijnatten, D. 2004. “Canadian-American environmental relations: Interoperability and politics.” American Review of Canadian Studies 34 (4): 649–64.Google Scholar
VanNijnatten, D. 2008. “Environmental policy in Canada and the US: Climate change and continuing distinctiveness.” In Canada and the United States: Differences that count, ed. Thomas, D. M. and Boyle Torrey, B.. 3rd ed. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, J. and Koontz, T. “Shifting winds: Explaining variation in state policies to promote small-scale wind energy.” Policy Studies Journal 38 (4): 629–51.Google Scholar
Wingrove, J., Walton, Dawn and Vanderklippe, Nathan. 2012. “Redford pledges $3-billion in oil-sands environmental research.” The Globe and Mail, March 28 (July 9, 2018).Google Scholar