Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T21:15:46.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Language Roadmaps in Canada: Understanding the Conservative Government's Approach to Official Languages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2015

Linda Cardinal ,
Helaina Gaspard  and
Rémi Léger
Linda Cardinal*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Helaina Gaspard*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Rémi Léger*
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
*
120 University, Room 5051, Faculty of Social Sciences Building, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Email: [email protected]
120 University, Room 5057, Faculty of Social Sciences Building, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Email: [email protected]
8888 University Drive, AQ-6056, Burnaby BC V5A 1S6, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article critically examines the Conservative government's approach to official languages, through a policy instrument framework. Special attention is paid to the third federal roadmap for official languages—the first having been unveiled by the Liberal government in 2003 and the second by the Conservative minority government in 2008—and how this roadmap conveys a new representation of official languages in relation to Canadian identity and citizenship. The focus on the linguistic integration of new immigrants in the 2013 language roadmap generates interest. The policy instrument framework also shows how language roadmaps represent the fourth generation of official language policies in Canada; the first three generations found their respective bases in the 1969 Official Languages Act, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the 1988 Official Languages Act. The article concludes that an analysis of language roadmaps elucidates transformations initiated by the Conservative governments in the area of official languages in Canada. It also promotes further exploration and analysis of language policies through the policy instrument framework.

Résumé

Dans cet article, les auteurs procèdent à une analyse critique de la politique du gouvernement conservateur du Canada dans le domaine des langues officielles en prenant appui sur l'approche des instruments. Ils étudient, de façon particulière, la publication de la troisième feuille de route sur les langues officielles–la première ayant été publiée par le gouvernement libéral en 2003 et la deuxième, par le gouvernement conservateur minoritaire en 2008–et montrent comment la feuille de route du gouvernement conservateur représente le véhicule d'une nouvelle représentation sur les langues officielles au Canada. Entre autres, l'accent sur l'intégration linguistique des immigrants dans la feuille de route de 2013 suscite l'intérêt. Grâce à l'approche des instruments, les auteurs montrent ainsi que les feuilles de route constituent une quatrième génération de politiques dans le domaine des langues officielles au Canada–les trois premières générations étant représentées par la Loi sur les langues officielles de 1969, la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés ainsi que la Loi sur les langues officielles de 1988. L'article conclut que l'analyse de la feuille de route sur les langues officielles du gouvernement conservateur permet de mieux comprendre les mutations initiées par le gouvernement conservateur dans le domaine des langues officielles au Canada depuis 2013. Les auteurs invitent aussi à approfondir l'approche des instruments comme des traceurs de changements pour l’étude des langues officielles au Canada.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 577 - 599
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Laban, Yasmeen and Couture, Claude. 2010. “Multiple minorities and deceptive dichotomies: The theoretical and political implications of the struggle for a public French education system in Alberta.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 43 (2): 433–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allard, Pierre. 2012. “Veut-on vraiment consulter?” Le Droit (Ottawa), August 13.Google Scholar
Banting, Keith. 2010. “Is There a Progressive's Dilemma in Canada? Immigration, Multiculturalism and the Welfare State.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 797–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banting, Keith et al. 2006. Open Federalism: Interpretations, Significance, Kingston: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations.Google Scholar
Bemelmans-Videc, Marie-Louis, Rist, Ray and Vedung, Evert. 1998. Carrots, Sticks and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Blake, Raymond. 2012. “A New Canadian Dynamism? From Multiculturalism and Diversity to History and to Core Values.” British Journal of Canadian Studies 26 (1): 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boily, Frédéric. 2013. La droite en Alberta: D'Ernest Manning à Stephen Harper. Québec: Les Presses de l'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Canada. Canadian Heritage. 2003. The Formative Evaluation of the “Interdepartmental Partnership with Official Language Communities” (IPOLC) Component of the Promotion of Official Languages Program. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada. Canadian Heritage. 2008. Roadmap for Canada's Linguistic Duality: Acting for the Future 2008–2013. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada. Canadian Heritage. 2013. Education, Immigration, Communities: Roadmap for Canada's Official Languages 2013–2018. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada. Citizenship and Immigration Canada. 2012. Discover Canada: The Rights and Responsibilities of Citizenship. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada. Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages. 2015. Appendix 4 Agreements between the federal government and the official language minority communities, Ottawa. (20 April 2015).Google Scholar
Canada. Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages. 1998. Government Transformations: The Impact on Canada's Official Languages Program. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada. Prime Minister of Canada. 2006. “Prime Minister Promotes Open Federalism.” Ottawa. (May 25, 2014).Google Scholar
Canada. Privy Council Office. 2003. The Next Act: New Momentum for Canada's Linguistic Duality Action Plan for Official Languages. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada. Statistics Canada. 2014. “Linguistic Characteristics of Canadians.” Ottawa: Minister of Industry. (May 21, 2015).Google Scholar
Canada. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. 2008. Roadmap for Canada's Linguistic Duality: Acting for the Future 2008–2013. Ottawa.Google Scholar
CBC News Online. 2012. “Long-form census cancellation taking toll on StatsCan data,” October 27.Google Scholar
Canadian Press. 2011. “A selection of controversial Harper quotes compiled by the Tories,” Globe and Mail (Toronto), April 2.Google Scholar
Canadian Press. 2012. “Long-form census cancellation taking toll on StatsCan data.” CBC News Politics, October 27. (February 22, 2015).Google Scholar
Cardinal, Linda. 2000. “Le pouvoir exécutif et la judiciarisation de la politique au Canada: une étude du Programme de contestation judiciaire.” Politique et Sociétés 20 (1): 43–65.Google Scholar
Cardinal, Linda. 2007. “New Approaches for the Empowerment of Linguistic Minorities: Policy Innovations in Canada in the 1990s.” In Language and Governance in Comparative Perspective, ed. Williams, Colin. Cardiff: Wales University Press.Google Scholar
Cardinal, Linda. 2010. “Language policy-making and planning in Québec and in Canada.” In Quebec Questions. Quebec Studies for the Twenty-First Century, ed. Rudy, Jarret, Gervais, Stéphan and Kirkey, Christopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cardinal, Linda. 2012. “Que restera-t-il du projet linguistique canadien en 2015?” In L’État du Québec 2012, ed. Institut du Nouveau Monde. Montréal: Boréal.Google Scholar
Cardinal, Linda. 2014. “Fédéralisme et langue.” In Le fédéralisme multinational: un modèle viable?, ed. Seymour, Michel and Laforest, Guy. Bruxelles: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cardinal, Linda and Juillet, Luc. 2005. “Les minorités francophones hors Québec et la gouvernance des langues officielles au Canada.” In La gouvernance linguistique: le Canada en perspective, ed. Wallot, Jean-Pierre. Ottawa: Les Presses de l'Université d'Ottawa.Google Scholar
Conservative Party of Canada. 2011. Policy Declaration. (February 8, 2014).Google Scholar
Coyne, Andrew. 2010. “Canada is a French Country.” Maclean's, July 19.Google Scholar
Deslisle, Jean. 2009. “Cinquante ans d'interprétation parlementaire.” Revue parlementaire canadienne 32 (2): 26–31.Google Scholar
Dion, Stéphane. 2013. “The Conservative Roadmap for Official Languages: Recycles Money, Partly Diverted towards Other Objectives than Linguistic Duality.” (February 8, 2015).Google Scholar
Farmer, Diane. 2008. “L'immigration francophone en contexte minoritaire: entre la démographie et l'identité.” In L'espace francophone en milieu minoritaire. Nouveaux enjeux, nouvelles mobilisations, ed. Thériault, Joseph Yvon, Gilbert, Anne and Cardinal, Linda. Montréal: Fidès.Google Scholar
Farney, James and Rayside, David, eds. 2013. Conservatism in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fédération des communautés francophones et acadienne (FCFA). 2013. “Nouvelle Feuille de route pour les langues officielles: un engagement positif, mais une analyse détaillée s'impose.” (April 2, 2013).Google Scholar
Flanagan, Tom. 2007. Harper's Team: Behind the Scenes in the Conservative Rise to Power. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Yvon and Johnson, Marc. 2005. “Transformations gouvernementales et langues officielles.” In La gouvernance linguistique: le Canada en perspective, ed. Wallot, Jean-Pierre. Ottawa: Les Presses de l'Université d'Ottawa.Google Scholar
Forgues, Éric. 2013. “La Feuille de route pour les langues officielles 2013–2018. Éducation, immigration, communauté.” Les Savoirs de la gouvernance communautaire 5 (1): 8–10.Google Scholar
Fraser, Graham. 2006. Sorry I Don't Speak French. Toronto: Douglas Gibson.Google Scholar
Gagnon, Lysiane. 2011. “Bilingualism needed? No for judges, yes for auditors-general.” Globe and Mail. November 7. (February 22, 2015).Google Scholar
Gaspard, Helaina. 2013. “Two ‘Official’ Languages of Work: Explaining the Persistence of Inequitable Access to French as a Language of Work in the Canadian Federal Public Service.” Doctoral dissertation. University of Ottawa: Ottawa.Google Scholar
Harper, Stephen. 2006. “Finie la polarisation!” La Presse (Montreal), April 21, A15.Google Scholar
Haque, Eve and Patrick, Donna. 2014. “Indigenous languages and the racial hierarchisation of language policy in Canada.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 36 (1): 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Christopher. 1986. The Tools of Government. Chatham: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Jenson, Jane. 1989. “Paradigms and Political Discourse: Protective Legislation in France and the United States before 1914.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 22 (2): 235–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenson, Jane. 2013. “Historical Transformations of Canada's Social Architecture: Institutions, Instruments, and Ideas.” In Inequality and the Fading of Redistributive Politics, ed. Banting, Keith and Myles, John. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Mark. 2013. “The Conservative Plan to Become Canada's Natural Governing Party.” National Post, October 14. (February 21, 2015).Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2010. “Testing the Liberal Multiculturalist Hypothesis: Normative Theories and Social Science Evidence.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 43 (2): 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1998. Finding Our Way. Rethinking Ethnocultural Relations in Canada. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laforest, Rachel. 2011. Voluntary Sector Organization and the State. Vancouver: UBC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lascoumes, Pierre and Le Galès, Patrick. 2004. “Introduction: L'action publique saisie par ses instruments.” In Gouverner par les instruments, ed. Lascoumes, Pierre and Le Galès, Patrick. Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Lascoumes, Pierre and Le Galès, Patrick. 2007. “Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through Its Instruments—From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 20 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Léger, Rémi. 2013. “La nouvelle gouvernance des langues officielles au Canada: entre exigences et circonstances.” Canadian Public Administration 56 (3): 414–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, Preston. 1992. The New Canada. Toronto: MacMillan Canada.Google Scholar
Marwah, Inder, Triadafilopoulos, Triadafilos and White, Stephen. 2013. “Immigration, Citizenship, and Canada's New Conservative Party.” In Conservatism in Canada, ed. Farney, James and Rayside, David. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Martel, Marcel and Pâquet, Martin. 2012. Speaking Up: A History of Language and Politics in Canada and Québec. Toronto: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
MacMillan, Michael. 1998. The Practice of Language Rights in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRoberts, Kenneth. 1997. Misconceiving Canada: The Struggle for National Unity. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Montpetit, Éric. 2007. Le fédéralisme d'ouverture. Québec: Septentrion.Google Scholar
Nimijean, Richard. 2005. “Articulating the “Canadian Way”: Canada and the Political Manipulation of the Canadian Identity.” British Journal of Canadian Studies 18 (1): 26–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normand, Martin. 2013. “De l'arène politique à l'arène juridique: les communautés francophones minoritaires au Canada et la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés.” In Le nouvel ordre constitutionnel canadien: du rapatriement de 1982 à nos jours, ed. Rocher, François et Pelletier, Benoît. Québec: Presses de l'Université du Québec.Google Scholar
Orfali, Phillipe. 2012. “L'unilinguisme du député Gourde décrié.” Le Droit (Montreal), (February 2, 2015).Google Scholar
Orfali, Philippe. 2013. “Feuille de route: Graham Fraser y voit du positif, mais…” Le Droit (Montreal), (April 2, 2014).Google Scholar
Patten, Steve. 2013. “The Triumph of Neoliberalism within Partisan Conservatism in Canada.” In Conservatism in Canada, ed. Farney, James and Rayside, David. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Réaume, Denise. 2003. “Beyond Personality: The Territorial and Personal Principles of Language Policy Reconsidered.” In Language Rights and Political Theory, ed. Kymlicka, Will and Patten, Alan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Savoie, Donald. 1998. Official-Language Minority Communities: Promoting a Government Objective. Report prepared for the Privy Council, the Department of Canadian Heritage and the Treasury Board Secretariat. Ottawa.Google Scholar