Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:13:05.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political Journalism Represented by Headline News: Canadian Public and Commercial Media Compared

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2013

Blake Andrew*
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
*
Blake Andrew, Département de science politique, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, Succ. Centre-ville, Montreal QC H3C 3J7, [email protected]

Abstract

Abstract. Headlines play a key role in influencing how and about what citizens are informed. In news media, their task is threefold: to represent stories, signal informational hierarchy and draw publicity for (or sell) what follows. This article examines the representative dimension of headline news content for the 2006 Canadian federal election campaign, testing whether public media headlines more faithfully reflected story-level coverage than commercial media. Comparing both public and commercial media coverage of this watershed election presents a unique opportunity to assess whether the overarching macro-incentive of commercial media—profit-making—may have influenced micro-level relationships between headlines and stories. Results of 55-day multiplatform analysis (N = 11,002) involving CBC election media and 12 commercial newsrooms reveal few differences with respect the representativeness of headlines from public and commercial media, save for the presence of journalists' opinion in headline content.

Résumé. Les titres influencent comment les citoyens sont informés, et à propos de quoi ils en pensent. Les titres ont trois objectifs dans les nouvelles : ils résument les nouvelles, signalent quelles nouvelles sont les plus importantes, et vendre l'histoire complète qui suit. L'article examine le niveau de représentativité des titres dans les nouvelles sur la campagne de l'élection fédérale canadienne de 2006. Plus précisément, il teste si les titres venant des médias publics sont plus représentatifs que les nouvelles dans le média commercial. En comparant la couverture médiatique dans cette élection structurante, nous explorons si la motivation des médias commerciaux, notamment le profit, peut influencer le lien entre les titres et les articles. Les résultats de l'analyse multiplateforme de la campagne qui durait 55 jours (N = 11 002) incluent la couverture sur la CBC et 12 médias commerciaux. Ils indiquent qu'il n'y a pas beaucoup de différence dans la représentativité des titres entre les sources publiques et commerciales, sauf la présence de l'opinion dans le contenu des titres.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalberg, Toril, van Aelst, Peter and Curran, James. 2010. “Media Systems and the Political Information Environment: A Cross-National Comparison.” International Journal of Press/Politics 15 (3): 255–71.Google Scholar
Aarts, Kees and Semetko, Holli A.. 2003. “The Divided Electorate: Media Use and Political Involvement.” Journal of Politics 65 (3): 759–84.Google Scholar
Althaus, Scott L., Edy, Jill A. and Phalen, Patricia F.. 2001. “Using Substitutes for Full-Text News Stories in Content Analysis: Which Text Is Best?American Journal of Political Science 45 (3): 707–23.Google Scholar
Althaus, Scott L., Edy, Jill A. and Phalen, Patricia F.. 2002. “Using the Vanderbilt Television Abstracts to Track Broadcast News Content: Possibilities and Pitfalls.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 46 (3): 473–92.Google Scholar
Andrew, Blake C. 2007. “Media-Generated Shortcuts: Do Newspaper Headlines Present Another Roadblock for Low Information Rationality?International Journal of Press/Politics 12 (2): 2444.Google Scholar
Bardoel, Johannes and d'Haenens, Leen. 2008. “Reinventing Public Service Broadcasting in Europe: Prospects, Promises and Problems.” Media, Culture & Society 30 (3): 337–55.Google Scholar
Barnhurst, Kevin G. 1994. Seeing the Newspaper. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1991. The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bennett, Lance and Iyengar, Shanto. 2008. “A New Era of Minimal Effects: The Changing Foundations of Political Communication.” Journal of Communication 58 (4): 707–31.Google Scholar
Brants, Kees. 2003. “Auditing Public Broadcasting Performance: Its Theory and Practice.” Javnost 10 (3): 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canada. Parliament. 1991. Broadcasting Act (S.C. 1991, c. 11). http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/b-9.01/page-2.html (June 12, 2013).Google Scholar
Cappella, Joseph N. and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caulfield, Timothy and Bubela, Tania. 2004. “Media Representations of Genetic Discoveries: Hype in the Headlines?Health Law Review 12 (2): 5361.Google Scholar
CBC/Radio Canada. 2007. Annual Report of CBC/Radio-Canada 2007–2008. http://www.cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/reporting-to-canadians/reports/financial-reports/annual-report-archives/ (June 12, 2013).Google Scholar
Condit, Celeste M., Alex Ferguson, Rachel Kassel, Chitra Thadhani, Holly Catherine Gooding Roxanne Parrott. 2001. “An Exploratory Study of the Impact of News Headlines on Genetic Determinism.” Science Communication 22 (4): 379–95.Google Scholar
Connolly, Sara and Hargreaves-Heap, Shaun P.. 2007. “Cross Country Differences in Trust in Television and the Governance of Public Broadcasters.” Kyklos 60 (1): 314.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P.. 2001. Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Debrett, Mary. 2009. “Riding the Wave: Public Service Television in the Multi-Platform Era.” Media, Culture and Society 31 (5): 807–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eveland, William P. Jr. and Dunwoody, Sharon. 2002. “An Investigation of Elaboration and Selective Scanning as Mediators of Learning from the Web versus Print.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 46 (1): 3453.Google Scholar
Fenichel, Michael and Dan, Peter. 1980. “Heads from Post and Times on Three-Mile Island.” Journalism Quarterly 57 (2): 338–39.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Frederick J. 1991. Reporting the Campaign: Election Coverage in Canada. Toronto: Dundurn.Google Scholar
Flynn, James, Peters, Ellen, Mertz, C. K. and Slovic, Paul. 1998. “Risk, Media, and Stigma at Rocky Flats.” Risk Analysis 18 (6): 715–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Linda L. and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2009. “Looking for Sex in All the Wrong Places: Press Coverage and the Electoral Fortunes of Gubernatorial Candidates.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (3): 519–36.Google Scholar
Gandy, Oscar H. Jr., Kopp, Katharina, Hands, Tanya, Frazer, Karen and Phillips, David. 1997. “Race and Risk: Factors Affecting the Framing of Stories about Inequality, Discrimination, and Just Plain Bad Luck.” Public Opinion Quarterly 61 (1): 158–82.Google Scholar
Garcia, Mario R. and Stark, Pegie. 1991. Eyes on the News. St. Petersburg: Poynter.Google Scholar
Garst, Robert and Bernstein, Theodore. 1961. Headlines and Deadlines: A Manual for Copy Editors. 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Geer, John G. and Kahn, Kim F.. 1993. “Grabbing Attention: An Experimental Investigation of Headlines during Campaigns.” Political Communication 10 (2): 175–91.Google Scholar
Graber, Doris A. 1988. Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. 2nd ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Gunter, Barrie. 1987. Poor Reception: Misunderstanding and Forgetting Broadcast News. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hallin, Daniel C. and Mancini, Paolo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James T. 2004. All the News That's Fit to Sell. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James T. 2010. “The (Many) Markets for International News: How News from Abroad Sells at Home.” Journalism Studies 11 (5): 650–66.Google Scholar
Hanretty, Chris. 2010. “Explaining the De Facto Independence of Public Broadcasters.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 7589.Google Scholar
Hayes, Danny and Guardino, Matt. 2010. “Whose Views Made the News? Media Coverage and the March to War in Iraq.” Political Communication 27 (1): 5987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtz-Bacha, Christina, and Norris, Pippa. 2001. ““To Entertain, Inform, and Educate”: Still the Role of Public Television.” Political Communication 18 (2): 123–40.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Curran, James, Lund, Anker Brink, Salovaara-Moring, Inka, Hahn, Kyu S. and Coen, Sharon. 2010. “Cross-National versus Individual-Level Differences in Political Information: A Media Systems Perspective.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 20 (3): 291309.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Hahn, Kyu S., Bonfadelli, Heinz and Marr, Mirko. 2009. “‘Dark Areas of Ignorance’ Revisited: Comparing International Affairs Knowledge in Switzerland and the United States.” Communication Research 36 (3): 341–58.Google Scholar
Kolmer, Christian and Semetko, Holli A.. 2010. “International Television News: Germany Compared.” Journalism Studies 11 (5): 700717.Google Scholar
Larsen, Håkon. 2010. “Legitimation Strategies of Public Service Broadcasters: The Divergent Rhetoric in Norway and Sweden.” Media, Culture and Society 32 (2): 267–83.Google Scholar
León, José. 1997. “The Effects of Headlines and Summaries on News Comprehension and Recall.” Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 9 (2): 85106.Google Scholar
Marcotte, Philippe and Bastien, Frédérick. 2012. “L'influence du mode de financement des médias audiovisuels sur le cadrage des campagnes: le cas des élections canadiennes de 2005–2006 et 2008.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 313–36.Google Scholar
Marquez, F.T. 1980. “How Accurate Are the Headlines.” Journal of Communication 30 (3): 3036.Google Scholar
McCombs, Maxwell E. and Shaw, Donald L.. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (2): 176–87.Google Scholar
McManus, John. 1994. Market-Driven Journalism: Let the Citizen Beware. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Mindich, David T. Z. 1998. Just the Facts: How “Objectivity” Came to Define American Journalism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Niven, David. 2002. Tilt? The Search for Media Bias. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E. 1994. Out of Order. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Peter, Jochen and de Vreese, Claes H.. 2004. “In Search of Europe: A Cross-National Comparative Study of the European Union in National Television News.” International Journal of Press/Politics 9 (4): 324.Google Scholar
Pfau, Michael R. 1995. “Covering Urban Unrest: The Headline Says It All.” Journal of Urban Affairs 17 (2): 131–41.Google Scholar
Popescu, Marina, and Toka, Gabor. 2009. “Public Television, Private Television and Citizens' Political Knowledge.” EUI Working Papers RSCAS 66.Google Scholar
Raboy, Marc. 1996. “Canada: The Hybridization of Public Broadcasting.” In Public Broadcasting for the 21st Century, ed. Raboy, Marc. Luton: University of Luton Press.Google Scholar
Riffe, Daniel, Lacy, Stephen and Fico, Frederick. 2005. Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rosenstiel, Tom, Just, Marion, Belt, Todd, Dean, Walter and Chinni, Dante. 2007. We Interrupt This Newscast: How to Improve Local News and Win Ratings, Too. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schudson, Michael. 1978. Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Smith, Ted J. III, and Verrall, Derek O.. 1985. “A Critical Analysis of Australian Television Coverage of Election Opinion Polls.” Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (1): 5879.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart. 2002. Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart, Andrew, Blake, Aalberg, Toril, Iyengar, Shanto, Curran, James, Coen, Sharon, Hayashi, Kaori, Jones, Paul, Mazzoleni, Gianpetro, Rhee, June Woong, Rowe, David and Tiffen, Rod. 2012. “Auntie Knows Best: Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge.” British Journal of Political Science FirstView http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000555 (June 12, 2013).Google Scholar
Stamm, Keith R. and Jacoubovitch, M. Daniel. 1980. “How Much Do They Read in the Daily Newspaper: A Measurement.” Journalism Quarterly 57 (2): 234–42.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, Percy H. 1953. “The Effect of Headlines on the Interpretation of News Stories.” Journalism Quarterly 30: 189–97.Google Scholar
Trimble, Linda and Sampert, Shannon. 2004. “Who's in the Game? Framing of the Canadian Election 2000 by The Globe and Mail and The National Post.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 5171.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicolas A., Banks, Antoine J., Hutchings, Vincent L. and Davis, Anne K.. 2009. “Selective Exposure in the Internet Age: The Interaction between Anxiety and Information Utility.” Political Psychology 30 (4): 591613.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1988. News as Discourse. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Waddell, Christopher and Dornan, Chris. 2006. “The Media and the Campaign.” In The Canadian Federal Election of 2006, ed. Dornan, Chris and Pammett, Jon H.. Toronto: Dundurn.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1998. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1996. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
West, Darrell M. 1994. “Political Advertising and News Coverage in the 1992 California U.S. Senate Campaigns.” The Journal of Politics 56 (4): 1053–75.Google Scholar