Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:19:03.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Les réseaux militaires et la convergence de la sécurité internationale par les pratiques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2015

Abstract

Western powers have created a wide range of military networks whose operating modes remain largely unknown to us. While the subfield of International Relations debates the ability of networks to generate convergence, this article addresses this debate with a longitudinal study of one such military network: the Multinational Interoperability Council (MIC). Our analysis reveals that, despite limited resources and influence, members of the MIC produce an identity, norms and capabilities for collective action that are specific to the network. They are able to mobilise them strategically in order to produce soft convergence in the area of military coalition building.

Résumé

Les puissances occidentales ont créé une vaste gamme de réseaux militaires dont nous ignorons largement les dynamiques de fonctionnement. Alors que la discipline des relations internationales débat sur les capacités de convergence des réseaux, cet article présente une première étude longitudinale d'un réseau militaire le Multinational Interoperability Council (MIC). Notre analyse révèle que, malgré une influence et des ressources limitées, les militaires du MIC produisent une identité, des normes ainsi que des capacités d'action collectives qui leur sont propres, et qu'ils ont mobilisées stratégiquement pour produire de la convergence douce, par le bas, en matière de création de coalition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

Adler, Emmanuel et Barnett, Michael (dirs.). 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emmanuel et Pouliot, Vincent (dirs.). 2011. International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, et Pouliot, Vincent. 2014. «Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya». European Journal of International Relations 20 (4): 889911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Michael M. et Coleman, William. 1992. «Policy Networks, Policy Communities and the Problems of Governance». Governance 5 (3): 154180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, David et Newman, Abraham L.. 2010. «Transgovernmental Networks and Domestic Policy Convergence : Evidence from Insider Trading Regulation». International Organization 64 (3): 505528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, et Finnemore, . 2004. Rules of the World : International Organizations in World Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre et Wacquant, Loïc J.D.. 1992. Réponses. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. «Esprits d’État» Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 9697.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian. 2014. «Pathways to practice: praxiography and international politics». European Political Science Review 6 (3): 383406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 2007. Brokerage & Closure : An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cao, Xun. 2009. «Networks of Intergovernmental Organizations and Convergence in Domestic Economic Policies». International Studies Quaterly 35: 10851130.Google Scholar
Cao, Xun. 2012. «Global Networks and Domestic Policy Convergence A Network Explanation of Policy Changes». World Politics 64 (3): 375425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves et Garth, Brian G.. 2011. «Hegemonic Battles, Professional Rivalries, and the International Division of Labor in the Market for the Import and Export of State-Governing Expertise». International Political Sociology 5 (3): 276293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowding, Keith. 1995. «Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach». Political Studies 43 (1): 136158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2001. «Globalization and Policy Convergence». International Studies Review 3 (1): 5378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsig, Manfred. 2010. «Principal–agent theory and the World Trade Organization: Complex agency and ‘missing delegation’». European Journal of International Relations 17 (3): 495517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forget, Amélie et Rayroux, Antoine. 2012 «Introduction. La sécurité européenne et le tournant pratique en relations internationales». Études internationales 43 (4): 501519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Kahler, Miles et Montgomery, Alexander H.. 2009. «Network Analysis for International Relations». International Organization 63 (3): 559592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. et Montgomery, Alexander H.. 2006. «Power Positions : International Organizations, Social Networks and Conflict». The Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (1): 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1992. «Introduction : Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination». International Organization 46 (1): 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Darren G. et al. (dirs). 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, Simon. 2010. «The necessity of protection: Transgovernmental networks and EU security governance». Cooperation & Conflict 45 (3): 312330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael. 2002. «Do Networks Matter? Linking Policy Network Structure to Policy Outcomes: Evidence from Four Canadian Policy Sectors 1990–2000». Revue canadienne de science politique 35 (2): 235267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles (dir.). 2009. Networked Politics : Agency, Power and Governance. Ithaca : Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (dir.). 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kauppi, Nilo. 2003. «Bourdieu's political sociology and the politics of European integration». Theory and Society 32: 775789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. et Sikkink, Kahryn (dirs.). 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. et Nye, Joseph S.. 1987. «Power and Interdependence Revisited». International Organization 41 (4): 725753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, Christopher. 2005. «Introduction : Cross-national policy convergence: concepts, approaches and explanatory factors». Journal of European Public Policy 12 (5): 764774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoke, David. 1993. «Network of Elite Structure and Decision Making». Sociological Method & Research 22 (1): 2345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoke, David et Kaufman, Naomi J.. 1994. «Organizational Power». Knoke, Dans David, Political Networks : A Structural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krahmann, Elke. 2005. «Security Governance and Networks: New Theoretical Perspectives in Transatlantic Security». Cambridge Review of International Affairs 18 (1): 1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty : Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, Kjuperman, Ranan D., Terris, Lesley G. et Talmud, Ilan. 2006. «Structural Equivalence and International Conflict: A Social Network Analysis». Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (5): 664689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mérand, Frédéric. 2010. «Pierre Bourdieu and the Birth of European Defense». Security Studies 19 (2): 342374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mérand, Frédéric, Hofmann, Stéphanie C. et Irondelle, Bastien. 2011. «Governance and State Power: A Network Analysis of European Security». Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1): 121147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mérand, Frédéric et Pouliot, Vincent. 2008. «Le monde de Pierre Bourdieu : éléments d'une théorie sociale des Relations internationales». Revue canadienne de science politique 41 (3): 603625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MIC. 2000a. Topic : Role of the MIC. Washington: Secrétariat exécutif.Google Scholar
MIC. 2000b. Topic : Broadening MIC Membership.Washington D.C: Secrétariat exécutif.Google Scholar
MIC. 2001. MIC Coalition Building Handbook. Arlington : Secrétariat exécutif.Google Scholar
MIC. 2002a. Charter of the Multinational Interoperability Council (2 e édition). Arlington: Secrétariat exécutif.Google Scholar
MIC. 2002b. Strategic Plan 2002. Washington D.C.: Secrétariat exécutif.Google Scholar
MIC. 2005. MIC Membership Policies and Procedures. Washington D.C.: Secrétariat exécutif.Google Scholar
MIC. 2006. Report on Capstone SPS Meeting November 13–16 2006. Washington: Secrétariat exécutif.Google Scholar
MIC. 2007. Talking Paper : MIC Marketing. Washington D.C.: Secrétariat exécutif.Google Scholar
MIC. 2008. MIC Standing Operating Procedures (SOP) 2008. Washington D.C.: Secrétariat exécutif.Google Scholar
MIC. 2010. Report on MIC 2010 June 15–17 2010. Washington D.C.: Secrétariat exécutif.Google Scholar
MIC. 2012. Rapid Reconnaissance Handbook for Humanitarian/Disaster Response. Washington D.C.: Secrétariat exécutif.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel H. 2009. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe : Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires & International Change. Princeton : Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. 2013 (2 e édition). World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. New York : Routledge.Google Scholar
Peacock, Walter Gillis, Hoover, Greg A. et Killian, Charles D.. 1988. «Divergence and Convergence in International Development: A Decomposition Analysis of Inequality in the World System». American Sociological Review 53 (6): 838852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2010. International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2013. «Methodology». Dans dir. Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, Bourdieu in International Relations : Rethinking key concepts in IR. New York : Routldege.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. «Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games». International Organization 43 (3): 427460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathbun, Brian. 2008. «Interviewing and Qualitative Field Methods: Pragmatism and Practicalities». Dans dirs. M-Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David, The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., et Volden, Craig. 2008. «The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion». American Journal of Political Science 52: 840857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank, et Garrett, Geoffrey. 2008. «Introduction: The Diffusion of Liberalization». Dans dirs Simmon, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank, and Garrett, Geoffrey, The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton : Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, David et Kick, Edward L.. 1979. «Structural Position in the World System and Economic Growth 1955–1970 : A Multiple-Network Analysis of Transnational Interactions». American Journal of Sociology 84 (5): 109126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Camber T. 2010. «The Geometry of Security : Modeling Interstate Alliances as Evolving Networks». Journal of Peace Research 47 (6): 697709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. «Anarchy is what States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics». International Organization 46 (2): 391425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Wendy H. 2012. Internal Affairs : How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights. Ithaca : Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaiotti, Ruben. 2012. «Practicing Homeland Security across the Atlantic: Practical Learning and Policy Convergence in North America and Europe». European Security 21 (3): 328346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar