Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:53:23.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

La politique du salaire minimum : le rôle des partis politiques dans les pays de l'OCDE (1960–2014)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2019

Dominic Durocher
Dominic Durocher*
Affiliation:
École d’études politiques, Université d'Ottawa, Pavillon des Sciences sociales, 120 Université, Université d'Ottawa, Ottawa, (Ontario), K1N6N5, Courriel: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Résumé

L'enjeu politique de la fixation du salaire minimum a été relativement peu étudié en science politique. Dans cet article, nous examinons le rôle des partis politiques de gauche sur la fixation du salaire minimum. Comme prédit par la théorie des ressources du pouvoir, les partis de gauche devraient encourager l'augmentation du salaire minimum. Nous postulons toutefois que cet effet diffère selon le niveau de corporatisme. Plus particulièrement, nous pensons que l'effet des partis politiques de gauche devrait être plus faible sous des niveaux de corporatisme élevés puisque les partenaires sociaux sont davantage consultés et que les gouvernements ont tendance à leur déléguer la régulation des salaires. Nos résultats confirment ces hypothèses. Ils indiquent que le salaire minimum tend à augmenter lorsque les gouvernements sont davantage à gauche idéologiquement et que cette relation est plus forte lorsque le degré de corporatisme est faible.

Abstract

The political issue of setting the minimum wage rate has been relatively little studied in political science. In this article, we analyze the influence of left-wing political parties on minimum wage rates. As predicted by power resource theory, the presence of left-wing parties in government should result in higher minimum wage rates. However, we postulate that the effect of left-wing parties is influenced by the degree of corporatism. More specifically, we find that the effect of left-wing parties is lower when corporatism is strong, because governments tend to consult social partners more and allow them to handle wage regulation. Our results confirm these hypotheses. They indicate that minimum wage rates tend to increase when governments are more left-wing and that this relation is stronger when corporatism is weak.

Keywords

salaire minimumparti politiquecorporatismeredistributionminimum wagepolitical partycorporatismredistribution
Type
Research Article/Étude originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 229 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographie

Allan, James P. et Scruggs., Lyle 2004. «Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies». American Journal of Political Science 48: 496–512.Google Scholar
Annual macro-economic database of the European Commission (AMECO). 2017. Unemployment rate total. <http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/ameco/user/serie/ResultSerie.cfm> (consulté le 13 mars 2017).+(consulté+le+13+mars+2017).>Google Scholar
Armingeon, Klaus, Wenger, Virginia, Wiedemeier, Fiona, Isler, Christian, Knöpfel, Laura, Weisstanner, David et Engler., Sarah 2017. Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2015. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.Google Scholar
Bandau, Frank. 2017. «The Impact of Partisanship in the Era of Retrenchment. Insights from Quantitative Welfare State Research». SSRN electronic journal.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2008. Unequal Democracy The Policial Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel et Katz., Jonathan 2011. «Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series Cross-Section Political Economy Data». Annual Review of Political Science 14: 331–352.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Cousineau, Jean-Michel, et McRoberts., Kenneth 1989. «The Determinants of Minimum Wage Rates». Public Choice 62: 15–24.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian. 2013. «The Standard Left-Right scale». The Manifesto project. <https://manifestoproject.wzb.eu/down/papers/budge_right-left-scale.pdf> (consulté le 5 mars 2017).+(consulté+le+5+mars+2017).>Google Scholar
Bugge, Axel. 2017. «As Europe left struggles, Portugal's alliance wins over voters and Brussels». Reuters. <http://www.reuters.com/article/us-portugal-politics-idUSKBN1721LF> (consulté le 15 juin 2017).+(consulté+le+15+juin+2017).>Google Scholar
Card, David, et Krueger., Alan 1994. « Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the FastFood Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania ». American Economic Review 84: 772–793.Google Scholar
Card, David et Kruger., Alan 1995. Myths and measurement: the new economics of the minimum wage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Corluy, Vincent et Vandenbroucke., Frank 2014. «Individual Employment, Household Employment, and Risk of Poverty in the European Union: A Decomposit Analysis». Dans Reconciling Work and Poverty Reduction, dir. Cantillon, Bea et Vandenbroucke, Frank. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Beer, P.T., Been, W., Salverda, W. 2017. «The interplay between the minimum wage and collective bargaining in the Netherlands. An overview and a case study of three sectors». Universiteit van Amsterdam, AIAS Working Paper 173.Google Scholar
De Boef, Suzanna, et Keele., Luke 2008. «Taking Time Seriously». American Journal of Political Science. 52: 184–200.Google Scholar
Dickson, Vaughan, et Myatt., Tony 2002. «The Determinants of Provincial Minimum Wages in Canada». Journal of Labor Research 23: 57–67.Google Scholar
Dolado, Juan, Kramarz, Francis, Machin, Stephen, Manning, Alan, Margolis, David, Teulings, Coen, Saint-Paul, Gilles, et Keen., Michael 1996. « The Economic Impact of Minimum Wages in Europe ». Economic Policy 23: 317–372.Google Scholar
Döring, Holger, et Schwander, Hanna, 2015, «Revisiting the Left Cabinet Share: How to Measure the Partisan Profile of Governments in Welfare State Research». Journal of European Social Policy 25: 175–93.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1985. Politics against markets: The social democratic road to Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, David A. et Harrison., Kathryn 2006. «Races to the Bottom versus Races to the Middle: Minimum Wage Setting in Canada » dans Racing to the Bottom? Provincial Interdependence in the Canadian Federation, dir. Harrison, Kathryn. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Damian et Bosch., Gerhard 2013. «The Intersections between Minimum Wage and Collective Bargaining Institutions». Dans Minimum Wages, Pay Equity and Comparative Industrial Relations, dir. Grimshaw, Damien. New-York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Häusermann, Silja, Picot, Georg, et Geering., Dominik 2013. «Review Article: Rethinking Party Politics and the Welfare State–Recent Advances in the Literature». British Journal of Political Science 43: 221–240.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas. 1992. «Partisan Theory after Fifteen Years», European Journal of Political Economy 8: 361–373.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne et Stephens., John 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huo, Jingjing. 2009. Third Way Reforms: Social Democracy After the Golden Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Carsten. 2012. «Labour market- versus life course-related social policies: understanding cross-programme differences». Journal of European Public Policy 19 (2): 275–291.Google Scholar
Kau, James and Rubin, Paul. 1978. «Voting on Minimum Wages: A Time-Series Analysis», Journal of Political Economy 86: 337–42.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane. 2003. «Quantitative Indicators of Corporatism». International Journal of Sociology 33: 10–44.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 1983. The Democratic class struggle. Boston: Routledge Kegan and Paul.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter, et Palme., Joakim 2003. «New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–95», American Political Science Review 97: 425–446.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith et Rivers., Douglas 1988. «The Analysis of Committee Power: An Application to Senate Voting on the Minimum Wage», American Journal of Political Science 32: 1151–1174.Google Scholar
Leonard, Megan de Linde, Stanley, T. D. et Doucouliagos., Hristos 2014. «Does the UK Minimum Wage Reduce Employment? A Meta-Regression Analysis», British Journal of Industrial Relations 52 (3): 499–520.Google Scholar
Luckerson, Victor. 2015. «Here's Every City in America Getting a $15 Minimum Wage». TIME. <http://time.com/3969977/minimum-wage> (consulté le 15 juin 2017).+(consulté+le+15+juin+2017).>Google Scholar
Mabbett, Deborah. 2016. «The minimum wage in Germany: what brought the state in? ». Journal of European Public Policy 23: 1240–1258Google Scholar
Meyer, Brett. 2016. «Learning to Love the Government: Trade Unions and Late Adoption of the Minimum Wage». World Politics 68: 538–575.Google Scholar
Min-ho, Jung. 2017. «Minimum wage talks to begin next week». Korea Times. <http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2017/06/371230836._html> (consulté le 15 juin 2017).+(consulté+le+15+juin+2017).>Google Scholar
Molina, Oscar et Rhodes., Martin 2002. «Corporatism: the past, present and future of a concept». Annual Review of Political Science 5: 305–331.Google Scholar
Neumark, David, Ian Salas, J. M., et Wascher., William 2013. «Revisiting the minimum wage-employment debate: Throwing out the baby with the bathwater?», Discussion Paper Series, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, No. 7166, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn.Google Scholar
OCDE. 1998. Employment Outlook 32.Google Scholar
OCDE. 2016a. OECD Economic Outlook 99.Google Scholar
OCDE. 2016b. «Main Economic Indicators database». <http://www.oecd.org/std/oecdmaineconomicindicatorsmei.htm> (consulté le 6 mars 2017).+(consulté+le+6+mars+2017).>Google Scholar
OCDE. 2017. Minimum wages relative to average wage of full-time workers. <https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MIN2AVE> (consulté le 3 mars 2017).+(consulté+le+3+mars+2017).>Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2001. The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas, Rueda, David, et Way., Christopher R. 2002. « Comparative Political Economy of Wage Distribution: The Role of Partisanship and Labour Market Institutions ». British Journal of Political Science 32 (2): 281308.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James E. et Tipton., Elizabeth 2016. « Small sample methods for cluster-robust variance estimation and hypothesis testing in fixed effects models ». Journal of Business and Economic Statistics.Google Scholar
Rodionova, Zalta. 2017. «Labour and Tory pledge to increase National Minimum Wage could put low income jobs in danger, IFS warns». The Independent. <http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/labour-tory-national-minimum-wage-increase-general-election-2017-conservatives-low-income-jobs-a7729626.html> (consulté le 15 juin 2017).+(consulté+le+15+juin+2017).>Google Scholar
Rueda, David. 2008. «Left Government, Policy, and Corporatism: Explaining the Influence of Partisanship on Inequality». World Politics 60: 349–389.Google Scholar
Rueda, David, et Pontusson., Jonas 2000. « Wage Inequality and Varieties of Capitalism ». World Politics 52 (3): 35083.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G. 1996. «When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy». European Journal of Political Research 30: 155–183.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G. 2010. «Parties», dans The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, dir. Castles, F.G., Leibfried, S., Lewis, J., Obinger, H. et Pierson, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 211–26.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carina. 2016. «Panel Data Analysis and Partisan Variables. How Periodization Does Influence Partisan Effects», Journal of European Public Policy 23(10): 1442–59.Google Scholar
Seki, Katsunori et Williams, Laron K., 2014, «Seki-Williams Annual Government Partisanship». Harvard dataverse. <https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/0UNUAM> (consulté le 5 mars 2017).+(consulté+le+5+mars+2017).>Google Scholar
Stephens, John. 1979. The transition from Capitalism to Socialism. Londres: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stewart, Nadia, 2017, «How a $15 minimum wage could impact B.C.’s economy». Global news. <http://globalnews.ca/news/3494298/how-a-15-minimum-wage-could-impact-b-c-s-economy> (consulté le 15 juin 2017).+(consulté+le+15+juin+2017).>Google Scholar
Swank, Duane. 2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swank, Duane. 2013. «Party Government, Institutions, and Social Protection in the Age of Austerity», dans Staatstätigkeiten, Parteien und Demokratie. Festschrift für Manfred G. Schmidt, dir. Armingeon, K., Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 307–30.Google Scholar
Visser, Jelle. 2016. «ICTWSS Data base. version 5.1.» Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies (AIAS), <http://www.uva-aias.net/en/ictwss> (consulté le 5 mars 2017).+(consulté+le+5+mars+2017).>Google Scholar
Waltman, Jerold, et Pittman., Sarah 2002. «The Determinants of State Minimum Wage Rates: A Public Policy Approach», Journal of Labor Research 23: 51–56.Google Scholar
Wilson, Shaun. 2017. «The Politics of ‘Minimum Wage’ Welfare States: The Changing Significance of the Minimum Wage in the Liberal Welfare Regime». Social Policy & Administration 51: 244–264.Google Scholar