Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7tmb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T22:35:38.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Knocking Down Walls in Political Science: In Defense of an Expansionist Feminist Agenda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2017

Fiona MacDonald
Fiona MacDonald*
Affiliation:
University of the Fraser Valley
*
Department of Political Science, University of the Fraser Valley, 33844 King Road, Abbotsford BC, V2S 7M8, email: Fiona.macdonald@ufv.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article offers one possible answer to the question “What is the future of feminist political science?” by outlining and defending an expansionist agenda that is centred on challenging the male-female binary that has been upheld and replicated in the discipline to date. Such an approach draws heavily on the insights of intersectional analyses, transgender, queer and gender-fluid articulations of identity and requires that the field of political science investigate the varied and complex gendered experiences of “men.” Overall, this article argues that such as expansionist agenda is key to responding to the interrelated challenges presented by the perceived “crisis” of feminism and the ongoing “masculinity” of the discipline of political science.

Résumé

Cet article offre une réponse possible à la question « Quel est l'avenir de la science politique féministe? » en esquissant et en défendant un plan expansionniste axé sur la remise en cause du modèle binaire masculin-féminin qui s'est maintenu et a été reproduit dans la discipline jusqu’à ce jour. Une telle approche s'inspire largement des éclairages des analyses entrecroisées, de la fluidité identitaire transgenre, allosexuelle et de genre et exige que le domaine de la science politique examine les expériences genrées complexes et variées des « hommes ». Dans l'ensemble, cet article avance qu'un tel plan expansionniste est un élément clé de la réponse aux défis interreliés que présente la « crise » du féminisme perçue comme telle et la « masculinité » continue de la discipline de la science politique.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 50 , Special Issue 2: Finding Feminism , June 2017 , pp. 411 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aronson, Pamela. 2003. “Feminists or Postfeminists? Young Women's Attitudes toward Feminism and Gender Relations.” Gender & Society 17: 903–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashevkin, Sylvia. 1998. Opening Doors Wider: Women's Political Engagement in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 2011. Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brodie, Janine and Bakker, Isabella. 2007. “Canada's Social Policy Regime and Women: An Assessment of the Last Decade.” Ottawa: Status of Women Canada. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2007/swc-cfc/SW21-156-2007E.pdf (August 18, 2016).Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collier, Cheryl N. 2009. “Violence against Women or Violence against ‘People’? Neo-liberalism, ‘Post-neo-liberalism,’ and Anti-violence Policy in Ontario and British Columbia.” In Women and Public Policy in Canada, ed. Dobrowolsky, Alexandra. Don Mills ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cossman, Brendan, Bell, Shannon, Gotell, Lisa and Ross, Becki L.. 1997. Bad Attitude/s on Trial: Pornography, Feminism, and the Butler Decision. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Connell, Raewyn. 2012. “Transsexual Women and Feminist Thought: Toward New Understanding and New Politics.” Signs: Journal of Women and Culture in Society 37: 857–81.Google Scholar
Connell, Raewyn. 2005. Masculinities. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–99.Google Scholar
Dhamoon, Rita. 2009. Identity/Difference Politics: How Difference is Produced and Why it Matters. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Faludi, Susan. 2000. Stiffed: The Betrayal of the American Man. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Fernández Álvarez, Óscar. 2014. “Non-hegemonic Masculinity against Gender Violence.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 161: 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1997. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth. 2007. “Beyond the Gender Gap: Presidential Address to the Canadian Political Science Association Saskatoon, 2007.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40: 815–31.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2005. “Engendering Political Science: An Immodest Proposal.” Politics and Gender 1: 141–56.Google Scholar
Hebert, Laura A. 2007. “Taking the Difference Question Seriously: Feminisms and the Man Question.” Journal of Gender Studies 16: 31–45.Google Scholar
Holmgren, Egeberg Linn and Hearn, Jeff. 2009. “Framing ‘Men in Feminism’: Theoretical Locations, Local Contexts and Practical Passings in Men's Gender-Conscious Positionings on Gender Equality and Feminism.” Journal of Gender Studies 18: 403–18.Google Scholar
hooks, bell. 2014. Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irving, Dan and Raj, Rupert. 2014. “Introduction” in Transactivism in Canada: A Reader, ed. Irving, Dan and Raj, Rupert. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Jenson, Jane. 2009. “Writing Gender Out: The Continuing Effects of the Social Investment Perspective.” In Women and Public Policy in Canada, ed. Dobrowolsky, Alexandra. Don Mills ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kimmel, Michael. 2012. Manhood in America: A Cultural History. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 1998. “Gendering Research in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 1: 333–56.Google Scholar
Manning, Kimberley. 2016. “What Defines a Feminist University?” http://www.concordia.ca/content/shared/en/news/main/stories/2016/03/08/defining-the-feminist-university-kimberley-manning.html (March 8, 2016).Google Scholar
Murphy, Devon, 2013. “Feminist Movement's Future In Question after the Third Wave.” http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/06/24/modernfeminism_n_3471768.html (April 18, 2016).Google Scholar
Murray, Rainbow. 2015. “Too Much Presence? Men's Interests and Male Intersectionality.” http://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/116506c2-67f0-478e-a087-2f19c76d51af.pdf (June 2015).Google Scholar
Namaste, Viviane. 2000. Invisible Lives: The Erasure of Transsexual and Transgendered People. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Jacquetta and White, Linda A.. 2012. Women, Politics and Public Policy. 2nd ed. Don Mills ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Brenda, Gidengil, Elisabeth and Young, Lisa. 2008. “Examining Feminist Identification and Gender Related Attitudes.” Paper presented at the Canadian Political Science Association Meetings, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
Silverberg, Helene. 1990. “What Happened to the Feminist Revolution in Political Science? A Review Essay.” The Western Political Quarterly 43: 887–903.Google Scholar
UN Women. 2015. “Heforshe.” http://www.heforshe.org/en (August 18, 2016).Google Scholar
Vickers, Jill. 1997. Re-inventing Political Science: A Feminist Approach. Halifax: Fernwood Press.Google Scholar
Vickers, Jill. 2015. “Can We Change How Political Science Thinks? ‘Gender Mainstreaming’ in a Resistant Discipline: Presidential Address delivered to the Canadian Political Science Association, Ottawa, June 2, 2015.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 48: 747–70.Google Scholar
Watson, Emma. 2014. “Speech by UN Women Goodwill Ambassador Emma Watson at a special event for the HeForShe campaign.” United Nations Headquarters, New York. http://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2014/9/emma-watson-gender-equality-is-your-issue-too (September 20, 2014).Google Scholar
Watson, Emma and hooks, bell. 2016. “In Conversation.” http://www.papermag.com/emma-watson-bell-hooks-conversation-1609893784.html (March 1, 2016).Google Scholar
Waylen, Georgina, Celis, Karen, Kantola, Johanna and Laurel Weldon, S.. 2013. Oxford Handbook on Politics and Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
West, Isaac. 2013. Transforming Citizenships: Transgender Articulations of the Law. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar