Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:48:41.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Friends, Neighbours, Townspeople and Parties: Explaining Canadian Attitudes toward Muslims

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2018

Timothy B. Gravelle*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
*
School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia, email: [email protected]

Abstract

The 2015 Canadian federal election campaign put into focus relations between Muslim communities in Canada and wider Canadian society, featuring debates around banning the niqab, and a “barbaric cultural practices” hotline. At the same time, challenges in relations between Muslims and majority-group Canadians were not a new development in 2015: they had in the past faced periodic strains due to terrorism-related events, and attacks targeting Muslims in Canada. The Canadian case is in fact reflective of a challenge in intergroup relations facing several Western democracies. In light of this, what accounts for majority-group Canadians’ attitudes toward Muslims in Canada? Drawing on data from the 2011 and 2015 Canadian Election Studies and theories linking outgroup perceptions to intergroup contact (friends), local demographic context at both the micro-level (neighbours) and meso-level (townspeople), and political factors (parties), this article seeks to explain why majority-group Canadians hold alternately positive or negative views of Muslims.

Résumé

La campagne électorale fédérale canadienne de 2015 a attiré l'attention aux relations entre les communautés musulmanes du Canada et la société canadienne au sens large en raison des débats sur l'interdiction du niqab et la ligne d'aide sur les « pratiques culturelles barbares ». En même temps, des défis dans les relations entre les musulmans Canadiens et les Canadiens des groupes majoritaires n’étaient pas nouveaux en 2015. Des événements liés au terrorisme et des attaques visant des musulmans au Canada a autrefois soumis les relations à la pression. En fait, le cas canadien reflète un défi des relations intergroupes auxquelles sont confrontées plusieurs démocraties occidentales. Comment donc s'explique les attitudes des Canadiens des groupes majoritaires envers les musulmans au Canada? Utilisant les données de l’Étude électorale canadienne des années 2011 et 2015 et les théories concernant aux contacts intergroupes, les contextes démographiques locales au niveau micro et méso-urbain, et les facteurs politiques, cet article cherche à expliquer pourquoi les Canadiens tiennent les opinions alternativement positives ou négatives à l’égard des musulmans.

Type
Research Article/Étude originale
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Previous versions of this article were presented at the 2017 annual conferences of the American Association for Public Opinion Research in New Orleans, Louisiana, and the Canadian Political Science Association in Toronto, Ontario. Thanks are due to the participants of those two conferences, Carol Gravelle of Mount Saint Vincent University and the three anonymous CJPS reviewers for their helpful comments.

References

Abu-Rayya, Hisham Motkal and White, Fiona Ann. 2010. “Acculturation Orientations and Religious Identity as Predictors of Anglo-Australians’ Attitudes towards Australian Muslims.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 34 (6): 592–99.Google Scholar
Allison, Paul D. 2001. Missing Data. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Allport, Gordon W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Altareb, Belkeis Yahya. 1997. “Attitudes towards Muslims: Initial Scale Development.” Doctoral dissertation, Ball State University, Muncie Indiana.Google Scholar
Baybeck, Brady. 2008. “Sorting Out the Competing Effects of Racial Context.” Journal of Politics 68 (2): 386–96.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M. 1956. “Economic Discrimination and Negro Increase.” American Sociological Review 21 (5): 584–88.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M. 1957. “Per Cent Non-White and Discrimination in the South.” American Sociological Review 22 (6): 677–82.Google Scholar
Breton, Charles, Cutler, Fred, Lachance, Sarah, and Mierke-Zatwarnicki, Alex. 2017. “Telephone versus Online Survey Modes for Election Studies: Comparing Canadian Public Opinion and Vote Choice in the 2015 Federal Election.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 1005–36.Google Scholar
Chang, Linchiat and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2009. “National Surveys Via RDD Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet: Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73 (4): 641–78.Google Scholar
Clements, Ben. 2012. “The Sources of Public Feelings towards Religious Groups in Britain: The Role of Social Factors, Religious Characteristics, and Political Attitudes.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 27 (3): 419–31.Google Scholar
Cochrane, Christopher and Perrella, Andrea. 2012. “Regions, Regionalism and Regional Differences in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 829–53.Google Scholar
Cutler, Fred. 2007. “Context and Attitude Formation: Social Interaction, Default Information, or Local Interests?Political Geography 26 (5): 575600.Google Scholar
Dunaway, Johanna, Branton, Regina P. and Abrajano, Marisa A.. 2010. “Agenda Setting, Public Opinion, and the Issue of Immigration Reform.” Social Science Quarterly 91 (2): 359–78.Google Scholar
Enos, Ryan D. 2017. The Space Between Us: Social Geography and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Joel S. and Soper, J. Christopher. 2003. “The Roots of Public Attitudes toward State Accommodation of European Muslims’ Religious Practices before and after September 11.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42 (2): 247–58.Google Scholar
Forbes, H.D. 1997. Ethnic Conflict: Commerce, Culture, and the Contact Hypothesis. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, James M. 1994. “Back to the Black Belt: Racial Environment and White Racial Attitudes in the South.” Journal of Politics 56 (1): 2141.Google Scholar
Gravelle, Timothy B. 2016. “Party Identification, Contact, Contexts, and Public Attitudes toward Illegal Immigration.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (1): 125.Google Scholar
Gravelle, Timothy B. 2017. “Partisanship, Local Context, Group Threat, and Canadian Attitudes toward Immigration and Refugee Policy.” Migration Studies. doi:10.1093/migration/mnx058 (Nov. 2017).Google Scholar
GuimondSerge, P. Serge, P., Crisp, Richard J., Oliveira, Pierre De, Kamiejski, Rodolphe, Kteily, Nour, Kuepper, Beate, Lalonde, Richard N., Levin, Shana, Pratto, Felicia, Tougas, Francine, Sidanius, Jim and Zick, Andreas. 2013. “Diversity Policy, Social Dominance, and Intergroup Relations: Predicting Prejudice in Changing Social and Political Contexts.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 104 (6): 941–58.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, Gina, der Noll, Jolanda van and Sundberg, Ralph. 2016. “Opposing the Veil in the Name of Liberalism: Popular Attitudes to Liberalism and Muslim Veiling in the Netherlands.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 39 (10): 1719–37.Google Scholar
Ha, Shang E. 2008. “The Consequences of Multiracial Contexts on Public Attitudes toward Immigration.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (1): 2942.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens and Hopkins, Daniel J.. 2014. “Public Attitudes Toward Immigration.” Annual Review of Political Science 17 : 225–49.Google Scholar
Harell, Allison, Soroka, Stuart N., Iyengar, Shanto and Valentino, Nicholas A.. 2012. “The Impact of Economic and Cultural Cues on Support for Immigration in Canada and the United States.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 45 (3): 499530.Google Scholar
Helbling, Marc. 2014. “Opposing Muslims and the Muslim Headscarf in Western Europe.” European Sociological Review 30 (2): 242–57.Google Scholar
Hewstone, Miles and Schmid, Katharina. 2014. “Neighbourhood Ethnic Diversity and Orientations Toward Muslims in Britain: The Role of Intergroup Contact.” Political Quarterly 85 (3): 320–25.Google Scholar
Hood, M. V. and Morris, Irwin L.. 1997. “¿Amigo O Enemigo?: Context, Attitudes, and Anglo Public Opinion toward Immigration.” Social Science Quarterly 78 (2): 309–23.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J. 2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review 104 (1): 4060.Google Scholar
Jung, Jong Hyun. 2012. “Islamophobia? Religion, Contact with Muslims, and the Respect for Islam.” Review of Religious Research 54 (1): 113–26.Google Scholar
Kalkan, Kerem Ozan, Layman, Geoffrey C. and Uslaner, Eric M.. 2009. “‘Bands of Others’? Attitudes toward Muslims in Contemporary American Society.” Journal of Politics 71 (3): 847–62.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Eric. 2017. “Levels or Changes?: Ethnic Context, Immigration and the UK Independence Party Vote.” Electoral Studies 48: 5769.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Eric and Harris, Gareth. 2015. “‘White Flight’ or Positive Contact? Local Diversity and Attitudes to Immigration in Britain.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (12): 1563–90.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Lee, Sherman A., Reid, Chelsea, Short, Stephen and Campbell, Matthew. 2013. “Fear of Muslims: Psychometric Evaluation of the Islamophobia Scale.” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 5 (3): 157–71.Google Scholar
Lee, Sherman A., Gibbons, Jeffrey A., Thompson, John M. and Timani, Hussam S.. 2009. “The Islamophobia Scale: Instrument Development and Initial Validation.” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 19 (2): 92105.Google Scholar
Leuprecht, Christian and Winn, Conrad. 2011. What Do Muslim Canadians Want? The Clash of Interpretations and Opinion Research. Ottawa ON: Macdonald-Laurier Institute.Google Scholar
Little, Roderick J.A. and Rubin, Donald B.. 2002. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Merino, Stephen M. 2010. “Religious Diversity in a ‘Christian Nation’: The Effects of Theological Exclusivity and Interreligious Contact on the Acceptance of Religious Diversity.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 49 (2): 231–46.Google Scholar
Moore, Ryan T. and Reeves, Andrew. 2017. “Learning from Place in the Era of Geolocation.” In Analytics, Policy, and Governance, ed. Bachner, Jennifer, Ginsberg, Benjamin and Wagner Hill, Kathryn. New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 118–36.Google Scholar
Neuman, Keith. 2016. Survey of Muslims in Canada 2016. Toronto ON: Environics Institute for Survey Research.Google Scholar
Newman, Benjamin J., Hartman, Todd K. and Taber, Charles S.. 2012. “Foreign Language Exposure, Cultural Threat, and Opposition to Immigration.” Political Psychology 33 (5): 635–57.Google Scholar
Newman, Benjamin J. and Velez, Yamil. 2014. “Group Size versus Change? Assessing Americans’ Perception of Local Immigration.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (2): 293303.Google Scholar
Nisbet, Eric C., Ostman, Ronald and Shanahan, James. 2009. “Public Opinion toward Muslim Americans: Civil Liberties and the Role of Religiosity, Ideology, and Media Use.” In Muslims in Western Politics, ed. Sinno, Abdulkader H.. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Noël, Alain. 2014. “Studying Your Own Country: Social Scientific Knowledge for Our Times and Places.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 647–66.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Brenda, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Côté, Catherine and Young, Lisa. 2015. “Freedom of Religion, Women's Agency and Banning the Face Veil: The Role of Feminist Beliefs in Shaping Women's Opinion.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (11): 18861901.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. Eric and Mendelberg, Tali. 2000. “Reconsidering the Environmental Determinants of White Racial Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 574–89.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. Eric and Wong, Janelle. 2003. “Intergroup Prejudice in Multiethnic Settings.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 567.Google Scholar
Panagopoulos, Costas. 2006. “Arab and Muslim Americans and Islam in the Aftermath of 9/11.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70 (4): 608–24.Google Scholar
Penning, James M. 2009. “Americans’ Views of Muslims and Mormons: A Social Identity Theory Approach.” Politics and Religion 2 (2): 277302.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F. 1998. “Intergroup Contact Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology 49 : 6585.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F. and Tropp, Linda R.. 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (5): 751–83.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2007. “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (2): 137–74.Google Scholar
Raghunathan, Trivellore E. 2015. Missing Data Analysis in Practice. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Raghunathan, Trivellore E., Lepkowski, James M., Van Hoewyk, John and Solenberger, Peter. 2001. “A Multivariate Technique for Multiply Imputing Missing Values Using a Sequence of Regression Models.” Survey Methodology 27 (1): 8595.Google Scholar
Rey, Henri. 1996. La Peur Des Banlieues. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent. 2009. “Canadian National Security Policy and Canadian Muslim Communities.” In Muslims in Western Politics, ed. Sinno, Abdulkader H.. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rydgren, Jens and Ruth, Patrick. 2013. “Contextual Explanations of Radical Right-Wing Support in Sweden: Socioeconomic Marginalization, Group Threat, and the Halo Effect.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (4): 711–28.Google Scholar
Said, Edward W. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Sanders, David, Clarke, Harold D., Stewart, Marianne C. and Whiteley, Paul. 2007. “Does Mode Matter For Modeling Political Choice? Evidence From the 2005 British Election Study.” Political Analysis 15 (3): 257–85.Google Scholar
Savelkoul, Michael, Scheepers, Peer, Tolsma, Jochem and Hagendoorn, Louk. 2011. “Anti-Muslim Attitudes in the Netherlands: Tests of Contradictory Hypotheses Derived from Ethnic Competition Theory and Intergroup Contact Theory.” European Sociological Review 27 (6): 741–58.Google Scholar
Savelkoul, Michael, Scheepers, Peer, der Veld, William van, and Hagendoorn, Louk. 2012. “Comparing Levels of Anti-Muslim Attitudes across Western Countries.” Quality and Quantity 46 (5): 1617–24.Google Scholar
Schildkraut, Deborah J. 2002. “The More Things Change… American Identity and Mass and Elite Responses to 9/11.” Political Psychology 23 (3): 511–35.Google Scholar
Schneider, Silke L. 2008. “Anti-Immigrant Attitudes in Europe: Outgroup Size and Perceived Ethnic Threat.” European Sociological Review 24 (1): 5367.Google Scholar
Sides, John and Gross, Kimberly. 2013. “Stereotypes of Muslims and Support for the War on Terror.” Journal of Politics 75 (3): 583–98.Google Scholar
Stein, Robert M., Post, Stephanie Shirley and Rinden, Allison L.. 2000. “Reconciling Context and Contact Effects on Racial Attitudes.” Political Research Quarterly 53 (2): 285303.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Laura B. and Crête, Jean. 2010. “Studying Political Behavior: A Comparison of Internet and Telephone Surveys.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 23 (1): 2455.Google Scholar
Stolle, Dietlind and Harell, Allison. 2013. “Social Capital and Ethno-Racial Diversity: Learning to Trust in an Immigrant Society.” Political Studies 61 (1): 4266.Google Scholar
Strabac, Zan, Aalberg, Toril and Valenta, Marko. 2014. “Attitudes towards Muslim Immigrants: Evidence from Survey Experiments across Four Countries.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (1): 100–18.Google Scholar
Strabac, Zan and Listhaug, Ola. 2008. “Anti-Muslim Prejudice in Europe: A Multilevel Analysis of Survey Data from 30 Countries.” Social Science Research 37 (1): 268–86.Google Scholar
Van Der Noll, Jolanda, Poppe, Edwin and Verkuyten, Maykel. 2010. “Political Tolerance and Prejudice: Differential Reactions Toward Muslims in the Netherlands.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 32 (1): 4656.Google Scholar
Velasco González, Karina, Verkuyten, Maykel, Weesie, Jeroen and Poppe, Edwin. 2008. “Prejudice towards Muslims in The Netherlands: Testing Integrated Threat Theory.” British Journal of Social Psychology 47 (4): 667–85.Google Scholar
Weber, Hannes. 2015. “National and Regional Proportion of Immigrants and Perceived Threat of Immigration: A Three-Level Analysis in Western Europe.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 56 (2): 116–40.Google Scholar
Wike, Richard and Grim, Brian J.. 2010. “Western Views toward Muslims: Evidence from a 2006 Cross-National Survey.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 22 (1): 425.Google Scholar
Wilson, Thomas C. 1996. “Prejudice Reduction or Self-selection? A Test of the Contact Hypothesis.” Sociological Spectrum 16 (1): 4360.Google Scholar
Wright, Matthew, Johnston, Richard, Citrin, Jack and Soroka, Stuart. 2017. “Multiculturalism and Muslim Accommodation: Policy and Predisposition Across Three Political Contexts.” Comparative Political Studies 50 (1): 102–32.Google Scholar
Yeager, David S., Krosnick, Jon A., Chang, LinChiat, Javitz, Harold S., Levendusky, Matthew S., Simpser, Alberto and Wang, Rui. 2011. “Comparing the Accuracy of RDD Telephone Surveys and Internet Surveys Conducted with Probability and Non-Probability Samples.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (4): 709–47.Google Scholar
Zafar, Sadia and Ross, Erin C.. 2015. “Interreligious Contact, Attitudes, and Stereotypes: A Study of Five Religious Groups in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 47 (1): 3746.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Gravelle supplementary material

Appendix

Download Gravelle supplementary material(File)
File 46.7 KB