Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:27:17.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dog That Hasn't Barked: The Political Economy of Contemporary Debates on Canadian Foreign Investment Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2008

Geoffrey Hale
Geoffrey Hale*
Affiliation:
University of Lethbridge
*
Geoffrey Hale, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive West, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4, Canada, [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. This article examines the responses of Canadian business leaders, national newspapers, and governments to record numbers of foreign takeovers of Canadian-based firms in 2004–2007. It assesses the political, economic, financial market, and regulatory contexts for takeover activity in historical, macro-economic, and micro-economic contexts in light of Canada's historically firm-centred business culture. It summarizes five dimensions of policy and media discourse on the interrelated issues of foreign investment and corporate consolidation, including debates on “hollowing out” and “national champions.” It concludes that the limited influence of nationalist and related business interests on recent Canadian government policies reflects Canada's growing economic interdependence with other countries, particularly the growing role played by Canadian-based multinationals in foreign markets.

Résumé. Le présent article examine la réaction des leaders du monde des affaires canadien, des journaux nationaux et des gouvernements devant le nombre record de prises de contrôle étrangères de sociétés exerçant leur activités au Canada entre 2004 et 2007. Il évalue l'activité de prise de contrôle selon les données de la politique, de l'économie, des marchés financiers et de la réglementation, dans des contextes historique, macroéconomique et microéconomique, compte tenu de la culture des affaires canadienne, traditionnellement axée sur l'entreprise. Il présente un sommaire des cinq dimensions des politiques et du discours des médias sur des questions liées : l'investissement étranger et la consolidation des sociétés, dont le débat sur l'«évidement» et les «champions nationaux». Il conclut que le peu d'influence des intérêts commerciaux nationalistes ou apparentés sur les politiques récentes du gouvernement du Canada reflète l'interdépendance croissante entre le Canada et d'autres pays et, notamment, le rôle croissant sur les marchés étrangers des multinationales établies au Canada.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 719 - 747
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, Michael M. and Coleman, William D.. 1989. The State, Business and Industrial Change in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, John R. and Gellatly, Guy. 2005. Global Links: Long-Term Trends in Foreign Investment and Foreign Control in Canada: 1960–2005. Cat. #11-622-MIE, no. 008. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Baldwin, John R. and Gu, Wulong. 2005. Multinationals, Foreign Ownership and Productivity Growth in Canada. Cat. #11-622, #9. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Baldwin, John R. and Hanel, Peter. 2000. “Multinationals and the Canadian Innovation Process.” Working Paper #151. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Angela. 2007. “Brazil exchange hits big time.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), June 7.Google Scholar
Beckstead, Desmond and Brown, W. Mark. 2006. Head Office Employment in Canada: 1999—2005. Cat. #11-624-MIE #014. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Bradford, Neil. 1998. Commissioning Ideas. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canada. Advisory Panel on Efficiencies. 2005. “Treatment of efficiencies under the Competition Act: History and current practice.” Report. Ottawa: Competition Bureau. http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/PDFs/FinalPanelReportEfficiencies_e.pdf.Google Scholar
Canada. Department of Finance. 2006. Fiscal Reference Tables. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada. Department of Finance. 2007. The Budget Plan: 2007. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada. Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada. 1985. Report. 3 vol.Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade. 2002. Partners in North America: Advancing Canada's Relations with the United States and Mexico. 3rd report. 37th Parliament, 2nd Session. Ottawa: House of Commons.Google Scholar
Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE). 2007. “Competitive Offence is Best Defence against Hollowing Out, Business Leaders Say.” Press release. Ottawa, October 10.Google Scholar
Carmichael, Kevin. 2008. “Prentice defends decision to kill takeover.” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), May 9.Google Scholar
Chase, Steven. 2007a. “Trust tax under fire as drain on revenue.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), April 9.Google Scholar
Chase, Steven. 2007b. “Liberals aim to reduce foreign takeovers.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), May 28.Google Scholar
Chernow, Ron. 1990. The House of Morgan. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, Peter. 2004. Micropolitics and Canadian Business: Paper, Steel, and the Airlines. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Campbell. 2008. “The death knell of a deal.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), April 12.Google Scholar
Competition Bureau. 2006. “Proposed Acquisition of Arcelor by Mittal.” Ottawa. http://www.competition.bureau.ca/internet/index.cfm?ItemID=2224&1g=eGoogle Scholar
Competition Policy Review Panel. 2007. Sharpening Canada's Competitive Edge. Ottawa: Industry Canada.Google Scholar
Competition Policy Review Panel. 2008. Compete to Win—Final Report. Ottawa: Industry Canada.Google Scholar
Crane, David. 2007. “Why we should worry about the economy.” The Toronto Star, 5 November.Google Scholar
D'Alessandro, Dominic. 2007. “Ownership rules for other sectors?” National Post. (Toronto), May 4, FP15.Google Scholar
DeCloet, Derek. 2007. “Protectionism isn't the cure for the hollowing out of Corporate Canada.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), May 5, B2.Google Scholar
Estey, Willard Z. 1999. “The quiet hijacking of corporate Canada.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), December 16.Google Scholar
Financial Post Crosbie. 2004–2008. M&A Quarterly Reports. http://www.crosbieco.com/ma/index.htm (June 26, 2008).Google Scholar
Foster, Peter. 2007. “Champions are fat, slow, political.” National Post (Toronto), May 26, FP19.Google Scholar
Foster, Peter. 2008. “A model of naive interventionism.” National Post (Toronto), June 27, A1.Google Scholar
Gellatly, G., Sabourin, D. and Baldwin, J.. 2006. “Changes in Foreign Control under Different Regulatory Climates: Multinationals in Canada.” Canadian Economic Observer. Cat. #11-010. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Gera, Surendra, Gu, Wulong and Lee, Frank C.. 1999. Foreign Direct Investment and Productivity Growth: The Canadian Host-Country Experience. Working Paper #30. Ottawa: Industry Canada.Google Scholar
Go, Erwin. 2007. Year 2006 in Review. Toronto: Investment Funds Institute of Canada. http://www.ific.ca/eng/frames.asp?l1=Statistics (October 2, 2007).Google Scholar
Guillemette, Yvan and Mintz, Jack M.. 2004. A Capital Story: Exploding the Myths around Foreign Investment in Canada. Commentary #201. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.Google Scholar
Hale, Geoffrey. 2006. Uneasy Partnership: The Politics of Business and Government. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Richard G., ed. 2003. North American Linkages: Opportunities and Challenges for Canada. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Michael. 2002. A Nation of Traders. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Haskayne, Dick, with Grescoe, Paul. 2007. Northern Tigers: Building Ethical Canadian Corporate Champions. Toronto: Key Porter.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Andy. 2007. “As rivals merge, Alcan wants to go it alone.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), March 14.Google Scholar
Hurtig, Mel. 2002. The Vanishing Country: Is It Too Late to Save Canada? Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Hutton, Susan M. 2007. “Canada and the EU: Cooperation and Convergence.” The European Antitrust Review 2007. http://www.stikeman.com/en/pdf/EU_Canada-Sept2007-Hutton.pdfGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Greg. 2007. “Ipsco swept up in tide of consolidation.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), July 17.Google Scholar
Lavoie, Francois. 2003. Canadian Direct Investment in Offshore Financial Centres, Cat. #11-621, #021. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
MacIntosh, Jeffrey. 2008. “The People's corporate law: Unsafe at any speed.” National Post (Toronto), June 10, FP17.Google Scholar
Mandel-Campbell, Andrea. 2007. Why Canadians Don't Drink Molson's: Rescuing Canadian Business from the Suds of Global Obscurity. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre.Google Scholar
Marotte, Bertrand. 2007. “Beaudoin joins call for takeover protection.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), May 30, B1.Google Scholar
Martin, Roger and Nixon, Gordon. 2007. “Whoa Canada.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), July 2, B1.Google Scholar
McCallum, John. 2007. “Level field for takeovers.” National Post (Toronto), June 5, FP15.Google Scholar
McLean, Catherine. 2007. “Scrap foreign ownership limits, OECD study urges.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), Feb. 14.Google Scholar
Milne, David. 1986. Tug of War: Trudeau, Mulroney and the Provinces. Toronto: Lorimer.Google Scholar
Morgan, Gwyn. 2007. “Head offices can locate anywhere, so make Canada competitive.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), May 14, B2.Google Scholar
Partridge, John. 2007. “Foreign takeover fears played down.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), August 22.Google Scholar
Pitts, Gordon et al. 2006. “Hollow Fears? For Sale: Corporate Canada.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), September 9–18.Google Scholar
Prentice, Hon. Jim. 2007. “Speaking points to Vancouver Board of Trade, October 9, 2007.” Ottawa: Industry Canada.Google Scholar
Prentice, Hon. Jim. 2008. “Ottawa must control own technology.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), April 12, A17.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Stéphane. 2008. “A case to be heard.” National Post (Toronto), May 30, FP15.Google Scholar
Rubin, Jeff, Buchanan, Peter and Shenfeld, Avery. 2007. “A Merger-Driven Market.” Toronto: CIBC World Markets. http://research.cibcwm.com/economic_public/download/mimay07.pdf (May 17, 2007).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Gerald. 2007. “Ottawa should step up for the home team.” The Globe and Mail, May 14, B2.Google Scholar
Silcoff, Sean. 2007. “A speed bump in the big steel era.” National Post (Toronto), June 2, FP6.Google Scholar
Silcoff, Sean. 2008. “Xenophobia to blame if deal dies.” National Post (Toronto), May 9, FP3.Google Scholar
Simeon, Richard and Robinson, Ian. 1990. State, Society and the Development of Canadian Federalism. Background Paper. Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Smythe, Elizabeth. 2007. “Canada and the Negotiation over Investment Rules at the WTO.” In Readings in Canadian Foreign Policy: Classic Debates and New Ideas, ed. Bratt, Duane and Kukucha, Christopher J.. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2001, 2008. Canada's International Investment Position. Cat. #67-202. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2006. Canada's International Investment Position. Cat. #67-202. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2007a. “Employer pension plans (trusteed pension plans).” The Daily (Ottawa), March 15.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2007b. “Foreign control in the Canadian economy: 2005.” The Daily (Ottawa), June 14.Google Scholar
Stueck, Wendy. 2008. “Veto leaves MDA stuck with unwanted division.” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), April 11, B1.Google Scholar
Supreme Court of Canada. 2008. “BCE Inc. et al. v. A Group of 1976 Debentureholders, et al.—and—Director Appointed Pursuant to the CBCA, Catalyst Asset Management Inc. and Matthew Stuart.” National Post online, June 20.Google Scholar
Tait, Carrie. 2007. “Buyers get more aggressive.” Financial Post, 16 May.Google Scholar
Tang, Jianmin and Rao, Someshwar. 2001. R&D Propensity and R&D Performance of Foreign Controlled Firms in Canada. Working Paper #33. Ottawa: Industry Canada.Google Scholar
Thorpe, Jacqueline. 2008. “What business wants.” National Post (Toronto), June 23, FP3.Google Scholar
Verbeke, Alain, Huebner, Jefferson and Yuan, Wenlong. 2006. The NAFTA Effect: Multinational Enterprises in Canada. Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada.Google Scholar
Vieira, Paul. 2007a. “No market meddling, PM vows.” National Post (Toronto), June 2, FP7.Google Scholar
Vieira, Paul. 2007b. “Panel to eye competition, ownership.” National Post (Toronto), July 13, FP2.Google Scholar
Waverman, Leonard, ed. 1991. Corporate Globalization through Mergers and Acquisitions. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Wells, Jennifer. 2007. “PM fiddles while Alcan sale looms.” Toronto Star, May 30.Google Scholar
Whittington, Les. 1999. The Banks. Toronto: Stoddart.Google Scholar
Whittington, Les and Brennan, Richard. 2008. “Massive overhaul urged on foreign investment.” Toronto Star, June 27.Google Scholar
Willis, Andrew. 2007. “Savvy acquirers like to strike while the iron is cold.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), Sept. 7.Google Scholar