Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:41:00.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Démocratie délibérative et sécession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2005

Stéphane Courtois
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

Abstract

Résumé. L'auteur entend défendre dans cet essai une conception de la sécession qu'il appelle délibérative et la justifier par rapport à d'autres théories concurrentes de la sécession. En l'absence d'un encadrement juridique clair et rigoureux des cas de sécession, de plus en plus nombreux, qui échappent aux situations de domination coloniale prévues par le droit international, la question se pose en effet de savoir s'il n'existe pas d'autres moyens de les résoudre dans des conditions pacifiques. L'auteur soutient que la démocratie délibérative pourrait offrir de tels moyens. Le but de l'article est d'examiner dans quelles conditions et à l'intérieur de quelles limites.

Abstract. In this article, the author aims at supporting a deliberative conception of secession and at justifying it against other rival theories. In the absence of clear and rigorous legal regulations of more and more numerous cases of secession going beyond the situations of colonial domination already covered by the international law, the question arises as to whether other means for their pacific solution are available. The author contends that deliberative democracy could provide such a means and examines in what conditions and within what limits this could be achieved.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ouvrages de référence

Anaya, S. James. 1995. “The Capacity of International Law to Advance Ethnic or Nationality Claims”. Dans The Rights of Minority Cultures, dir. Will Kymlicka. Oxford : Oxford University Press : 321330.
Bauböck, Rainer. 2000. “Why Stay Together? A Pluralist Approach to Secession and Federation”. Dans Citizenship in Diverse Societies, dir. Will Kymlicka & Wayne Norman. Oxford : Oxford University Press : 366394.
Beran, H. 1984. “A Liberal Theory of Secession”. Political Studies 32 : 2131.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. 1998a. “Democracy and Secession”. Dans National Self-Determination and Secession, dir. Margaret Moore : 1433.
Buchanan, Allen. 1998b. “What's So Special About Nations?”. Dans Rethinking Nationalism, dir. J. Couture Kai Nielsen & M. Seymour. Calgary : University of Calgary Press : 283309.
Buchanan, Allen. 1997a. “Self-Determination, Secession and the Rule of Law”. Dans The Morality of Nationalism, dir. Robert McKim & Jeff McMaham. Oxford : Oxford University Press : 301323.
Buchanan, Allen. 1997b. “Theories of Secession”. Philosophy and Public Affairs 26/1 : 3061.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. 1991. Secession : The Morality of Political Divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Boulder, Colorado : Westview Press.
Cassese, Antonio. 1981. “The Self-Determination of Peoples”. Dans The International Bill of Rights. The Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, dir. Louis Henkin. New York : Columbia University Press : 93113.
Cohen, Joshua. 1997. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy”. Dans Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics, dir. J. Bohman & W. Rehg. Cambridge : MIT Press : 6791.
Cohen, Joshua. 1986. “An Epistemic Conception of Democracy”. Ethics 97 : 2638.Google Scholar
Copp, D. 1997. “Democracy and Communal Self-Determination”. Dans The Morality of Nationalism, dir. Robert McKim & Jeff McMaham. Oxford : Oxford University Press : 277300.
Estlund, David. 1997. “The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority”. The Modern Schoolman 74 / 4 : 259276.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1994. “Breaking Up : An Essay on Secession”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24 : 357372.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. 1991. Liberal Purposes : Goods, Virtues and Diversity in the Liberal State. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Gutmann, Amy. 2003. Identity and Democracy. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
Gutmann, Amy, & D. Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge : The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998a. L'intégration républicaine. Paris : Fayard.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998b. Die postnationale Konstellation. Politische Essays. Frankfurt : Suhrkamp. (Trad. franç. partielle : Après l'État-nation. Paris : Fayard, 2000).
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998c. “Reply to Symposium Participants, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law”. Dans Habermas on Law and Democracy : Critical Exchanges, dir. M. Rosenfeld & A. Arato. California : University of California Press : 381452.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1997. Droit et démocratie. Entre faits et normes. Paris : Gallimard.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. De l'éthique de la discussion. Paris : Les Éditions du Cerf.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. “Conscience historique et identité posttraditionnelle”. Dans J. Habermas, Écrits politiques. Culture, droit et histoire. Paris : Les Éditions du Cerf.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1986. “Notes programmatiques pour fonder en raison une éthique de la discussion”. Dans J. Habermas, Morale et communication. Paris : Les Éditions du Cerf : 63130.
Hannum, Hurst, dir. 1993. Basic Documents on Autonomy and Minority Rights. Boston : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Hannum, Hurst 1989. “The Limits of Sovereignty and Majority Rule : Minorities, Indigenous Peoples, and the Right to Autonomy”. Dans New Directions in Human Rights, dir. Ellen L. Lutz Hurst Hannum & Kathryn J. Burke. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press : 324.
Keating, Michael. 2001. “Nations Without States : The Accommodation of Nationalism in the New State Order”. Dans Minority Nationalism and the Changing International Order, dir. M. Keating & J. McGarry. Oxford : Oxford University Press : 1943.CrossRef
Knight, Jack. 1999. “Constitutionalism and Deliberative Democracy”. Dans Deliberative Politics. Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, dir. Stephen Macedo. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, Will. 2001. Politics in the Vernacular : Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship : A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Macedo, Stephen. 1990. Liberal Virtues : Citizenship, Virtue and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism. Oxford : Clarendon Press.
Margalit, A., & J. Raz. 1990. “National Self-Determination”. Journal of Philosophy 87 : 439461.Google Scholar
McGarry, John. 1998. “Orphans of Secession : National Pluralism in Secessionist Regions and Post-Secession States”. Dans National Self-Determination and Secession, dir. Margaret Moore : 215232.
Miller, David. 1995. On Nationality. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Moore, Margaret, dir. 1998. National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Moore, Margaret 1997. “On National Self-Determination”. Political Studies 45/5 : 900913.Google Scholar
Norman, Wayne. 1998. “The Ethics of Secession as the Regulation of Secessionist Politics”. Dans National Self-Determination and Secession, dir. Margaret Moore : 3461.
Norman, Wayne. 1994. “Towards a Philosophy of Federalism”. Dans Group Rights, dir. Judith Baker. Toronto : University of Toronto Press : 79100.
Philpott, Daniel. 1998. “Self-Determination in Practice”. Dans National Self-Determination and Secession, dir. Margaret Moore : 79102.
Philpott, Daniel. 1995. “In Defense of Self-Determination”. Ethics 105/2 : 352385.Google Scholar
Rehg, William. 1997. “Legitimacy and Deliberation in Epistemic Conceptions of Democracy : Between Habermas and Estlund”. The Modern Schoolman 74 / 4 : 355374.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 1991. “Constitutionalism and Secession”. The University of Chicago Law Review 58/2 : 633670.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 1995. Strange Multiplicity : Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Weinstock, Daniel. 2001. “Constitutionalizing the Right to Secede”. The Journal of Political Philosophy 9/2 : 182203.Google Scholar
Weinstock, Daniel. 2000. “Toward a Proceduralist Theory of Secession”. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 13/2 : 251262.Google Scholar