Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:50:46.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mediated Horserace: Campaign Polls and Poll Reporting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2012

J. Scott Matthews ,
Mark Pickup  and
Fred Cutler
J. Scott Matthews*
Affiliation:
Queen's University
Mark Pickup*
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Fred Cutler*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
*
J. Scott Matthews (corresponding author), Queen's University, Room C429, Mackintosh-Corry Hall, Kingston ON, Canada, K7L 3N6[email protected]
Mark Pickup, University of Nottingham, Room C17 Law and Social Sciences, University Park, NottinghamUK, NG7 2RD, [email protected]
Fred Cutler, University of British Columbia, C408 – 1866 Main Mall, Vancouver BC, Canada, V6T 1Z1, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. Although “horserace journalism” is thought to be central to contemporary election news coverage and has generated a great deal of criticism, there is no general model of the nature and dynamics of horserace journalism or “poll reporting.” This paper proposes and empirically evaluates such a model. The model builds on and extends John Zaller's “theory of media politics” to consider specifically what citizens demand from polls and what journalists supply. Aside from the generic motivations of politicians, citizens and journalists, the model emphasizes the unique features of polls as objects of news coverage. The paper finds considerable support for the model in an analysis of newspaper coverage of horserace polls (that is, vote intention polls) in the Canadian general election of 2006. Our findings from this one case have potentially broad implications for our understanding of the relationship between polls and electoral democracy both empirically and normatively.

Résumé. Même si le journalisme de course (“horserace journalism”) est vu comme étant une composante centrale de la couverture électorale et qu'il a généré sa part de critiques, il n'existe pas de modèle général de la nature et de la dynamique de ce type de journalisme. Cet article propose, et évalue empiriquement, un tel modèle. Prenant comme point de départ la « Theory of Media Politics » de John Zaller, ce modèle considère plus spécifiquement ce que les citoyens demandent des sondages et ce que les journalistes leurs procurent. Au-delà des motivations génériques des politiciens, citoyens et journalistes, le modèle met l'accent sur les caractéristiques uniques des sondages en tant qu'objet de couverture journalistique. L'article présente des résultats supportant considérablement le modèle à travers une analyse de la couverture des sondages par les journaux (c'est-à-dire des sondages sur les intentions de vote) durant l'élection générale canadienne de 2006. Nos résultats émanant de ce cas ont potentiellement des implications beaucoup plus grandes pour notre compréhension de la relation entre les sondages et la démocratie électorale, à la fois sur le plan empirique et sur le plan normatif.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 261 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansolabehere, Stephen and Iyengar, Shanto. 1994. “Of Horseshoes and Horse Races: Experimental Studies of the Impact of Poll Results on Electoral Behavior.” Political Communication 11 (4): 413–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, Andre, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Nadeau, Richard and Nevitte, Neil. 2002. Anatomy of a Liberal Victory: Making Sense of the Vote in the 2000 Canadian Election. Peterborough ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Blais, Andre, Gidengil, Elisabeth and Nevitte, Neil. 2006. “Do Polls Influence the Vote?” In Capturing Campaign Effects, ed. Brady, Henry E. and Johnston, Richard. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Burden, Barry and Hillygus, D. Sunshine. 2009. “Polls and Elections: Opinion Formation, Polarization, and Presidential Reelection.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39 (3): 619–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Newspaper Association. 2008. 2007 Daily Newspaper Paid Circulation Data. http://www.cna-acj.ca/en/aboutnewspapers/circulation (May 12, 2009).Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis and Druckman, James N.. 2007. “Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies.” American Political Science Review 101 (4): 637–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespi, I. 1980. “Polls as Journalism.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 44 (4): 462–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In Handbook of Political Science: Strategies of Inquiry, ed. Greenstein, Fred and Polsby, Nelson. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Peter A. and De Clercy, Cristine. 2005. “Regulatory Compliance in Opinion Poll Reporting during the 2004 Canadian Election.” Canadian Public Policy 31 (3): 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankovic, K. A. 2005. “Reporting ‘the Polls’ in 2004.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (5): 682–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geer, John. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew and King, Gary. 1993. “Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?” British Journal of Political Science 23: 409–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth, Maioni, Antonia and Soroka, Stuart. 2004. “The Role of the Media: A Campaign Saved by a Horserace.” Policy Options 87: 86–91.Google Scholar
Hayes, Danny and Guardino, Matt. 2010. “Whose Views Made the News? Media Coverage and the March to War in Iraq.” Political Communication 27 (1): 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew and Malhotra, Neil. 2009. “Myopic Voters and Natural Disaster Policy.” American Political Science Review 103 (3): 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto and Kinder, Donald. 1987. News that Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Norpoth, Helmut and Hahn, Kyu. 2004. “Consumer demand for election news: The horserace sells.” Journal of Politics 66 (1): 157–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Richard, Blais, Andre, Brady, Henry E. and Crete, Jean. 1992. Letting the People Decide. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, Patrick J. and Rice, Tom W.. 1994. “The Psychology of Political Momentum.” Political Research Quarterly 47 (4): 923–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Stephanie G. 1999. “Public Opinion in Television Election News: Beyond Polls.” Political Communication 16 (2): 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Matthews, J. Scott. 2010. “Enlightenment, Equalization or What? Campaigns, Learning and the Economy in Canadian Elections.” In Voting Behaviour in Canada, ed. Anderson, Cameron and Stephenson, Laura. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
McCombs, Maxwell and Shaw, Donald. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of the Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (2): 176–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, Cyrus and Patel, Nitin. 1995. “Exact Logistic Regression: Theory and Examples.” Statistics in Medicine 14: 2143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 1998. Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E. 2005. “Of Polls, Mountains: US Journalists and Their Use of Election Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (5): 716–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pederson, Mogens N. 1983. “Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility in European Party Systems 1948–1977.” In Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, ed. Daalder, Hans and Mair, Peter. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Pickup, Mark. 2010. “Campaign Election Polls and Democracy in Canada.” In Perspectives on the Canadian Voter: Puzzles of Influence and Choice, ed. Stephenson, Laura and Anderson, Cameron. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Pickup, Mark and Johnston, Richard. 2007. “Campaign Trial Heats as Electoral Information: Evidence from the 2004 and 2006 Canadian Federal Elections.” Electoral Studies 26 (2): 460–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickup, Mark and Johnston, Richard. 2008. “Campaign Trial Heats as Election Forecasts: Measurement Error and Bias in 2004 Presidential Campaign Polls.” International Journal of Forecasting 24 (2): 272–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosensteil, Tom. 2005. “Political Polling and the New Media Culture: A Case of More Being Less.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (5): 716–24.Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael. 2002. “The Newsmedia As Political Institutions.” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 249–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, Stuart. 2002. Agenda-setting Dynamics in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2003. “Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.” Journal of Statistical Software 8 (1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimble, Linda and Sampert, Shannon. 2004. “Who's in the Game? The Framing of Election 2000 by the Globe and Mail and the National Post.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1998. “The Rule of Product Substitution in Presidential Campaign News.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 560 (1): 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1999. A Theory of Media Politics. Unpublished manuscript, UCLA.Google Scholar