Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:22:59.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Social Media Transforming Canadian Electioneering? Hybridity and Online Partisan Strategies in the 2012 Quebec Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2019

Thierry Giasson ,
Gildas Le Bars  and
Philippe Dubois
Thierry Giasson*
Affiliation:
Département de science politique, Université Laval 1030, avenue des Sciences-Humaines Québec, QC G1V0A6
Gildas Le Bars
Affiliation:
Groupe de recherche en communication politique, Université Laval 1030, avenue des Sciences-Humaines Québec, QC G1V0A6
Philippe Dubois
Affiliation:
Département de science politique, Université Laval 1030, avenue des Sciences-Humaines Québec, QC G1V0A6
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article investigates the extent to which provincial political parties made use of social media in their strategy, organization and communication in order to achieve their electoral goals during the Quebec 2012 general election. Using data from a series of 19 interviews conducted with online strategists and campaign directors from the five leading parties active in the 2012 election, we identify the strategic objectives these organizations followed when developing their social media campaigns. The strategists' narratives reveal that social media became a central component of electioneering and that parties were carrying out, in various forms, hybrid campaigns that combined traditional and emergent communication technologies and employed both old and new types of organizational principles.

Résumé

Cet article examine dans quelle mesure les partis politiques provinciaux ont inclus les médias sociaux dans leur stratégie, l'organisation et la communication de campagne pour atteindre leurs objectifs lors des élections générales de 2012 au Québec. À l'aide des données provenant d'une série de 19 entrevues menées auprès de stratèges et de directeurs de campagne des cinq principaux partis lors de l'élection de 2012, nous relevons les objectifs stratégiques poursuivis par ces derniers dans l'élaboration de leurs campagnes numériques. Les propos des stratèges révèlent que les médias sociaux sont devenus un élément central de l'organisation électorale et que les partis menaient, sous diverses formes, des campagnes hybrides dans lesquelles les technologies de communication traditionnelles et émergentes ainsi que d'anciens et de nouveaux types de principes organisationnels étaient combinés.

Keywords

Politique en ligneQuébecStratégiesÉlectionsMédias socionumériquesHybriditéOnline politicsQuebecStrategiesElectionsSocial MediaHybridization
Type
Research Article/Étude originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 323 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auter, Zachary J. and Fine, Jeffrey A.. 2018. “Social Media Campaigning: Mobilization and Fundraising on Facebook.” Social Science Quarterly 99 (1): 185–200.Google Scholar
Bor, Stephanie E. 2013. “Using Social Networking Sites to Improve Communication Between Political Campaigns and Citizens in the 2012 Election.” American Behavioral Scientist 58 (9): 1195–213.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Andrew. 2017. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Peter John. 2010. “Adoption and Use of Digital Media in Election Campaigns: Australia, Canada and New Zealand.” Public Communication Review 1 (1): 3–26.Google Scholar
Delacourt, Susan. 2016. Shopping for Votes: How Politicians Choose Us and We Choose Them 2nd ed. Madeira Park BC: Douglas & McIntyre.Google Scholar
Enli, Gunn and Moe, Hallvard. 2013. “Social Media and Elections: Key Tendencies and Ways Forward .” Information, Communication and Society 16 (5): 637–45.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Thomas. 2010. “Campaign Strategy: Triage and the Concentration of Resources.” In Election, ed. MacIvor, Heather. Toronto: Emond Montgomery Publications.Google Scholar
Giasson, Thierry and Dubois, Philippe. 2018. “Juste part, boycott et loi spéciale. Le cadrage gouvernemental d'un printemps de crise sociale.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, Online First View, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423918000513Google Scholar
Giasson, Thierry, Greffet, Fabienne and Chacon, Geneviève. 2018. “Relever le défi de l'hybridité: Les objectifs des stratégies de campagnes numériques lors des élections française et québécoise de 2012.” Politique et Sociétés 37 (2): 19–46.Google Scholar
Gibson, Rachel K. 2013. “Party Change, Social Media and the Rise of ‘Citizen-Initiated Campaigning’.” Party Politics 21 (2): 183–97.Google Scholar
Gibson, Rachel K., Römmele, Andrea and Williamson, Andy. 2014. “Chasing the Digital Wave: International Perspectives on the Growth of Online Campaigning.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics 11 (2): 123–29.Google Scholar
Jackson, Nigel and Lilleker, Darren. 2009. “Building and Architecture of Participation? Political Parties and Web 2.0 in Britain.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics 6 (3–4): 232–50.Google Scholar
Karlsen, Rune. 2009. “Campaign Communication and the Internet: Party Strategy in the 2005 Norwegian Election Campaign.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 19 (2): 183–202.Google Scholar
Karpf, David. 2012. The MoveOn Effect: The Unexpected Transformation of American Political Advocacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karpf, David, Kreiss, Daniel, Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis and Powers, Matthew. 2015. “The Role of Qualitative Methods in Political Communication Research: Past, Present, and Future.” International Journal of Communication 9 (1): 1888–1906.Google Scholar
Kreiss, Daniel. 2012. Taking Our Country Back: The Crafting of Networked Politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lilleker, Darren G. and Jackson, Nigel A.. 2013. “Reaching Inward Not Outward: Marketing via Internet at the UK 2010 General Election.” Journal of Political Marketing 12 (2): 244–61.Google Scholar
McKelvey, Fenwick and Piebiak, Jill. 2016. “Porting the Political Campaign: The NationBuilder Platform and the Global Flows of Political Technology.” New Media & Society 20 (3): 901–18.Google Scholar
Marland, Alex, Giasson, Thierry and Lees-Marshment, Jennifer. 2012. Political Communication in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Marland, Alex, Giasson, Thierry and Small, Tamara A.. 2014. Political Communication in Canada: Meet the Press and Tweet the Rest. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Rasmus K. 2012. Ground Wars: Personalized Communication in Political Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Penney, Joel. 2017a. “Social Media and Citizen Participation in ‘Official’ and ‘Unofficial’ Electoral Promotion: A Structural Analysis of the 2016 Bernie Sanders Digital Campaign.” Journal of Communication 67 (3): 402–23.Google Scholar
Penney, Joel. 2017b. The Citizen Marketer: Promoting Political Opinion in the Social Media Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raynauld, Vincent, Lalancette, Mireille and Tourigny-Koné, Sofia. 2016. “Political Protest 2.0: Social Media and the 2012 Student Strike in the Province of Quebec, Canada.” French Politics 14 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Small, Tamara A. 2008. “The Facebook Effect? On-line Campaigning in the 2008 Canadian and US Elections.” Policy Options 14 (1): 51–70.Google Scholar
Small, Tamara A. 2009. “Regulating Canadian Elections in the Digital Age: Approaches and Concerns.” Election Law Journal 8 (3): 189–205.Google Scholar
Small, Tamara A. 2010. “Canadian Politics in 140 Characters: Party Politics in the Twitterverse.” Canadian Parliamentary Review 33 (3): 39–45.Google Scholar
Small, Tamara A. 2012. “Are We Friends Yet? Online Relationship Marketing by Political Parties.” In Political Marketing in Canada, ed. Marland, Alex, Giasson, Thierry and Lees-Marshment, Jennifer. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Small, Tamara A. 2014. “The Not-So Social Network: The Use of Twitter by Canada's Party Leaders.” In Political Communication in Canada: Meet the Press and Tweet the Rest, ed. Marland, Alex, Giasson, Thierry and Small, Tamara A.. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Small, Tamara A., Giasson, Thierry and Marland, Alex. 2014. “The Triangulation of Canadian Political Communication.” In Political Communication in Canada: Meet the Press and Tweet the Rest, ed. Marland, Alex, Giasson, Thierry and Small, Tamara A.. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Katherine V. R. and Bélanger, Pierre C.. 2016. “La cyberdémocratie québécoise: Twitter bashing, #VoteCampus et selfies.” Politique et Sociétés 25 (2–3): 239–358.Google Scholar
Vaccari, Cristian. 2010. “Technology Is a Commodity: The Internet in the 2008 United States Presidential Election.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics 7 (4): 318–39.Google Scholar
Vaccari, Cristian. 2013. Digital Politics in Western Democracies: A Comparative Study. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Verville, Mélanie. 2012. “Usages politiques des médias sociaux et du Web 2.0. Le cas des partis politiques provinciaux québécois.” Master's thesis. Université Laval, Québec City, Québec.Google Scholar