Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:29:00.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Go North, Young Scholar, Go North

Presidential Address to the Canadian Political Science Association, Waterloo, May 17, 2011

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2012

Graham White
Graham White*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
*
Graham White, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, 100 St. George Street, Toronto ON M5S 3G3; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. The North—defined as the Canadian Arctic—ranks among the most understudied and yet the most promising fields of enquiry for Canadian political scientists. It offers a host of fascinating research topics and intellectual puzzles, many of which entail the often fraught relationship between the Canadian state and Aboriginal peoples. Important conceptual issues await academics studying northern politics and governance. As well, political scientists' work can benefit the governments and the people of the North who are grappling with difficult practical problems as they develop distinctive ways of governing themselves.

Academic work on northern politics can be at once intellectually stimulating, professionally rewarding and of significant practical utility. Accordingly, more Canadian political scientists, especially young scholars, should turn their attention northwards.

Résumé. Le Nord, ou plus précisément l'Arctique canadien, constitue un des champs les moins explorés et pourtant les plus prometteurs pour les politologues canadiens. Son étude révèle une foule de sujets de recherche fascinants et d'énigmes intellectuelles, dont plusieurs se rapportent aux relations souvent tendues entre l'État canadien et les peuples autochtones. D'importants enjeux conceptuels se posent aux chercheurs de la politique nordique et de la gouvernance. De plus, les recherches des politologues peuvent aider les gouvernements et les habitants du Nord à résoudre des problèmes concrets associés au développement de façons distinctives de se gouverner.

En somme, la recherche sur la politique nordique peut être à la fois intellectuellement stimulante, professionnellement gratifiante et pourvu d'une grande utilité pratique. En conséquence, plus de politologues canadiens, et en particulier ceux des nouvelles générations, devraient diriger leur attention vers le Nord.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 747 - 768
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abele, Frances. 2006. “Between Respect and Control: Traditional Indigenous Knowledge in Canadian Public Policy.” In Critical Policy Studies: Contemporary Canadian Approaches, ed. Orsini, Michael and Smith, Miriam. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Abele, Frances. 2009. “The State and the Northern Social Economy: Research Prospects.” The Northern Review 30: 37–58.Google Scholar
Alcantara, Christopher. 2007. “Explaining Aboriginal Treaty Outcomes in Canada: The Cases of the Inuit and the Innu in Labrador.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcantara, Christopher. 2008. “To Treaty or Not to Treaty? Aboriginal Peoples and Comprehensive Land Claims Negotiations in Canada.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 28 (2): 343–69.Google Scholar
Alcantara, Christopher. 2009. “Old Wine in New Bottles? Instrumental Policy Learning and the Evolution of the Certainty Provision in Comprehensive Land Claims Agreements.” Canadian Public Policy 35 (2): 325–41.Google Scholar
Alexander, Cynthia with Adamson, Agar, Daborn, Graham, Houston, John and Tootoo, Victor. 2009. “Inuit Cyberspace: The Struggle for Access to Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit.” Journal of Canadian Studies 43 (2): 220–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amagoalik, John. 2007. Changing the Face of Canada: The Life Story of John Amagoalik, ed. McComber, Louis. Iqaluit: Nunavut Arctic College.Google Scholar
Arnold, Samantha. 2008. “Nelvana of the North: Traditional Knowledge and the Mythical Function of Canadian Foreign Policy.” Canadian Foreign Policy 14 (2): 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aucoin, Peter. 1996. “Political Science and Democratic Governance.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 29 (4): 643–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banting, Keith. 2010. “Is there a Progressive's Dilemma in Canada? Immigration, Multiculturalism and the Welfare State.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 797–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belanger, Yale, ed. 2008. Aboriginal Self-Government in Canada: Current Trends and Issues. Saskatoon: Purich.Google Scholar
Berkes, Fikret. 1999. Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Blais, André. 2005. “Accounting for the Success of the Liberal Party in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 38 (4): 821–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, Michael. 2009. Who Owns the Arctic? Understanding Sovereignty Disputes in the North. Vancouver: Douglas and McIntyre.Google Scholar
Cameron, Kirk. 2009. “Yukon's Ombudsman: An Evolutionary Step Forward.” In Provincial and Territorial Ombudsman Offices in Canada, ed. Hyson, Stewart. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Kirk, and Campbell, Alastair. 2009. “The Devolution of Natural Resources and Nunavut's Constitutional Status.” Journal of Canadian Studies 43 (2): 198–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Alastair, Fenge, Terry and Hanson, Udloriak. 2011. “Implementing the 1993 Nunavut Land Claims Agreement.” Arctic Review on Law and Politics 2 (1): 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, Stephen and Kalt, Joseph P.. 1995. “Cultural Evolution and Constitutional Public Choice: Institutional Diversity and Economic Performance on American Indian Reservations.” Boston: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, Julie. 2004. “Uses and Abuses of ‘Traditional Knowledge’: Perspectives from the Yukon Territory.” In Cultivating Arctic Landscapes: Knowing and Managing Animals in the Circumpolar North, ed. Anderson, D. and Nuttal, Mark. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Dacks, Gurston. 1986. “Politics on the Last Frontier: Consociationalism in the Northwest Territories.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 19 (2): 345–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dacks, Gurston. (ed.) 1990. Devolution and Constitutional Development in the Canadian North. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dacks, Gurston. 2004. “Implementing First Nations Self-Government in Yukon: Lessons for Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 671–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewar, Barry. 2009. “Nunavut and the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement—An Unresolved Relationship.” Policy Options 30 (7): 74–9.Google Scholar
Ellis, Steve. 2005. “Meaningful Consideration? A Review of Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Decision Making.” Arctic 58 (1): 66–77.Google Scholar
Fenge, Terry and Quassa, Paul. 2009. “Negotiating and Implementing the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement.” Policy Options 30 (7): 80–86.Google Scholar
Forsey, Eugene. 1962. “Canada: One Nation or Two?” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 28 (4): 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funston, Bernard. 2007. “Canada's North and Tomorrow's Federalism.” In Constructing Tomorrow's Federalism: New Routes to Effective Governance, ed. Peach, Ian. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Garcea, Joseph. 2007. “Municipal Reviews and Reforms in Northern Canada: Challenges, Choices, Changes and Lessons.” In Federalism, Power, and the North: Governmental Reforms in Russia and Canada, ed. Young, John F.. Toronto: Centre for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Franklyn. 2009. “Canadian Arctic Sovereignty: Time to Take Yes for an Answer on the Northwest Passage.” In Northern Exposure: Peoples, Powers and Prospects in Canada's North, ed. Abele, Frances, Courchene, Thomas J., Seidle, F. Leslie and St-Hilaire, France. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
Henderson, Ailsa. 2007. Nunavut: Rethinking Political Culture. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Heubert, Rob. 2009. “Canada and the Changing International Arctic: At the Crossroads of Cooperation and Conflict.” In Northern Exposure: Peoples, Powers and Prospects in Canada's North, ed. Abele, Frances, Courchene, Thomas J., Seidle, F. Leslie and St-Hilaire, France. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
Hicks, Jack. 2009. “Toward More Effective, Evidence-Based Suicide Prevention in Nunavut.” In Northern Exposure: Peoples, Powers and Prospects in Canada's North, ed. Abele, Frances, Courchene, Thomas J., Seidle, F. Leslie and St-Hilaire, France. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
Irlbacher-Fox, Stephanie. 2009. Finding Dashaa: Self-Government, Social Suffering and Aboriginal Policy in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Jenson, Jane. 1997. “Fated to Live in Interesting Times: Canada's Changing Citizenship Regimes.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 30 (4): 627–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulchyski, Peter. 2005. Like the Sound of a Drum: Aboriginal Cultural Politics in Denendeh and Nunavut. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuokkanen, Rauna. 2011. “From Indigenous Economies to Market-Based Self-Governance: A Feminist Political Economy Analysis.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 275–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemieux, Vincent. 1992. “The Scholar and the Expert.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 25 (4): 651–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loukacheva, Natalia. 2007. The Arctic Promise: Legal and Political Autonomy of Greenland and Nunavut. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Jack. 2009. “Sixty Years of Political Science in Canada.” Unpublished paper. Toronto: University of Toronto Department of Political Science.Google Scholar
Malloy, Tom. 1993. “Negotiating the Nunavut Agreement—A View from the Government Side.” Northern Perspectives 21 (3): 9–11.Google Scholar
Malloy, Tom. 2000. The World is Our Witness: The Historic Journey of the Nisga'a into Canada. Calgary: Fifth House.Google Scholar
Mayer, Paul. 2007. Mayer Report on Nunavut Devolution. Ottawa: Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.Google Scholar
McArthur, Douglas. 2009. “The Changing Architecture of Governance in Yukon and the Northwest Territories.” In Northern Exposure: Peoples, Powers and Prospects in Canada's North, ed. Abele, Frances, Courchene, Thomas J., Seidle, F. Leslie and St-Hilaire, France. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
McGregor, Deborah. 2004. “Coming Full Circle: Indigenous Knowledge, Environment and Our Future.” American Indian Quarterly 28 (3): 385–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, Robert. 2003. New Owners in Their Own Land: Minerals and Inuit Land Claims. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Merritt, John and Fenge, Terry. 1990. “The Nunavut Land Claims Settlement: Emerging Issues in Law and Public Administration.” Queen's Law Journal 15 (2): 255–78.Google Scholar
Merritt, John, Fenge, Terry, Ames, Randy and Jull, Peter. 1989. Nunavut: Political Choices and Manifest Destiny. Ottawa: Canadian Arctic Resources Committee.Google Scholar
Nadasdy, Paul. 2003. Hunters and Bureaucrats: Power, Knowledge and Aboriginal–State Relations in Southwest Yukon. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
North Sky Consulting Group. 2009. Qanukkanniq? The GN Report Card: Analysis & Recommendations. Iqaluit.Google Scholar
Papillon, Martin. 2009. “Towards Post-Colonial Federalism: The Challenges of Aboriginal Self-Determination in the Canadian Context.” In Contemporary Canadian Federalism, ed. Gagnon, Alain-G.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Pocklington, Tom 1998. “The Place of Political Science in Canadian Universities.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 31 (4): 643–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poelzer, Greg, Coates, Ken, Lackenbauer, Whitney, and Morrison, Bill. 2008. Arctic Front: Defending Canada in the Far North. Toronto: Thomas Allen.Google Scholar
Quassa, Paul Aarulaaq. 2008. We Need to Know Who We Are, ed. McComber, Louis. Iqaluit: Nunavut Arctic College.Google Scholar
Riddell-Dixon, Elizabeth. 2008. “Canada and Arctic Politics: The Continental Shelf Demarcation.” Ocean Development and International Law 39 (4): 343–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodon, Thierry and Grey, Minnie. 2009. “The Long and Winding Road to Self-Government: The Nunavik and Nunatsiavut Experiences.” In Northern Exposure: Peoples, Powers and Prospects in Canada's North, ed. Abele, Frances, Courchene, Thomas J., Seidle, F. Leslie and St-Hilaire, France. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. 1995. Report II (part 1). Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.Google Scholar
Russell, Peter. 2004. Constitutional Odyssey: Can Canadians Become a Sovereign People? 3rd ed.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Skogstad, Grace. 2003. “Who Governs? Who Should Govern? Political Authority and Political Legitimacy in Canada in the Twenty-first Century.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36 (5): 955–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slowey, Gabrielle. 2009. “A Fine Balance? Aboriginal Peoples in the Canadian North and the Dilemma of Development.” In First Nations, First Thoughts: The Impact of Indigenous Thought in Canada, ed. Timpson, Annis May. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Miriam. 2009. “Diversity and Canadian Political Development.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 831–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. 2011. “Northern Communities: Towards Social and Economic Prosperity.” http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/programs-programmes/priority_areas-domaines_prioritaires/northern_research-recherche_nord-eng.aspx (July 25, 2011).Google Scholar
Spak, Stella. 2005. “The Position of Indigenous Knowledge in Canadian Co-management Organizations.” Anthropologica 47 (2): 233–46.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2007. Community Profiles from the 2006 Census—Census Subdivisions. Ottawa. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/stcsr/query.html?style=emp&qt=old+crow&charset=iso-8859-1&qm=1&oq=old+crow+yukon&rq=1 (July 25, 2011).Google Scholar
Timpson, Annis May. 2004. “The Challenges of Intergovernmental Relations for Nunavut.” In Canada: The State of the Federation 2002: Reconfiguring State–Aboriginal Relations, ed. Murphy, Michael. Kingston and Montreal: McGill–Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Timpson, Annis May. 2006. “Stretching the Concept of Representative Bureaucracy: The Case of Nunavut.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 72 (4): 517–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timpson, Annis May. 2009a. “Rethinking the Administration of Government: Inuit Representation, Culture, and Language in the Nunavut Public Service.” In First Nations, First Thoughts: The Impact of Indigenous Thought in Canada, ed. Timpson, Annis May. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Timpson, Annis May. 2009b. “Reconciling Indigenous and Settler Language Interests: Language Policy Initiatives in Nunavut.” Journal of Canadian Studies 43 (2): 159–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usher, Peter. 2000. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Environmental Assessment and Management.” Arctic 52 (3): 183–93.Google Scholar
Usher, Peter. 2003. “Environment, Race and Nation Reconsidered: Reflections on Aboriginal Land Claims in Canada.” The Canadian Geographer 47 (4): 365–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Graham. 1991. “Westminster in the Arctic: The Adaptation of British Parliamentarism in the Legislative Assembly of the Northwest Territories.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 24 (3): 499–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Graham. 1998. Breaking the Trail to Northern Community Empowerment: The Community Transfer Initiative in Cape Dorset. Toronto: Centre for Urban and Community Studies.Google Scholar
White, Graham. 2002. “Treaty Federalism in Northern Canada: Aboriginal–Government Land Claims Boards.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 32 (1): 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Graham. 2006a. “Traditional Aboriginal Values in a Westminster Parliament: the Legislative Assembly of Nunavut.” Journal of Legislative Studies 12 (1): 8–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Graham. 2006b. “Cultures in Collision: Traditional Knowledge and EuroCanadian Governance Processes in Northern Land-Claim Boards.” Arctic 59 (1): 401–14.Google Scholar
White, Graham. 2008. “‘Not the Almighty’: Evaluating Aboriginal Influence in Northern Claims Boards.” Arctic 61 (Supp): 71–85.Google Scholar
White, Graham. 2009. “Governance in Nunavut: Capacity vs. Culture?” Journal of Canadian Studies 43 (1): 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Gary. 2005. “Nested Federalism and Aboriginal Sovereignty in Russia and Canada.” In Recrafting Federalism in Russia and Canada: Power, Budgets and Indigenous Governance, ed. Solomon, Peter H.. Toronto: Centre for Russian and East European Studies.Google Scholar
Wilson, Gary. 2008. “Nested Federalism in Arctic Quebec: A Comparative Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar