Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T02:30:57.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Will it be me? Identity, concern and perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Patrick Stokes
Patrick Stokes*
Affiliation:
School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, BurwoodVIC, 3125, Australia
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Self-reflexive or egocentric concern has been taken to present a serious problem for reductionist and eliminativist metaphysical accounts of personal identity. Philosophers have tended to respond in one of three ways: by continuing the search for a metaphysical account of identity that (prudentially if not morally) justifies egocentric concern; by accepting that egocentric concern can hold between persons who are not numerically identical; or by advocating the abandonment of egocentric concern altogether. All these approaches, however, distinguish between metaphysical ‘facts’ and affective responses to them. Exploring a well-known example from Bernard Williams, I argue that egocentric concern presents itself as irreducibly first-personal and as making its own set of numerical personal identity claims on the phenomenal level. Williams' example also points to the need to complicate the first/third person schema by factoring in a further distinction between present-tense and implicitly atemporal perspectives on the self. Once this move is made, we can see that the identity claims figured in first-person present-tense experience and those arrived at through metaphysical deliberation need to be distinguished. We should resist the temptation to privilege one perspective over the other in all instances, or to collapse them into a unitary account of selfhood.

Keywords

personal identityegocentric concernsurvivalperspective
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , 2013 , pp. 206 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, John L. 1964. Sense and Sensibilia, Edited by: Warnock, G. J. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Lynn Rudder. 2000. Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Simon. 2008. Going Narrative: Schechtman and the Russians. South African Journal of Philosophy, 27(2): 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christman, John. 2008. “Why Search for Lost Time? Memory, Autonomy, and Practical Reason”. In Practical Identity and Narrative Agency, Edited by: Mackenzie, Catriona and Atkins, Kim. 146–166. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dainton, Barry. 2008. The Phenomenal Self, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, Peter. 1972. Logic Matters, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. 1798. Enquiry Concerning Political Justice: and its Influence on Morals and Happiness, Vol. 1, London: G.G. and J. Robinson.Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark. 2010. Surviving Death, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. 2006. Søren Kierkegaards Skrifter, Edited by: Cappelørn, Niels Jørgen Garff, Joakim Hansen, Anne Mette and Kondrup, Johnny. Vol. 11, Copenhagen: Gads.Google Scholar
Kind, Amy. 2004. The Metaphysics of Personal Identity and Our Special Concern for the Future. Metaphilosophy, 35(4): 536–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madell, Geoffrey. 1981. The Identity of the Self, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Madell, Geoffrey. 1991. “Personal Identity and the Idea of a Human Being”. In Human Beings, Edited by: Cockburn, David. 127–142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Raymond. 1998. Self-Concern: An Experiential Approach to What Matters in Survival, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Raymond and Baressi, John. 2000. Naturalization of the Soul: Self and Personal Identity in the Eighteenth Century, Maldon, MA: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View From Nowhere, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise. 2005. Pensées, Translated and edited by Roger Ariew. Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar
Rudd, Anthony. 2005. Narrative, Expression and Mental Substance. Inquiry, 48(5): 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechtman, Marya. 1996. The Constitution of Selves, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schechtman, Marya. 2001. Empathic access: The Missing Ingredient in Personal Identity. Philosophical Explorations, 4(2): 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechtman, Marya. 2007. “Stories, Lives, and Basic Survival: A Refinement and Defence of the Narrative View”. In Narrative and Understanding Persons, Edited by: Hutto, Daniel D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slors, Marc. 1998. Two Conceptions of Psychological Continuity. Philosophical Explorations, 1(1): 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slors, Marc. 2004. Care For One's Own Future Experiences. Philosophical Explorations, 7(2): 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Patrick. 2008. Locke, Kierkegaard, and the Phenomenology of Personal Identity. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 16(5): 645–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Patrick. 2010. What's Missing in Episodic Selfhood? A Kierkegaardian Response to Galen Strawson. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(1–2): 119–143.Google Scholar
Stokes, Patrick. 2011. Uniting the Perspectival Subject: Two Approaches. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10(1): 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Patrick. Forthcoming. “Crossing the Bridge: The First-Person and Time.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive SciencesGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Galen. 2009. Selves: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Galen. 2011. Owning the Past: Reply to Stokes. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(3–4): 170–195.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1959. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. 1984a. “Personal Identity: The Dualist Theory”. In Personal Identity, Edited by: Shoemaker, Sydney and Swinburne, Richard. 1–66. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. 1984b. “Richard Swinburne's Reply”. In Personal Identity, Edited by: Shoemaker, Sydney and Swinburne, Richard. 133–138. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Unger, Peter. 1990. Identity, Consciousness and Value, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Frassen, Bas C. 2005. “Transcendence of the Ego (The Non-Existent Knight)”. In The Self?, Edited by: Strawson, Galen. 87–110. Maldon, MA: Routledge.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. 2006. Self to Self: Selected Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1973. Problems of the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Susan. 1986. Self-Interest and Interest in Selves. Ethics, 96(4): 704–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollheim, Richard. 1999. The Thread of Life, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. 2005. Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. 2007. “Self and Other: The Limits of Narrative Understanding”. In Narrative and Understanding Persons, Edited by: Hutto, Daniel D. 179–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar