Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:32:31.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transparency and reflection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Matthew Boyle
Matthew Boyle*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
*
Matthew Boyle [email protected]Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Much recent work on self-knowledge has been inspired by the idea that the ‘transparency’ of questions about our own mental states to questions about the non-mental world holds the key to understanding how privileged self-knowledge is possible. I critically discuss some prominent recent accounts of such transparency, and argue for a Sartrean interpretation of the phenomenon, on which this knowledge is explained by our capacity to transform an implicit or ‘non-positional’ self-awareness into reflective, ‘positional’ self-knowledge.

Keywords

Transparencyself-knowledgeJean-Paul Sartrereflectionprivileged accessbeliefintention
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 49 , Issue 7 , November 2019 , pp. 1012 - 1039
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bar-On, D. 2004. Speaking My Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, M. 2011. “Transparent Self-Knowledge.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume LXXXV, 223–240. doi:10.1186/1556-276X-6-223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, A. 2005. “Introspection.” Philosophical Topics 33 (1 ): 79–104. doi:10.5840/philtopics20053312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, A. 2011. “Transparency, Belief, Intention.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume LXXXV, 201–221.Google Scholar
Byrne, A. 2012. “Knowing What I See.” In Introspection and Consciousness, edited by Smithies, D. and Stoljar, D., 183–210. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, A. 2018. Transparency and Self-Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. 2003. “How Do You Know You are Not a Zombie?.” In Privileged Access: Philosophical Accounts of Self-Knowledge, edited by Gertler, B.. Aldershot: Ashgate 1–13.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 2012. “Awareness and Authority: Skeptical Doubts about Self-Knowledge.” In Introspection and Consciousness, edited by Smithies, D. and Stoljar, D., 49–64. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, D. 2001. Expression and the Inner. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gallois, A. 1996. The World Without, the Mind Within. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, R. 1999. “The Authority of Self-Consciousness.” Philosophical Topics 26 (1–2 ): 179–200. doi:10.5840/philtopics1999261/242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, R. 2001. Authority and Estrangement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Peacocke, C. 2008. Truly Understood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peacocke, C. 1998. “Conscious Attitudes, Attention, and Self-Knowledge.” In Knowing Our Own Minds, edited by Wright, C., Smith, B., and MacDonald, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sartre, J. P. 1943. L’Être et le Néant. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Sartre, J. P. 1956. Being and Nothingness. Trans. Barnes, H.. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Sartre, J. P. 1962. The Transcendence of the Ego. New York: Farrar: Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Sartre, J. P. 1966. La Transcendence De l’Ego. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Setiya, K. 2012. “Knowledge of Intention.” In Essays on Anscombe'sIntention, edited by Ford, A., Hornsby, J., and Stoutland, F., 64–97. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shah, N., and Velleman, J. D.. 2005. “Doxastic Deliberation.” Philosophical Review 114 (4 ): 497–534. doi:10.1215/00318108-114-4-497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silins, N. 2012. “Judgment as a Guide to Belief.” In Smithies and Stoljar 2012.Google Scholar
Weiskrantz, L. 1986. Blindsight: A Case Study and Its Implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar